C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Jun 19, 2012 9:58am
I repeat, who isn't more successful killing the vulnerable as opposed to the less vulnerable?isadore;1204341 wrote:if the goal is killing the young or the old pit bulls are more successful
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jun 19, 2012 9:58am
Raw Dawgin' it;1204342 wrote:He's the only person I have on my ignore list - i think everyone should follow suit.
Good idea, I just added him. This thread is already 100% more enjoyable
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jun 19, 2012 9:58am
No he hasn't. Just your assumption/profiling that the dog is dangerous. You racist too? Seem to profile everything else.isadore;1204345 wrote:gosh a ruddies this guy has already shown depraved indifference by bringing his killer dog among other peoples children while he plays basketball.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jun 19, 2012 9:58am
I think I'll follow suit.LJ;1204347 wrote:Good idea, I just added him. This thread is already 100% more enjoyable
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jun 19, 2012 10:00am
I wish I could set up the software to automatically thread ban isadore from any thread mentioning pitbulls.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jun 19, 2012 10:00am
Gib ya $20justincredible;1204352 wrote:I wish I could set up the software to automatically thread ban isadore from any thread mentioning pitbulls.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 19, 2012 10:01am
You said "successfully." A grown man would have a higher success rate trying to kill an infant or the elderly, as they are weaker than the ages in between.isadore;1204332 wrote:No, pit bulls are most likely to kill very young and very old people. Humans are least likely to kill the very young and the very old.
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0311.pdf
Reps for reading comprehension.Con_Alma;1204333 wrote:Likely wasn't the operative word. Successful was.
Reps for factual statements.Rotinaj;1204337 wrote:Actually pit bulls are most likely NOT to kill at all.
Only if "much" means approximately one dozen a year, using a sample of pit bull breeds in excess of 4 million registered.isadore;1204339 wrote:much more likely than any other type of dog.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Jun 19, 2012 10:01am
BR1986FB;1204348 wrote:No he hasn't. Just your assumption/profiling that the dog is dangerous. You racist too? Seem to profile everything else.
depraved indifference.Steel Valley Football wrote:A guy playing hoops at our local park had his pit loose with kids running around.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jun 19, 2012 10:01am
He might be able to retire with all of the people willing to throw in $20. :laugh:LJ;1204353 wrote:Gib ya $20
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Jun 19, 2012 10:03am
why do you want to have killer dogs running loose in our communities?justincredible;1204352 wrote:I wish I could set up the software to automatically thread ban isadore from any thread mentioning pitbulls.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jun 19, 2012 10:04am
The retard level is high in this thread.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 19, 2012 10:06am
Same with humans.isadore;1204341 wrote:if the goal is killing the young or the old pit bulls are more successful
Common sense, I thought I told you to leave!!!Con_Alma;1204346 wrote:I repeat, who isn't more successful killing the vulnerable as opposed to the less vulnerable?
I agree, and it applies to all dogs. Dog not on a leash? Shoot on site.isadore;1204356 wrote:depraved indifference.
No, and I don't want pink dragons in my neighborhood, but since neither exist, I think we're good.isadore;1204359 wrote:why do you want to have killer dogs running loose in our communities?
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Jun 19, 2012 10:07am
but Pit Bulls seeking out the young and the weak to kill. I realize a dozen dead people, half of them children is "small potatoes" to you but when there are so many types of dogs who have killed no people, why keep these killers among us.O-Trap;1204355 wrote:You said "successfully." A grown man would have a higher success rate trying to kill an infant or the elderly, as they are weaker than the ages in between.
Reps for reading comprehension.
Reps for factual statements.
Only if "much" means approximately one dozen a year, using a sample of pit bull breeds in excess of 4 million registered.
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Jun 19, 2012 10:10am
OPtions: What to do if a pitbull is running loose in the park.
1. Glock
2. Wrestle with bare hands
3. Call police
4. With fire
5. Talk to owner
6. read isatard's post to see if it is dangerous
7. Start a thread. Wait for more responses from the OC
8. I'm going to out on a limb and say Get the fuck out of the park if you think it is dangerous!
I'm going with option #4
1. Glock
2. Wrestle with bare hands
3. Call police
4. With fire
5. Talk to owner
6. read isatard's post to see if it is dangerous
7. Start a thread. Wait for more responses from the OC
8. I'm going to out on a limb and say Get the fuck out of the park if you think it is dangerous!
I'm going with option #4
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 19, 2012 10:10am
1. What dogs have killed no people?isadore;1204367 wrote:but Pit Bulls seeking out the young and the weak to kill. I realize a dozen dead people, half of them children is "small potatoes" to you but when there are so many types of dogs who have killed no people, why keep these killers among us.
2. Proof that any dog "seeks out" people? Did they tell you, Caesar Milan?
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Jun 19, 2012 10:11am
but humans do not have a preference for killing the young and the old, pit bulls do as the statistics show.O-Trap;1204366 wrote:Same with humans.
Common sense, I thought I told you to leave!!!
I agree, and it applies to all dogs. Dog not on a leash? Shoot on site.
No, and I don't want pink dragons in my neighborhood, but since neither exist, I think we're good.
No pink dragons, but if your neighbor had a komodo dragon which do kill people, you may want them gone.
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Jun 19, 2012 10:12am
Are you talkin about pitbulls or Muslims here?isadore;1204367 wrote:but Pit Bulls seeking out the young and the weak to kill. I realize a dozen dead people, half of them children is "small potatoes" to you but when there are so many types of dogs who have killed no people, why keep these killers among us.
Or are you talking about Muslim Pitbulls?
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Jun 19, 2012 10:13am
they have a list of dogs who have killed, many types not on the list. The statistics show who they kill, kids.O-Trap;1204370 wrote:1. What dogs have killed no people?
2. Proof that any dog "seeks out" people? Did they tell you, Caesar Milan?
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 19, 2012 10:13am
Wrong. The statistics show that the young and old die much more easily from the same kind of attack (see the Pomeranian example from the last thread).isadore;1204372 wrote:but humans do not have a preference for killing the young and the old, pit bulls do as the statistics show.
And humans kill with intent at a much higher rate across the board. They intend to kill. Humans are bloodthirsty killers.
No pink dragons, but if your neighbor had a komodo dragon which do kill people, you may want them gone.[/QUOTE]
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jun 19, 2012 10:14am
You DO realize that pit bulls have that "Three Little Bears" sensor, right? "No...that lady is middle aged.....no...that teenage boy isn't tender enough....Ahhhh....now that 6 month old infant is JUST RIGHT !" :rolleyes:O-Trap;1204370 wrote:2. Proof that any dog "seeks out" people? Did they tell you, Caesar Milan?
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jun 19, 2012 10:14am
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jun 19, 2012 10:16am
lol does your poodle have a faggy hair cut? My parents had a poodle but just let his hair grow out all shaggy so he looked cool...well as cool as you can for being a poodlejustincredible;1204381 wrote:I should probably get rid of my vicious poodle.
http://wtkr.com/2012/05/29/poodle-attacks-pit-bull/
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Jun 19, 2012 10:17am
<B><B><BIG><BIG><CENTER>Cause of Death</CENTER></BIG></BIG></B></B> |
Number of Deaths |
Rate per 100,000 |
| <BIG><BIG>65 years and over – All causes</BIG></BIG> |
1,717,218 |
5,071.4 |
| Diseases of heart |
612,886 |
1,810.0 |
| Malignant neoplasms, including neoplasms of lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues |
386,092 |
1,140.2 |
| Cerebrovascular diseases |
140,938 |
416.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases and allied conditions |
91,624 |
270.6 |
| Pneumonia (98.5% of deaths) and Influenza (1.5%) |
73,968 |
218.4 |
| Diabetes mellitus |
46,194 |
136.4 |
| Accidents @ and adverse effects |
30,564 |
90.3 |
| ––Motor–vehicle accidents |
7,539 |
22.3 |
| ––All other accidents and adverse effects |
23,025 |
68 |
| Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome, and Nephrosis |
20,955 |
61.9 |
| Alzheimer's disease |
20,848 |
61.6 |
| Septicemia |
| 1-4 years All causes | 5,947 | 38.3 |
| 1 Accidents and adverse effects | 2,155 | 13.9 |
| . . . Motor vehicle accidents | 834 | 5.4 |
| . . . All other accidents and adverse effects | 1,321 | 8.5 |
| 2 Congenital anomalies | 633 | 4.1 |
| 3 Malignant neoplasms, including neoplasms of lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues | 440 | 2.8 |
| 4 Homicide and legal intervention | 395 | 2.5 |
| 5 Diseases of heart | 207 | 1.3 |
| 6 Pneumonia and influenze | 167 | 1.1 |
| 7 Human immunodeficiency virus infection | 149 | 1 |
| 8 Septicemia | 74 | 0.5 |
| 9 Benign neoplasms, carcinoma in situ, and neoplasms of uncertain behavior and of unspecified nature | 71 | 0.5 |
| 10 Certain conditions originating in the perinatal period | 69 | 0.4 |
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jun 19, 2012 10:17am
Nah, he's either shaggy or buzzed. When he gets buzzed they leave his ears a little poofy, but other than that he doesn't look like your normal poodle.Raw Dawgin' it;1204385 wrote:lol does your poodle have a faggy hair cut? My parents had a poodle but just let his hair grow out all shaggy so he looked cool...well as cool as you can for being a poodle
His normal look:
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Jun 19, 2012 10:18am
and Pit Bulls are instinctual killers who seek out the weakest prey for the kill.O-Trap;1204377 wrote:Wrong. The statistics show that the young and old die much more easily from the same kind of attack (see the Pomeranian example from the last thread).
And humans kill with intent at a much higher rate across the board. They intend to kill. Humans are bloodthirsty killers.
No pink dragons, but if your neighbor had a komodo dragon which do kill people, you may want them gone.