chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Mar 11, 2012 6:34pm
I say UNC, KU, Mich, and GeorgeT are top 4 seeds.
Edit--Wow I would have UM>GT
Edit--Wow I would have UM>GT
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 11, 2012 6:34pm
Yep.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 11, 2012 6:34pm
UNC waltzes through that top half
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Mar 11, 2012 6:35pm
MICHIGAN-OHIO YES.
Screw you Brady Hoke
Screw you Brady Hoke
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Mar 11, 2012 6:35pm
Ohio vs. Michigan, LOL
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Mar 11, 2012 6:35pm
Michigan vs. the actual Ohio in Nashville
GoJPM!
Posts: 799
Mar 11, 2012 6:36pm
LOL. Play in for a 12 seed. Now that's just plain dumb.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Mar 11, 2012 6:37pm
I don't think you have any idea how it works.GoJPM!;1112787 wrote:LOL. Play in for a 12 seed. Now that's just plain dumb.
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Mar 11, 2012 6:37pm
If Ohio beat Michigan that would be the best day of my life.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Mar 11, 2012 6:37pm
His head might explodechicago510;1112784 wrote:MICHIGAN-OHIO YES.
Screw you Brady Hoke
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Mar 11, 2012 6:37pm
This. Its the bubble teams not the 8 worst.Mulva;1112789 wrote:I don't think you have any idea how it works.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Mar 11, 2012 6:37pm
Drexel, Washington, Miss. State, Seton Hall don't get in.
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
Mar 11, 2012 6:38pm
I think the committee did a good job this year. The talent seem to be spread and leveled out. Unlike last year when you had teams like Ohio State, North Carolina, and Kentucky all in the same bracket smh.
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Mar 11, 2012 6:38pm
No Miami, no Drexel. But Iona?
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 11, 2012 6:38pm
Iona over Drexel. Good point Seth D. That's a farce.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Mar 11, 2012 6:41pm
Iona had 5 top-100 wins, Drexel had 3 (with 1 top-50). Both had a handful of bad losses. Don't think that's a huge issue.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 11, 2012 6:43pm
It just shows the committee doesn't watch the games.Mulva;1112803 wrote:Iona had 5 top-100 wins, Drexel had 3 (with 1 top-50). Both had a handful of bad losses. Don't think that's a huge issue.
I've seen both many times, Drexel is BETTER and in a better league. Just IMO.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Mar 11, 2012 6:44pm
Drexel was awful the first month of the season. Awful. And unfortunately for them the entire season counts.
GoJPM!
Posts: 799
Mar 11, 2012 6:45pm
I do understand how it works. Just don't agree with the NCAA's structure/formula for determining who plays these play in games and what seeds gets them. IMO, eight worse teams play for the right to play the #1 seeds. Period. Simple. I think the NCCA could have come up with eight teams to play for the 16 seeds.Mulva;1112789 wrote:I don't think you have any idea how it works.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 11, 2012 6:47pm
This just slowly weeds out the small league. With this argument, why even include them into the Tournament? That's why. Reward a small league winner over a crappy team like South Florida...GoJPM!;1112810 wrote:I do understand how it works. Just don't agree with the NCAA's structure/formula for determining who plays these play in games and what seeds gets them. IMO, eight worse teams play for the right to play the #1 seeds. Period. Simple. I think the NCCA could have come up with eight teams to play for the 16 seeds.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 11, 2012 6:47pm
Iona not even the last team in...I'm excited for the bracket show at 7...
T
The Answer
Posts: 209
Mar 11, 2012 6:48pm
A 3 seed for Georgetown seems a little high to me. Not a huge deal just didn't think they would be that high
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Mar 11, 2012 6:51pm
Mizzou the 8th, LOL
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Mar 11, 2012 6:51pm
Mizzou was the 4th #2???? WTF?
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Mar 11, 2012 6:51pm
Ohio State was the 7 overall, according to committee chair.