W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 19, 2012 11:56pm
What didn't you understand? I'll try typing slower.LJ;1176184 wrote:Yes. Make some sense please.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 19, 2012 11:57pm
Haha ok.LJ;1176186 wrote:Bullys are not a vicious breed.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 19, 2012 11:57pm
WebFire;1176185 wrote:Stronger wouldn't matter if they weren't attacking. Dogs run loose around the neighborhood all the time. They don't attack.
ok Webadore. Other breeds attack people all the time.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 19, 2012 11:58pm
WebFire;1176187 wrote:What didn't you understand? I'll try typing slower.
Try it, might help you make some sense.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 19, 2012 11:58pm
[LEFT]31 U.S. fatal dog attacks occurred in 2011. Despite being regulated in [/LEFT]Military Housing areas[LEFT] and over [/LEFT]650 U.S. cities[LEFT], pit bulls led these attacks accounting for 71% (22). Pit bulls make up less than 5% of the total U.S. dog population[/LEFT]LJ;1176189 wrote:ok Webadore. Other breeds attack people all the time.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 19, 2012 11:59pm
[LEFT]Notably in 2011, adult victims of fatal pit bull attacks more than doubled the number of child victims. Of the 22 total pit bull victims, 68% (15) fell between the ages of 32 to 76, and 32% (7) were ages 5 years and younger.[/LEFT]
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 19, 2012 11:59pm
WebFire;1176192 wrote:[LEFT]31 U.S. fatal dog attacks occurred in 2011. Despite being regulated in [/LEFT]Military Housing areas[LEFT] and over [/LEFT]650 U.S. cities[LEFT], pit bulls led these attacks accounting for 71% (22). Pit bulls make up less than 5% of the total U.S. dog population[/LEFT]
that means other breeds dont attack people all the time? ROFL
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 19, 2012 11:59pm
[LEFT]The year 2011 also marks an increase in pet pit bulls killing their owners. Of the 8 total instances this year in which a family dog inflicted fatal injury to its primary caretaker, the dog's owner, 88% (7) involved pet pit bulls.[/LEFT]
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 19, 2012 11:59pm
Did I say that? You're reaching.LJ;1176196 wrote:that means other breeds dont attack people all the time? ROFL
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 20, 2012 12:00am
they just don't kill them.LJ;1176189 wrote:ok Webadore. Other breeds attack people all the time.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 20, 2012 12:01am
LoL why dont you ask the greiving families about that one.LJ;1176186 wrote:Bullys are not a vicious breed.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 20, 2012 12:01am
By compiling U.S. and Canadian press accounts between 1982 and 2011, Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People, shows the breeds most responsible for serious injury and death.
[h=4]The combination of pit bulls, rottweilers, their close mixes and wolf hybrids:[/h]
[h=4]The combination of pit bulls, rottweilers, their close mixes and wolf hybrids:[/h]
- 77% of attacks that induce bodily harm
- 73% of attacks to children
- 81% of attack to adults
- 68% of attacks that result in fatalities
- 76% that result in maiming
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 20, 2012 12:03am
WebFire;1176198 wrote:Did I say that? You're reaching.
Did you respond to that statement?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 20, 2012 12:04am
WebFire;1176203 wrote:By compiling U.S. and Canadian press accounts between 1982 and 2011, Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People, shows the breeds most responsible for serious injury and death.
[h=4]The combination of pit bulls, rottweilers, their close mixes and wolf hybrids:[/h]
- 77% of attacks that induce bodily harm
- 73% of attacks to children
- 81% of attack to adults
- 68% of attacks that result in fatalities
- 76% that result in maiming
I got an idea, lets add other breeds and a wild animal mix to the stats so that it fits our argument!!!
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 20, 2012 12:04am
Wut?LJ;1176205 wrote:Did you respond to that statement?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 20, 2012 12:05am
WebFire;1176209 wrote:Wut?
Dave Hester, get some culture.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 20, 2012 12:05am
I have an idea. Let's comprehend that regardless, pits are in the top 3 breeds.LJ;1176207 wrote:I got an idea, lets add other breeds and a wild animal mix to the stats so that it fits our argument!!!
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 20, 2012 12:05am
I know who is in the picture. That does that have to do with anything?LJ;1176212 wrote:Dave Hester, get some culture.
Yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuup!
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 20, 2012 12:05am
Webadore and Isadore, have either of you owned a large breed dog? (50 lbs and up)
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 20, 2012 12:06am
Yes.LJ;1176216 wrote:Webadore and Isadore, have either of you owned a large breed dog? (50 lbs and up)
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 20, 2012 12:06am
WebFire;1176213 wrote:I have an idea. Let's comprehend that regardless, pits are in the top 3 breeds.
Lol. yeah, changing it to multi breeds now to your your argument. Got it.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 20, 2012 12:07am
Nope. Keep trying.LJ;1176218 wrote:Lol. yeah, changing it to multi breeds now to your your argument. Got it.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 20, 2012 12:07am
WebFire;1176217 wrote:Yes.
Breed? Size? Sex? On your own or as a child?
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 20, 2012 12:07am
yepLJ;1176216 wrote:Webadore and Isadore, have either of you owned a large breed dog? (50 lbs and up)
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 20, 2012 12:08am
WebFire;1176219 wrote:Nope. Keep trying.
Not really having to try at all. Your webadore is shining bright tonight.