ghosthunter
Posts: 154
Dec 13, 2009 8:13pm
Now that one Heacock is unemployed, maybe there will be another one, soon?
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Dec 13, 2009 10:21pm
I've been rough on Heacock the past few years, but I have to give him some credit. He has done a great job this year.ghosthunter wrote: Now that one Heacock is unemployed, maybe there will be another one, soon?
For me, any talk of coach hiring/firing has to be centered on Bollman. I know, I know he doesn't call plays, but once they fire him they need to get somebody who CAN call plays and get Tress to just oversee things.
C
Crimson_Streak
Posts: 172
Dec 13, 2009 11:11pm
i am hoping Brian Kelly will be able to get Chris Martin to recommit back to the irish. we need all the defensive recruits we can get
R
rocket31
Posts: 460
Dec 13, 2009 11:19pm
kelly has been on the horn with recruits today
http://twitter.com/CoachBrianKelly
and unfortunately, he had his house egged last night by those all so *classy* cincinnati fans
http://twitter.com/CoachBrianKelly
and unfortunately, he had his house egged last night by those all so *classy* cincinnati fans
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 13, 2009 11:31pm
at least he has a good sense of humor about the whole thing, he said scrambled eggs were a side dish at dinner
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Dec 13, 2009 11:32pm
It is never right to egg somebody's house, but Kelly had to figure that he was going to be on the receiving end of some nasty treatment. WVU fans were rough on Rich Rod in the days after he took the Michigan job. If I remember correctly, Rich Rod's young nephew was getting threatened.rocket31 wrote: kelly has been on the horn with recruits today
http://twitter.com/CoachBrianKelly
and unfortunately, he had his house egged last night by those all so *classy* cincinnati fans
People are crazy
B
bo shemmy3337
Posts: 962
Dec 14, 2009 12:01am
OSU is going to move up but the way these rankings come to be will make it impossible for OSU to get in the top 25. They simply do not have enough scholarships left to be able to make a huge jump. I think they will be somewhere around 10 when it is all said and done. If a team signs 30 guys they have a higher rated class then a team with better players and only 18 guys. It is wrong and should be looked at team needs and not total amount of stars.
B
bo shemmy3337
Posts: 962
Dec 14, 2009 12:04am
rocket31 wrote: kelly has been on the horn with recruits today
http://twitter.com/CoachBrianKelly
and unfortunately, he had his house egged last night by those all so *classy* cincinnati fans
Cincy fans throw eggs and West Virgina fans give out death threats. (RR and his family) You be the judge.
O
OldDanTucker
Posts: 283
Dec 14, 2009 4:20am
I hope UM can bring in Josh Furman 4* saftey from Maryland 6'2 200lbs with 4.36 speed good rb for his school to
H
hrspeedmerchant
Posts: 165
Dec 14, 2009 7:19am
Eleven of the top fourteen teams are located in warm weather parts of the country. Say what you will, but playing in the South or West is attractive to recruits. Yes, those teams have history going for them, but don't discount the weather as being a factor.
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Dec 14, 2009 8:00am
I hope you don't think those forty times on rivals are accurate.OldDanTucker wrote: I hope UM can bring in Josh Furman 4* saftey from Maryland 6'2 200lbs with 4.36 speed good rb for his school to
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Dec 14, 2009 11:00am
Painting Cincinnati fans with that broad brush would be equivlalent as saying all Notre Dame fans molest young boys.rocket31 wrote: kelly has been on the horn with recruits today
http://twitter.com/CoachBrianKelly
and unfortunately, he had his house egged last night by those all so *classy* cincinnati fans
M
Mr Pat
Posts: 519
Dec 14, 2009 12:26pm
Wow... Wouldn't say it's the same thing though.queencitybuckeye wrote:Painting Cincinnati fans with that broad brush would be equivlalent as saying all Notre Dame fans molest young boys.rocket31 wrote: kelly has been on the horn with recruits today
http://twitter.com/CoachBrianKelly
and unfortunately, he had his house egged last night by those all so *classy* cincinnati fans
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Dec 14, 2009 12:35pm
In terms of severity, of course not.Mr Pat wrote: [Wow... Wouldn't say it's the same thing though.
In terms of painting a large group based on the actions of a small number of people, it's exactly the same.
R
rocket31
Posts: 460
Dec 14, 2009 12:55pm
"those" classy cincy fans whom did the egging is what i was referring too.
only a tard would believe i was referring to the entire cincy fan base at *large" egging one individuals home...
only a tard would believe i was referring to the entire cincy fan base at *large" egging one individuals home...
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Dec 14, 2009 1:25pm
Only an semi-literate would have written it that way.rocket31 wrote: only a tard would believe i was referring to the entire cincy fan base at *large" egging one individuals home...
R
rocket31
Posts: 460
Dec 14, 2009 1:38pm
my sincere apologies for leading you wrong, however, i feel no need to argue semantics.queencitybuckeye wrote:
Only an semi-literate would have written it that way.
certainly, i realize there are runts in each litter of football fan base (yes, even at notre dame). the cincy ones are just more prominent these days then ever before...
M
Mr Pat
Posts: 519
Dec 14, 2009 6:51pm
Still disagree with you. I'm assuming you're going off the scandal that hit the Catholic Church and their priests. Unless you talked to these priests and found out they were Notre Dame fans, your statement is still wrong. I know people like to be edgy and throw out hip and cool things like child molestation, but it doesn't fit here. No matter how much you patted yourself on the back for it.queencitybuckeye wrote:In terms of severity, of course not.Mr Pat wrote: [Wow... Wouldn't say it's the same thing though.
In terms of painting a large group based on the actions of a small number of people, it's exactly the same.
F
FairwoodKing
Posts: 2,504
Dec 14, 2009 7:33pm
It's "who" and not "whom," "are" and not "is," and "to" and not "too." Is that your fine Notre Dame education showing?rocket31 wrote: "those" classy cincy fans whom did the egging is what i was referring too.
only a tard would believe i was referring to the entire cincy fan base at *large" egging one individuals home...
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Dec 14, 2009 9:10pm
It was a cheap shot, and I apologize to rocket, you, and the readers of the thread. My point was (I believe) valid, but I used a terrible comparison.Mr Pat wrote:Still disagree with you. I'm assuming you're going off the scandal that hit the Catholic Church and their priests. Unless you talked to these priests and found out they were Notre Dame fans, your statement is still wrong. I know people like to be edgy and throw out hip and cool things like child molestation, but it doesn't fit here. No matter how much you patted yourself on the back for it.queencitybuckeye wrote:In terms of severity, of course not.Mr Pat wrote: [Wow... Wouldn't say it's the same thing though.
In terms of painting a large group based on the actions of a small number of people, it's exactly the same.
M
Mr Pat
Posts: 519
Dec 14, 2009 11:04pm
I agree with your point, it is very silly (and stupid) to paint an entire group of people based on a few and you were right to take issue with the statement. Anyways, no harm done my good man.