Glory Days;1194067 wrote:then maybe those people shouldnt be on the internet while at work? going to any website runs the risk of having some weird advertisement or anything(not just half naked women) that may be NSFW pop up. just curious, how many people this would effect?
and no one goes to the basement forum, its only been a novelty due to recent events.
but how many people does this actually effect? less than 10? then again, that is 10% of the active posting i suppose.ts1227;1194099 wrote:I've generally never been a fan of catering to those fucking off at work either and have fought that fight on the mod forum. But the fact is a lot of traffic (and thus revenue) is going to come from people wasting time at work. So a choice has to be made, to alter rules to help that, or keep on keeping on and possibly hurt growth
Personally, I use my phone to access it at work, problem solved.
awesome, so 2-3 posts? traffic during the day is down anyway and would be down even with these new rules because well...people are busy.chicago510;1194082 wrote:You serious? Traffic on Serious Business would drop like a bomb. I would honestly post more at school/work if I wasn't afraid of what is going to show up on random threads in public
Dude, if you want to look at girls in no clothing, google it. Leave that shit off the forum. It's add nothing.Glory Days;1194102 wrote:but how many people does this actually effect? less than 10? then again, that is 10% of the active posting i suppose.
and like most new rules, you think it will be followed/enforced?
There are plenty of other places you can look at nudes at home. This is the only Ohio forum I post on during the day. Capiche?Glory Days;1194107 wrote:awesome, so 2-3 posts? traffic during the day is down anyway and would be down even with these new rules because well...people are busy.
justin, you have stats for visits during the time of day?
This. It's a freaking joke that we need half naked ladies in random threads. Get a freaking life.chicago510;1194141 wrote:There are plenty of other places you can look at nudes at home. This is the only Ohio forum I post on during the day. Capiche?
So do I for the time being, but I can't post/read nearly as much on my phone as I could with a computer.ts1227;1194099 wrote:I've generally never been a fan of catering to those fucking off at work either and have fought that fight on the mod forum. But the fact is a lot of traffic (and thus revenue) is going to come from people wasting time at work. So a choice has to be made, to alter rules to help that, or keep on keeping on and possibly hurt growth
Personally, I use my phone to access it at work, problem solved.
Pot meet kettle, you are one of the main reasons this site has been forced to go through changes lately.sleeper;1194139 wrote:Dude, if you want to look at girls in no clothing, google it. Leave that shit off the forum. It's add nothing.
I rarely even posts things like that except once in a blue moon so technically this has no effect on me. I just look at it from the outside and see changes being made that really wont make a difference.justincredible;1194137 wrote:Traffic during the day is actually picking up lately. Pageviews and ad revenue were way down. On a very nice uptick now. I'm not sure why you continue to argue your point. Is it that big of a deal that you just need to keep "racy" pictures in specific threads?
you'd like your principal to see you looking at a bunch of girls in bikinis while you're at work?ccrunner609;1194447 wrote:half of those pics arent even close to NSFW. Chicks in bathing suits...give me a break.
Coming from a guy who posted a picture of his b-hole on here.ccrunner609;1194447 wrote:half of those pics arent even close to NSFW. Chicks in bathing suits...give me a break.
ccrunner609;1194447 wrote:half of those pics arent even close to NSFW. Chicks in bathing suits...give me a break.
Hardly.Glory Days;1194428 wrote:Pot meet kettle, you are one of the main reasons this site has been forced to go through changes lately.
Infraction pendingccrunner609;1194692 wrote:Are you kidding....this POS website is blocked at work.
if it wasn't, would you want your boss to see you looking at girls in bikinis?ccrunner609;1194692 wrote:Are you kidding....this POS website is blocked at work.
Good.ccrunner609;1194692 wrote:Are you kidding....this POS website is blocked at work.
[/sp]
probably a ton of people who don't know how to do thatO-Trap;1201674 wrote:If a NSFW image is appropriate for the topic of the thread, but the thread title does not have 'NSFW' in it, could we do a spoiler with an 'NSFW' alert?
Example:
Spoiler is NSFW:
[sp]
[sp][img]image[/img][/sp]there's a lot of easy stuff that people on here can't do.O-Trap;1201802 wrote:It's as easy as 'sp'.
[PHP][sp][/sp][/PHP]
Or you just click SP in the text bar.O-Trap;1201802 wrote:It's as easy as 'sp'.
[PHP][sp]
Touche.pnhasbeen;1202104 wrote:there's a lot of easy stuff that people on here can't do.
rational conversation for instance.
Indeed.DeyDurkie5;1202111 wrote:Or you just click SP in the text bar.
"I'm otrap and I try and act like a know-it-all god loving doucher."