Rutgers bowl record since 2000: 5-1sjmvsfscs08;1325122 wrote:Leading from the middle, eh?
Notre Dame's bowl record since 2000 : 2-6
Curious where you have ND leading from?
Rutgers bowl record since 2000: 5-1sjmvsfscs08;1325122 wrote:Leading from the middle, eh?
The irony here is that he (Tobias/sjmvs...) is posting this stuff from the campus of THE Ohio State University, where he's receiving one of the finest educations available in this great country of ours.sleeper;1325150 wrote:Rutgers bowl record since 2000: 5-1
Notre Dame's bowl record since 2000 : 2-6
Curious where you have ND leading from?
LOL at this.Classyposter58;1323266 wrote:Who's gonna go undefeated anymore in the days of super conferences? Seriously so many good opponents in your conference. I made a ton of super conferences in NCAA Football 13(I know it's a video game) but I have years where there are no one loss teams even except for me of course
People claim the rest of the B1G sucks outside of UM and OSUsjmvsfscs08;1325122 wrote:Leading from the middle, eh?
I thought all they did was double it from 5M to 10M (which is a lot, but isn't shit compared to the ACC)Pick6;1325487 wrote:saw SDSU and Boise are exploring rejoining the MWC. Didnt the Big East implement a hefty buyout after Pitt and Syracuse bailed?
Pick6;1325138 wrote:Rutgers has as many losses as the best teams from the shithole ACC Notre Dame just signed a deal with.
ernest_t_bass;1325521 wrote:Why wouldn't Boise go PAC 12 route?
yep you wont see me defending the Maryland acquisition in terms of competitiveness. All about the $$$killer_ewok;1325523 wrote:The flip side is the B1G just extended an invite to a mid-level program from that "shithole" ACC that you speak of.
The Big East and ACC take a beating on here and elsewhere (it is warranted) and the B1G just invited teams from each. Both accepted. Rutgers is a decent football acquisition (I'm sure it was more about their market though), Maryland a decent hoops one. The B1G coulda done worse but also coulda done a lot better.
Damn it, I was hoping Maryland was going to get added to the Legends Division, so that we could keep the M,N Iowa thing going. Incase you haven't noticed, All of the M and N schools are in the Legends +Iowa. Now, it's going to be a cluster fuck trying to keep everything straight.gorocks99;1324971 wrote:Well, uh, nevermind about my map:
https://twitter.com/McMurphyESPN/status/270597775006236672
Utah and Colorado disagree. Any talks of no intentions to expand should be taken with a grain of salt.karen lotz;1325527 wrote:Because they won't get invited to the PAC 12 ever?
Pick6;1325532 wrote:Utah and Colorado disagree. Any talks of no intentions to expand should be taken with a grain of salt.
on the field they do.Crimson streak;1325534 wrote:Boise brings nothing compared to those schools
karen lotz;1325527 wrote:Because they won't get invited to the PAC 12 ever?
Pick6;1325536 wrote:on the field they do.
ernest_t_bass;1325537 wrote:I'd still push hard to garner that invite.
How hard would you push to garner it?ernest_t_bass;1325537 wrote:I'd still push hard to garner that invite.
karen lotz;1325539 wrote:If you hadn't noticed by the B1G's expansion, on the field means very little. I also don't think Boise is much better than a junior college academically. That isn't helping their case at all.
SportsAndLady;1325544 wrote:How hard would you push to garner it?
What?WebFire;1325552 wrote:With the addition of Maryland and Rutgers, the B1G will have 4 of the top 17 LOSINGest programs in college football.
And 4 of the top 7 all-time winningest programs too.WebFire;1325552 wrote:With the addition of Maryland and Rutgers, the B1G will have 4 of the top 17 LOSINGest programs in college football.