AFC Championship Game - Baltimore Ravens at New England Patriots

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ AFC Championship Game - Baltimore Ravens at New England Patriots
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:20 PM
september63;1062272 wrote:They didnt look at it. They ran the next play within the normal 45 second clock. That wouldnt be enough time to view replays of the catch/drop.

They did look at it. They didnt review it. They look at every play under 2 min
Jan 22, 2012 6:20pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:20 PM
LJ;1062279 wrote:They did look at it. They didnt review it. They look at every play under 2 min
Everyone SHUT THE FUCK UP! The all knowing LJ has spoken.

/sarcasm
Jan 22, 2012 6:20pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:21 PM
ts1227;1062271 wrote:Either way, it's after the play. All it would have changed is where NE took a knee, I think. Rudd's was before a whistle back in the day, no?
True.
Jan 22, 2012 6:21pm
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:21 PM
Skyhook79;1062253 wrote:How do you know they didn't look at it and say he didn't complete the catch all the way thru no need for a review?

Great game though.
They probably did a quick review, but I'm saying take time to thoroughly consider it. Doesn't the ref on the field make the final decision when he goes to review? Need to let him decide that important of a play.

I know you have to prove possession by maintaining possession thru a collision with the ground, if you have one, but coming in and stripping it doesn't prove you didn't have valid possession after you took three steps with the ball on which the play should be over once you have possession beyond the plane. Now if that play happened at the 20 yd line, I'll bet they would rule a fumble!
Jan 22, 2012 6:21pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:21 PM
september63;1062272 wrote:They didnt look at it. They ran the next play within the normal 45 second clock. That wouldnt be enough time to view replays of the catch/drop.
They look at everything under 2:00. The one or two shots they saw (the ones we saw on TV) were pretty obvious, thus no reason to look at more or buzz the ref.
Jan 22, 2012 6:21pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:22 PM
like_that;1062280 wrote:Everyone SHUT THE FUCK UP! The all knowing LJ has spoken.

/sarcasm
He is right this time though, lol
Jan 22, 2012 6:22pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:23 PM
At least Brady is honest (about sucking today)...
Jan 22, 2012 6:23pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:23 PM
As for the TD/Drop. I didnt even think it was a question he dropped it/had it stripped. Isnt the stupid endzone rule that you gotta complete the catch or whatever?
Jan 22, 2012 6:23pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:23 PM
Belichick said Jim I knew you'd be there, I didn't know we would be there referring to the Super Bowl.

Except the game is on NBC.
Jan 22, 2012 6:23pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:24 PM
ts1227;1062285 wrote:He is right this time though, lol
They ran the next play right away. I have my doubts they had enough time to review the tape in order to make a decision.
Jan 22, 2012 6:24pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:24 PM
like_that;1062280 wrote:Everyone SHUT THE FUCK UP! The all knowing LJ has spoken.

/sarcasm

Gee, thanks for the personal attack :rolleyes:
Jan 22, 2012 6:24pm
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:29 PM
landshark0731;1054214 wrote:Hey skyjack! Hope this helps if rice doesn't hit 100 they have little chance. Btw how did your teboner do this week?
Rice only had 67 yds rushing on 22 carries and they had a great shot at winning and they would have won had Evans held on to the ball.
Jan 22, 2012 6:29pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:31 PM
like_that;1062291 wrote:They ran the next play right away. I have my doubts they had enough time to review the tape in order to make a decision.
They didn't rush the play by any means. Plus, all they had to look at was the one straight on view and it was obvious. It takes like 3 seconds.
Jan 22, 2012 6:31pm
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:31 PM
bigdaddy2003;1054229 wrote:The Ravens offense will play better than it did today. If the D gets to Brady and ruffles his feathers it should be a close game. If the Pats blow them out I will get on here and eat crow but I don't see it happening.
Reps
Jan 22, 2012 6:31pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:32 PM
Laley23;1062287 wrote:As for the TD/Drop. I didnt even think it was a question he dropped it/had it stripped. Isnt the stupid endzone rule that you gotta complete the catch or whatever?
Yes, and I didn't think there was much doubt about it either.
Jan 22, 2012 6:32pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:36 PM
Mulva;1062302 wrote:Yes, and I didn't think there was much doubt about it either.
Neither did Mike Perriera:

ProFootballTalk ProFootballTalk

From @MikePereira via text on Evans non-catch: "Clearly not a catch. . . . No need to review it because it was clearly incomplete."
Jan 22, 2012 6:36pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:42 PM
Yeah, I'm not sure how anyone could think that was even close to a catch.
Jan 22, 2012 6:42pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:44 PM
justincredible;1062315 wrote:Yeah, I'm not sure how anyone could think that was even close to a catch.
and three steps? I saw one and the 2nd coming down as it was stripped. But I only watched the game replays. Didnt go back myself.
Jan 22, 2012 6:44pm
IggyPride00's avatar

IggyPride00

Senior Member

6,482 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:45 PM
Still boggles my mind that Bill Belichek has literally turned into the greatest coach in NFL history after how his stint in Cleveland went.

5 Super Bowl appearances since 2001, 3 Titles (maybe soon to be 4) it is amazing.
Jan 22, 2012 6:45pm
Heelz's avatar

Heelz

Senior Member

780 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:45 PM
Man that sucks, that is all.
Jan 22, 2012 6:45pm
bigdaddy2003's avatar

bigdaddy2003

Senior Member

7,384 posts
Jan 22, 2012 6:59 PM
Heelz;1062321 wrote:Man that sucks, that is all.
Yes it does. Flacco shows up, most of the rest of the offense shows up, the D shows up, and Billy Cundiff ruins the day.

Also someone give George the Texans' fan reps for his prediction that the Patriots would win by 21+.
Jan 22, 2012 6:59pm
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Jan 22, 2012 7:03 PM
I guess receivers need to be taught to spike it ASAP, then they get the TD!
Jan 22, 2012 7:03pm
L

landshark0731

Senior Member

273 posts
Jan 22, 2012 7:06 PM
Skyhook79;1062297 wrote:Rice only had 67 yds rushing on 22 carries and they had a great shot at winning and they would have won had Evans held on to the ball.
Yea had a chance but didn't get close enough to 100. Cameron is an awful playcaller,hopefully Harbaugh let's him go. Pats did enough to win. Was a great game!
Jan 22, 2012 7:06pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Jan 22, 2012 7:33 PM
The thread was removed from the Ravens Scout.com message board but their fans were calling for a "bounty" on Cundiff and his family.
Jan 22, 2012 7:33pm
Z

Zombaypirate

Senior Member

581 posts
Jan 22, 2012 7:46 PM
BR1986FB;1062407 wrote:The thread was removed from the Ravens Scout.com message board but their fans were calling for a "bounty" on Cundiff and his family.
HAHAHAHAHA. That is great. I will sleep extra good tonight knowing the loss hurts them so bad they need to put a bounty on a kicker. Play better ball Baltimore don't blame the kicker. Brady did not have a great game and you still lost to a team with the 31st ranked defense.
Jan 22, 2012 7:46pm