wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 4, 2012 10:51pm
I am probably wrong, but I don't think ALL T's are personal fouls.ytownfootball;1105284 wrote:I always thought it was, how else would it be acknowledged? Can't go out racking up six T's and a couple hand checks and still be in the game right?
Laley?
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 4, 2012 10:55pm
Yeah he's got that rule book tucked in a Penthouse under the nightstand or something...wildcats20;1105292 wrote:
Laley?
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Mar 4, 2012 10:58pm
I missed the T. What was it given for? Were there FT's shot by OSU?
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
Mar 4, 2012 10:59pm
I find it very hard to believe that this is Michigan's first Big Ten title since 1986. They have had some talent over the years. The Glen Rice team that won the National title in 89, The Five Fab, Tractor Traylor and company in the late 90s, etc.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 4, 2012 10:59pm
He was a ref.ytownfootball;1105295 wrote:Yeah he's got that rule book tucked in a Penthouse under the nightstand or something...
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 4, 2012 11:00pm
vacatedmallymal614;1105303 wrote:I find it very hard to believe that this is Michigan's first Big Ten title since 1986. They have had some talent over the years. The Glen Rice team that won the National title in 89, The Five Fab, Tractor Traylor and company in the late 90s, etc.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 4, 2012 11:00pm
lol, i knowwildcats20;1105304 wrote:He was a ref.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Mar 4, 2012 11:05pm
Well, no. Because regardless of Personal Fouls, two Technicals is an ejection.ytownfootball;1105284 wrote:I always thought it was, how else would it be acknowledged? Can't go out racking up six T's and a couple hand checks and still be in the game right?
In HS they always are, I believe same in college. Only time they are not is for "Technicality Technicals". In other words, if a player has a wrong jersey on or calls a TO when they dont have one left, they are the 6th player on the court, etc. Im pretty sure those just become team Technicals. You can get 3 of those before the coach is ejected.wildcats20;1105292 wrote:I am probably wrong, but I don't think ALL T's are personal fouls.
Laley?
I didnt see what Draymond did for the technical though.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 4, 2012 11:06pm
I didn't see the T either, I just went through the play by play from ESPN and counting the T, he had 5 fouls.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Mar 4, 2012 11:06pm
In the NBA I don't think defensive 3 seconds counts against anyone either, though a team technical is assessed.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 4, 2012 11:07pm
In game they said it was for language/unsportsmanlikeLaley23;1105310 wrote:
I didnt see what Draymond did for the technical though.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 4, 2012 11:07pm
It doesn't.ts1227;1105313 wrote:In the NBA I don't think defensive 3 seconds counts against anyone either, though a team technical is assessed.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Mar 4, 2012 11:11pm
Well, last I checked, thats a Personal as well.ytownfootball;1105315 wrote:In game they said it was for language/unsportsmanlike
The only thing I can think of is they wrongly assessed a foul to Draymond on one of the others (not the book, but TV and the guy who relays the info to 3rd partys. Ive had to run stats at a BGSU game before and they updated the stats machine with the wrong player fouling. They didnt change it until that player got his 5th and stayed in...then they realized it was wrong before). That, or the idiot running the book is just wrong or a cheat.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 4, 2012 11:20pm
Yeah the announcers have been bad this season (maybe I'm wrong I dunno) at letting the viewing audience know who the foul is on and for what reason imo. For example, I thought Sully had fouled out today when he got his 4th with 8 min. to go. They're more concerned with who is shooting and getting a replay up and sqwuaking about it, never remember it as bad as this season.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Mar 4, 2012 11:33pm
Maybe initially. But if they are wrong after the initial call its cause the scoreboard is wrong, or their stats monitor. They dont keep track of that shit themselves (obviously), so maybe at first. But if they harp on it later on, its probably a mix-up in communication with the bookkeeper and the stats keeper.ytownfootball;1105326 wrote:Yeah the announcers have been bad this season (maybe I'm wrong I dunno) at letting the viewing audience know who the foul is on and for what reason imo. For example, I thought Sully had fouled out today when he got his 4th with 8 min. to go. They're more concerned with who is shooting and getting a replay up and sqwuaking about it, never remember it as bad as this season.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Mar 4, 2012 11:35pm
Thad Matta must have talked to Bill Self before that Buford game winner. Was exactly how the Mario Chalmers play went down.
You're all welcome
You're all welcome
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 4, 2012 11:36pm
GO TO HELL.SportsAndLady;1105345 wrote:Thad Matta must have talked to Bill Self before that Buford game winner. Was exactly how the Mario Chalmers play went down.
You're all welcome
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Mar 4, 2012 11:42pm
Chalmers was a 3SportsAndLady;1105345 wrote:Thad Matta must have talked to Bill Self before that Buford game winner. Was exactly how the Mario Chalmers play went down.
You're all welcome
Buford's was a 2
Chalmers shot tied the game
Buford's shot won the game
Kansas dribbled the length of the court
OSU took it out at half court
Kansas guard tripped and lost the ball to Chalmers
OSU guard was under control and handed the ball to Buford
Other than that it was exactly like it.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Mar 4, 2012 11:43pm
It really was almost exactly the same thing though lolwildcats20;1105347 wrote:GO TO HELL.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Mar 4, 2012 11:44pm
Lol such an idiotSkyhook79;1105349 wrote:Chalmers was a 3
Buford's was a 2
Chalmers shot tied the game
Buford's shot won the game
Kansas dribbled the length of the court
OSU took it out at half court
Kansas guard tripped and lost the ball to Chalmers
OSU guard was under control and handed the ball to Buford
Other than that it was exactly like it.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Mar 5, 2012 1:11am
Big Buford stepped up and took over..
Ravenel played MUCH bigger than Sully. We looked our best with him on the floor and Sully on the bench.
Sully needs to man the fuck up.
Ravenel played MUCH bigger than Sully. We looked our best with him on the floor and Sully on the bench.
Sully needs to man the fuck up.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Mar 5, 2012 8:18am
Sully has gotten into the habit of waiting on the double team, instead of getting the ball and going. He needs to get the ball and make a quick move.hoops23;1105384 wrote:Big Buford stepped up and took over..
Ravenel played MUCH bigger than Sully. We looked our best with him on the floor and Sully on the bench.
Sully needs to man the fuck up.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Mar 5, 2012 8:21am
Looking at the play by play, he got a personal called, then after said personal, he got a technical. I am thinking the bookkeeper/scorer marked the 2 down as 1, with the understanding that the personal WAS a technical.Laley23;1105320 wrote:Well, last I checked, thats a Personal as well.
The only thing I can think of is they wrongly assessed a foul to Draymond on one of the others (not the book, but TV and the guy who relays the info to 3rd partys. Ive had to run stats at a BGSU game before and they updated the stats machine with the wrong player fouling. They didnt change it until that player got his 5th and stayed in...then they realized it was wrong before). That, or the idiot running the book is just wrong or a cheat.
H
holdingout
Posts: 585
Mar 5, 2012 8:30am
Did Duke play this weekend?ccrunner609;1105247 wrote:Syracuse might have to disagree
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Mar 5, 2012 9:40am
holdingout;1105480 wrote:Did Duke play this weekend?
reps