Belly35;1166886 wrote:Really!

Addition employer / business insurance cost for the increase in HIV down the road for married gay couples.
How about the potential sex change operation insurance cost how will at effect the cost of insuranse with in a company. Is that now added to the plan policy?
Will one of the partners want a maturity leave for an adoption.... going to happen sooner or later
Filing a join gay married account lost government tax revenue .. perfect
Third bathroom offices Male, Female and MFSP (male female sex partner) Non-gays check out their gay partners

Lol.

Belly35;1166886 wrote:Really!

Addition employer / business insurance cost for the increase in HIV down the road for married gay couples.
How about the potential sex change operation insurance cost how will at effect the cost of insuranse with in a company. Is that now added to the plan policy?
Will one of the partners want a maturity leave for an adoption.... going to happen sooner or later
Filing a join gay married account lost government tax revenue .. perfect
Third bathroom offices Male, Female and MFSP (male female sex partner) Non-gays check out their gay partners

LOL you are an idiot belly. Those are some of the dumbest things I've heard. Although, I did chuckle.

Belly35;1166886 wrote:Really!

Addition employer / business insurance cost for the increase in HIV down the road for married gay couples.
How about the potential sex change operation insurance cost how will at effect the cost of insuranse with in a company. Is that now added to the plan policy?
Will one of the partners want a maturity leave for an adoption.... going to happen sooner or later
Filing a join gay married account lost government tax revenue .. perfect
Third bathroom offices Male, Female and MFSP (male female sex partner) Non-gays check out their gay partners

If negs existed, I would neg. This is terrible, sorry, but this is just the worst.

What is maturity leave?

ernest_t_bass;1166919 wrote:What is maturity leave?

When you're told to go on leave because your level of maturity causes you to make absolutely comically horrible lists of reasons gay marriage will impact businesses.

well if they were in a union they can get on your insurance without being married as your "partner"...hope this helps

Belly35;1166886 wrote:Really!

Addition employer / business insurance cost for the increase in HIV down the road for married gay couples.
How about the potential sex change operation insurance cost how will at effect the cost of insuranse with in a company. Is that now added to the plan policy?
Will one of the partners want a materity leave for an adoption.... going to happen sooner or later
Filing a join gay married account lost government tax revenue .. perfect
Third bathroom offices Male, Female and MFSP (male female sex partner) Non-gays check out their gay partners

Fixed maturity ... to .. maternity ... I have to admit that is funny but humor is close to the truth

maternitly leave for a same sex couple...hmmmmm but anyway what is the differnce if two dykes have a baby why cant they get the same maternity leave as the whore down the hallway??

plus if they are married that actually reduces the chance of HIV down the road and thus saving taxpayer money overall

Modern HIV drugs can keep people healthy for decades, but if you take them you could be facing well over $400,000 or more in lifetime costs for HIV treatment. Unfortunately, real or perceived cost is a significant barrier to care — data suggests that only about half of low-income people living with HIV are receiving the HIV drugs they need because of cost.

As a employee I don't want to add this prices tag to my business insurance plan for Gay Couples every one in the company month percentage will go up... ...

Belly35;1166955 wrote:Modern HIV drugs can keep people healthy for decades, but if you take them you could be facing well over $400,000 or more in lifetime costs for HIV treatment. Unfortunately, real or perceived cost is a significant barrier to care — data suggests that only about half of low-income people living with HIV are receiving the HIV drugs they need because of cost.

As a employee I don't want to add this prices tag to my business insurance plan for Gay Couples every one in the company month percentage will go up... ...

magic johnson has aids. he is straight. again, you are an idiot.

again...many places i dont think you have to be married to get on the insurance anyway...but still if you are monogamous with your spouse..then you wont get HIV...most people probably dont line up to marry someone that already has HIV unless they already had HIV...i think but i have no data to support that lol

DeyDurkie5;1166964 wrote:magic johnson has aids. he is straight. again, you are an idiot.

You identify one individual and that justifies your views ... and I'm the idoit

Belly, you're such a forking idoit.

Belly35;1167006 wrote:You identify one individual and that justifies your views ... and I'm the idoit

you are lumping in a section of people like they are the only one who has aids. and you are an IDIOT, you idoit

Skyhook79;1166520 wrote:Where is that in the Bible?

For someone as religious as you I'm surprised you haven't read the book of Leviticus...

DeyDurkie5;1166964 wrote:magic johnson has aids. he is straight. again, you are an idiot.

I am not agreeing with belly, but your logic is flawed.

It is an undeniable fact that the HIV infection percentages are MUCH higher in homosexuals than heterosexuals. We can debate the reasons/cause/effects/etc but that is a fact.

Y-Town Steelhound;1167095 wrote:For someone as religious as you I'm surprised you haven't read the book of Leviticus...

Ah, the Leviticus argument...

You do realize the book of Leviticus was a historical record of the Jewish laws, not a list of devine moral statutes given by God.

So, when the book of Leviticus talks about the Jewish Law at the time requiring the death penalty for homosexuality, that was a historical record of their human law system. That was NOT a law given by God for us/them to abide by.

Now, does the Bible say homosexual acts are sin? Yes.
Does the Bible ANYWHERE say to hate homosexuals? Absolutely not.

I realize that MANY Christians don't realize this and chastise homosexuals, but they are most definitely wrong in their actions/beliefs.

Now, on subject, personally I am ok with gay marriage as long as the law states that no religious institution or even a religious judge can be forced to do the ceremony.

Confirm that, and I see no problem with the law of the land allowing it.

DeyDurkie5;1167016 wrote:you are lumping in a section of people like they are the only one who has aids. and you are an IDIOT, you idoit

This topic is about GAY Marriage to keep the subject matter in line with GAY Marriage post, which would suggest that I am referring only to GAYS and the potential future increase of HIV within the GAY Couple Community. You however being gay refuse to provide any documentation that supports your view, that in the future the increase of Gay Marriages would not hinder society with addition cost to non-gay citizens. You prefer to only do what act feels best and easy now and not recognize potential problems that may or may not effect other generation. Plus the fact it is easy just to call some an idiot over the internet without getting your ass kicked by an old guy and that should make a small individual like you feel big.

belly....everything you are saying is "wrong with gays" or would cause a problem as direct result from allowing gay marriages, can happen in a completely heterosexual relationship too. Yes, even butt sex. There is no fact in your argument, just a bunch of conservative, old school bull shit. I like you man...but you are wayyyyyy wrong on this one.

Belly35;1167205 wrote:This topic is about GAY Marriage to keep the subject matter in line with GAY Marriage post, which would suggest that I am referring only to GAYS and the potential future increase of HIV within the GAY Couple Community. You however being gay refuse to provide any documentation that supports your view, that in the future the increase of Gay Marriages would not hinder society with addition cost to non-gay citizens. You prefer to only do what act feels best and easy now and not recognize potential problems that may or may not effect other generation. Plus the fact it is easy just to call some an idiot over the internet without getting your ass kicked by an old guy and that should make a small individual like you feel big.

Belly, I will be totally out of character and give a plain and logical response to your concerns of aids within same sex marriages.

1. Monogamous relationships tend to have a lower incidense of sexually transmitted disease. It happens, just not as much. Common sense would tell you that the fewer people that are in a sexual circle, the lower the chances for a disease to be transmitted to the group.

2. Accepting point #1 for the truth that it is, You should be all for same sex marriages. If Billy and Jeb are in an exclusive relationship, The chances are nill that they will not transmit aids if they did not have it begin with.

Looking at points one and two, I now declare that Belly is in favor of same sex marriage.

Now for the rest of you self described Republican pubes, You need to stop worring about other people junk.

You want the government out of your junk ( out of your religion, out of your wallet, out of your business ), but you are all in favor of the government interfering in other people junk ( civil unions, female uteruses, sexual preferenses).

I cannot believe the hypocrosy of the right on marriage. From the religious standpoint, the right says that the marriage is a sacred bond in front of God, and yet they cheat, re-marry, and divorce as much or more than the athiests and agnostics. This is an irreconcilable conflict.

If you are worried about the sanctity of marriage, Outlaw divorce. Outlaw second marriages. I will then believe that you are truly concerned with the morality of same sex marriage.

So women and gay's are key to Obama's re-election? That should piss off the far right radicals that much more.

Belly35;1166955 wrote:Modern HIV drugs can keep people healthy for decades, but if you take them you could be facing well over $400,000 or more in lifetime costs for HIV treatment. Unfortunately, real or perceived cost is a significant barrier to care — data suggests that only about half of low-income people living with HIV are receiving the HIV drugs they need because of cost.

As a employee I don't want to add this prices tag to my business insurance plan for Gay Couples every one in the company month percentage will go up... ...

Man, I forgot only Gay people got AIDS.

This is such a non-issue. In the grand scheme of things, it does not matter. It will not change the every day life of straight people. There will be no great cost, marriage will still go on.

Y-Town Steelhound;1167095 wrote:For someone as religious as you I'm surprised you haven't read the book of Leviticus...

I am not religious.

Stop with the name calling already