LJ
Posts: 16,351
Mar 11, 2012 12:39pm
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Mar 11, 2012 1:14pm
Peyton aint going outdoors in Denver to play. He needs a warm weather team like Ariz or Miami.
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Mar 11, 2012 1:41pm
Schefter:
Skyhook may jump off a bridge if this happens. Presumably they would trade Tebow. He isn't going to do them or himself any good as a backup. Yikes.One source who spoke with Manning prior to his visit with the Cardinals said "his gut is that Manning is leaning toward Denver."
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Mar 11, 2012 2:12pm
LJ;1112238 wrote:
Classy move froma classy guy. Just wish he had been able to stay healthy.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Mar 11, 2012 2:27pm
LJ;1112238 wrote:
Very cool.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 11, 2012 2:52pm
Tebow would be an ideal fit in JAX with MJD. Since they don't throw the ball anyhow he'd fit in perfectly running a spread option.IggyPride00;1112205 wrote:Mortensen and Schefter are reporting that Denver is in the lead for the Manning sweepstakes right now.
Were that to happen PFT is reporting that Shad Kahn in Jacksonville would do any and everything to trade for Tebow.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 11, 2012 2:57pm
JAX just drafted Gabbert thoughBR1986FB;1112380 wrote:Tebow would be an ideal fit in JAX with MJD. Since they don't throw the ball anyhow he'd fit in perfectly running a spread option.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 11, 2012 3:02pm
So? Carolina took Cam even though they had Jimmy Crack Corn...Gabbert, like Colt McCoy, is a bottom feeder QB in the league. Tebow would be a) an upgrade and b) would help fill up seats.robj55;1112385 wrote:JAX just drafted Gabbert though
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 11, 2012 3:50pm
You really think Tebow is an upgrade over Gabbert? Based on what?BR1986FB;1112392 wrote:So? Carolina took Cam even though they had Jimmy Crack Corn...Gabbert, like Colt McCoy, is a bottom feeder QB in the league. Tebow would be a) an upgrade and b) would help fill up seats.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 11, 2012 3:50pm
Also, Tebow's not a bottom feeder QB in the league? lol
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 11, 2012 4:12pm
Not compared to Gabbertrobj55;1112474 wrote:Also, Tebow's not a bottom feeder QB in the league? lol
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 11, 2012 4:15pm
Gabbert had a higher completion percentage as a rookie than Tebow had in his second year, while throwing for more yards. To say they aren't comparable is silly.BR1986FB;1112498 wrote:Not compared to Gabbert
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Mar 11, 2012 6:54pm
They both suck.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Mar 11, 2012 7:29pm
How many QB's have taken over a team at a 1-4 start and not only win your Division but also win a Playoff game?hoops23;1112829 wrote:They both suck.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Mar 11, 2012 7:31pm
how many qb's played every position on the team at the same time?Skyhook79;1112864 wrote:How many QB's have taken over a team at a 1-4 start and not only win your Division but also win a Playoff game?
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Mar 11, 2012 7:44pm
4 maybe 5.DeyDurkie5;1112868 wrote:how many qb's played every position on the team at the same time?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 11, 2012 7:50pm
I lol'dDeyDurkie5;1112868 wrote:how many qb's played every position on the team at the same time?
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Mar 11, 2012 11:35pm
Skyhook: slobber on tebows nob.
Everyone: tebow facts
Skyhook: no! slobber slobber
Rinse, repeat
Everyone: tebow facts
Skyhook: no! slobber slobber
Rinse, repeat
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Mar 12, 2012 12:09am
Do you get off to bashing McCoy?BR1986FB;1112392 wrote:So? Carolina took Cam even though they had Jimmy Crack Corn...Gabbert, like Colt McCoy, is a bottom feeder QB in the league. Tebow would be a) an upgrade and b) would help fill up seats.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 12, 2012 10:03am
Just mentioning the bottom feeder QB's in the league. Whether you want to think I'm going out of my way to bash him, or not, he IS one of the bottom feeder/ranked QB's in the NFL lumped in with the likes of Gabbert, Painter, etc.SportsAndLady;1113459 wrote:Do you get off to bashing McCoy?
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Mar 12, 2012 10:24am
That is not fair. McCoy doesn't have any weapons. Give him weapons and he will be a Pro bowler and the Browns will be in the Super Bowl.BR1986FB;1113537 wrote:Just mentioning the bottom feeder QB's in the league. Whether you want to think I'm going out of my way to bash him, or not, he IS one of the bottom feeder/ranked QB's in the NFL lumped in with the likes of Gabbert, Painter, etc.
/DeyDurkie'd
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Mar 12, 2012 12:49pm
put tebow on the browns and jesus wills them to win and tebow is the number 1 qb in the WORLDSkyhook79;1113546 wrote:That is not fair. McCoy doesn't have any weapons. Give him weapons and he will be a Pro bowler and the Browns will be in the Super Bowl.
/DeyDurkie'd
/skyhook
also, you give mccoy weapons and a decent line, and we will win. No doubt about it.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 12, 2012 12:51pm
DeyDurkie5;1113638 wrote:also, you give mccoy weapons and a decent line, and we will win. No doubt about it.
WAY too bold. You DON'T know that. PLENTY of doubt.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Mar 12, 2012 12:56pm
you posted that record of 3-10 in one posession games. That's with his first year starting, with no off season, in an offense with no vision and no weapons. I like McCoy with weapons, with our defense backing him.BR1986FB;1113642 wrote:WAY too bold. You DON'T know that. PLENTY of doubt.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 12, 2012 1:08pm
You can't say "no doubt about it" though like it's a lock. Just like I could very well be wrong and McCoy could blossom (highly doubtful). They could surround him with weapons and he could remain a "checkdown machine" because he remains afraid to make a mistake.DeyDurkie5;1113649 wrote:you posted that record of 3-10 in one posession games. That's with his first year starting, with no off season, in an offense with no vision and no weapons. I like McCoy with weapons, with our defense backing him.
I also think he was a MAJOR cause for that 3-10 record and I think a better QB would've had them closer to 6-7 or 7-6 in those games, if not more.