This.lhslep134;1204305 wrote:Dumb thread.
BR1986FB;1204302 wrote:Point taken. 4Ringz "Glock" comment threw me off.
Guess if you're going to try to take care of it you'll need to (and I can't believe I'm saying this) use Isadore's advice and "bare hand" it.
The gun was assumed in that it's likely the only way you're going to take down a pit before it does significant damage IF it's owner trained it as an attack dog. If he didn't you probably have nothing to worry about in the first place.
LJ;1204289 wrote:Have fun in court. Ohio law states you can only kill a dog to protect people or livestock. Cats and dogs are neither.
probably true, they are much more successful at killing the young or the aged.O-Trap;1204309 wrote:Honestly, tackle it.
People are so afraid of pitbulls because they are strong for their size and have sharp teeth, but a strong 45-pound dog is still just a 45-pound dog, and a grown man should be able to handle a 45-pound animal.
Not at all. Don't doubt that you were joking but once I saw the mention of a gun in the thread, for some reason, my brain switched to "he's gonna shoot it." After going back and looking at the top of the thread I realized that he had no intention of taking a gun. My bad....not enough coffee yet.THE4RINGZ;1204311 wrote:I think you are reading too much into my comment. My response was tongue in cheek, given the scenario described it seemed like a safe assumption that someone in the area would be carrying a handgun. No more, no less.
I would never advocate shooting a dog unless it was done humanly to put a dog out of its misery.
The decision has already been made. If a vicious dog attacks one of my children or another child in my presence, I'm going to kill it with something. I just haven't figured out with what yet.O-Trap;1204309 wrote:Honestly, tackle it.
People are so afraid of pitbulls because they are strong for their size and have sharp teeth, but a strong 45-pound dog is still just a 45-pound dog, and a grown man should be able to handle a 45-pound animal.
Yeah, I'm with isidore on this one. If a dog attacks a child, attack the dog. I would imagine most full-grown men are stronger than a dog.
Ironman92;1204266 wrote:Print off a copy of the Finals Thread and make it read it.
THE4RINGZ;1204311 wrote:I think you are reading too much into my comment. My response was tongue in cheek, given the scenario described it seemed like a safe assumption that someone in the area would be carrying a handgun. No more, no less.
I would never advocate shooting a dog unless it was done humanly to put a dog out of its misery.
As are human beings.isadore;1204314 wrote:probably true, they are much more successful at killing the young or the aged.
Bare hands. Your children will not be in any "line of fire," and I'm sure that you're strong enough to kill a 45-pound animal with your bare hands. Lowest risk to the kids, with a still-high chance of success.Steel Valley Football;1204321 wrote:The decision has already been made. If a vicious dog attacks one of my children or another child in my presence, I'm going to kill it with something. I just haven't figured out with what yet.
Why don't you contact the correct authorities or talk to the owner and prevent the entire situation. You know...like a NORMAL person would do.Steel Valley Football;1204321 wrote:The decision has already been made. If a vicious dog attacks one of my children or another child in my presence, I'm going to kill it with something. I just haven't figured out with what yet.
GTFO WITH THAT COMMON SENSE S***!!!!Automatik;1204326 wrote:Why don't you contact the correct authorities or talk to the owner and prevent the entire situation. You know...like a NORMAL person would do.
lmao...wtf is wrong with people these days. :laugh:
What wouldn't be more successful at killing the more vulnerable?isadore;1204314 wrote:probably true, they are much more successful at killing the young or the aged.
isadore wrote: probably true, they (pit bulls) are much more successful at killing the young or the aged.
No, pit bulls are most likely to kill very young and very old people. Humans are least likely to kill the very young and the very old.O-trap wrote:As are human beings.
Likely wasn't the operative word. Successful was.isadore;1204332 wrote:No, pit bulls are most likely to kill very young and very old people. Humans are least likely to kill the very young and the very old.
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0311.pdf
Actually pit bulls are most likely NOT to kill at all.isadore;1204332 wrote:No, pit bulls are most likely to kill very young and very old people. Humans are least likely to kill the very young and the very old.
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0311.pdf
obviously talking to the owner would be a waste of time.Automatik;1204326 wrote:Why don't you contact the correct authorities or talk to the owner and prevent the entire situation. You know...like a NORMAL person would do.
lmao...wtf is wrong with people these days. :laugh:
much more likely than any other type of dog.Rotinaj;1204337 wrote:Actually pit bulls are most likely NOT to kill at all.
And you know this HOW? You're VERY good at profiling people and animals.isadore;1204338 wrote:obviously talking to the owner would be a waste of time.
if the goal is killing the young or the old pit bulls are more successfulCon_Alma;1204333 wrote:Likely wasn't the operative word. Successful was.
He's the only person I have on my ignore list - i think everyone should follow suit.BR1986FB;1204340 wrote:And you know this HOW? You're VERY good at profiling people and animals.
gosh a ruddies this guy has already shown depraved indifference by bringing his killer dog among other peoples children while he plays basketball.BR1986FB;1204340 wrote:And you know this HOW? You're VERY good at profiling people and animals.