Hmmm, interesting proposition. I'd hate to offer that option, though, because that would open up for accusations of banning just to try and get people to pay.chicago510;1180991 wrote:How much cash money in bribes does it take for one to get unbant?
I learnted it ats the bellefontaine construction edumucation university. The 10 year continouse prograam.SnotBubbles;1180961 wrote:Good engalish.
That's actually not a bad idea justin. You should force bant members to pay a certain fine if they want to be bailed early. Each time they get bant, the bail fee rises.justincredible;1180997 wrote:Hmmm, interesting proposition. I'd hate to offer that option, though, because that would open up for accusations of banning just to try and get people to pay.
But seriously, $50.
Good school!like_that;1181002 wrote:I learnted it ats the bellefontaine construction edumucation university. The 10 year continouse prograam.
If your dicatatorship doesn't have some sort of ongoing corruption scandel you are running things like a giant vag.justincredible;1180997 wrote:Hmmm, interesting proposition. I'd hate to offer that option, though, because that would open up for accusations of banning just to try and get people to pay.
But seriously, $50.
Just wondering how deep the corruption is around here.Raw Dawgin' it;1180994 wrote:You're not even banned so who gives a fuck?
What kind of idiot is actually going to pay.like_that;1181014 wrote:That's actually not a bad idea justin. You should force bant members to pay a certain fine if they want to be bailed early. Each time they get bant, the bail fee rises.
justincredible;1181029 wrote:What kind of idiot is actually going to pay.
justincredible;1181029 wrote:What kind of idiot is actually going to pay.
like_that,COA,ETB,RawDawginit,snotbubbles,sleeper to name a few. I think Justin could retire early just off the fines.justincredible;1181029 wrote:What kind of idiot is actually going to pay.
justincredible;1181029 wrote:What kind of idiot is actually going to pay.
Solid group of posters!Skyhook79;1181047 wrote:like_that,COA,ETB,RawDawginit,snotbubbles,sleeper to name a few. I think Justin could retire early just off the fines.
SnotBubbles:Posts Per Day 6.16
Posts Per Day 4.62
lol good times.Curly J;1181042 wrote:Well Rydawg. He paid you to make LJ only a mod in the Poli Forum.
He actually paid me to go to t shirt design school. That was just a cover.Curly J;1181042 wrote:Well Rydawg. He paid you to make LJ only a mod in the Poli Forum.
Me either. Luckily I get paid.sleeper;1181060 wrote:I would never pay to use these forums.
This is very true. We all have 30+ ACT scores, but the common sense factor of spoiled three-year-olds.like_that;1181039 wrote:You're talking about the OC here.
Heretic;1181072 wrote:This is very true. We all have 30+ ACT scores, but the common sense factor of spoiled three-year-olds.
stalkerSnotBubbles;1181051 wrote:FYI...
Skyhook79: Posts Per Day 6.16
SnotBubbles:Posts Per Day 4.62
I see overmoderation of you in the future. Good luck.SnotBubbles;1181049 wrote:
Skyhook79;1181047 wrote:like_that,COA,ETB,RawDawginit,snotbubbles,sleeper to name a few. I think Justin could retire early just off the fines.
What does daily post count have to do with whether you would pay a fine to having posting privileges after you were banned?SnotBubbles;1181051 wrote:Solid group of posters!
FYI...
Skyhook79:
SnotBubbles:
Doesn't mean you wouldn't pay if you were banned and it also shows how mods don't follow the rules always and why they say they are going to if you have never been banned. Not surprised it went over your head.like_that;1181095 wrote:You have already been banned once. I have never been close to being banned. Lol failhook fails once again. When will the fail ever stop?
justincredible;1180889 wrote:I think he has 16 days left.
Yeah, i would spin it into that fail too. FYI if the mods were following the rules, you would have been permabanned a long time ago, and 90% of the OC problems would be gone. Keep on QQing though. It's good entertainment.Skyhook79;1181106 wrote:What does daily post count have to do with whether you would pay a fine to having posting privileges after you were banned?
Doesn't mean you wouldn't pay if you were banned and it also shows how mods don't follow the rules always and why they say they are going to if you have never been banned. Not surprised it went over your head.