dlazz;1204960 wrote:I think they'd have been better off taking a card from the Apple pile and went all-in with one or the other. They're just saturating the market by doing that.
I'm under the assumption that certain programs won't work on those ARM processors...
What do you mean all-in with one or the other?
The Windows RT/non-x86 processor versions are actually the true competitor to the iPad. They'll be thinner and likely have better battery life than x86 versions. Windows RT as I understand it isn't capable of running all the code that normal Windows 8 will be able to run but still can handle more languages than iOS or Android for that matter (as I've been told).
The x86/normal Windows 8 ones are something else entirely and if they manage to have good performance, which it looks like they should and are a reasonable price they could shake things up quite a bit.
Microsoft is actually going more "all in" than Apple if you think about it across their whole ecosystem. Apple has iOS and OS X which stay in their little boxes. Microsoft the last few years has really started to bring all of it's stuff together, if I wanted to use business babble I'd talk about ecosystem convergence or something probably. Especially when they intro Windows Phone 8 and the next Xbox I'd bet that all this stuff is even more similar and works together even better.
I still think that while this isn't a surefire homerun or "gamechanger" it certainly seems more compelling to me than the thought of a more direct iPad competitor via some version of Windows Phone on a bigger screen (and not because I don't like that OS, IMO it's the best phone OS out right now. I just like this play better)