Dominic Clarke facing OVI charge

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Dominic Clarke facing OVI charge
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Jan 13, 2012 12:32 PM
WebFire;1050905 wrote:This is a troll thread fail. Pretty bad when a Michigan fan recognizes it. ;)
reps :thumbup:
Jan 13, 2012 12:32pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Jan 13, 2012 12:33 PM
WebFire;1050905 wrote:This is a troll thread fail. Pretty bad when a Michigan fan recognizes it. ;)
SoS will just call you a troll, since that is how he responds to anyone that says he is trolling.
Jan 13, 2012 12:33pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Jan 13, 2012 12:57 PM
This thread is a shining example of a basement worthy addition. Not sure what distinguishes it from others that end up there as a result of its' trolling nature, and I don't care just pointing that out. I'd actually prefer it stay here to illustrate the aching nature of sandyvag's anus.
Jan 13, 2012 12:57pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:07 PM
LMAO, its fine to have a thread about a Michigan player getting 10 days in jail, but if I start a thread about a Buckeye arrest, its trolling. :laugh::D:thumbup::rolleyes:
Jan 13, 2012 1:07pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:10 PM
Yep...it was already being talked about within a thread a day earlier. Go ahead and tell me how you weren't aware of it now :rolleyes:
Jan 13, 2012 1:10pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:12 PM
ytownfootball;1050997 wrote:Yep...it was already being talked about within a thread a day earlier. Go ahead and tell me how you weren't aware of it now :rolleyes:
Well, sos isn't the brightest of posters, so he does have an excuse :p
Jan 13, 2012 1:12pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:18 PM
vball10set;1051001 wrote:Well, sos isn't the brightest of posters, so he does have an excuse :p
So did the special needs chick who derped all over the bus and she still got an elbow to the pie hole...just sayin'.
Jan 13, 2012 1:18pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:20 PM
crytown, I don't read every thread, and I can honestly say I had not read that one. At all. I was fishing in Mosquito Lagoon all day the day before.
Now tell me how this is the first time there has ever been a duplicate thread.
Jan 13, 2012 1:20pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:21 PM
Safe to say Clarke is done as a Buckeye?
Jan 13, 2012 1:21pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:22 PM
Automatik;1051029 wrote:Safe to say Clarke is done as a Buckeye?
No.
Jan 13, 2012 1:22pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:23 PM
Well he should be. Send him packing.
Jan 13, 2012 1:23pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:23 PM
Automatik;1051029 wrote:Safe to say Clarke is done as a Buckeye?
LJ;1051031 wrote:No.
This
Jan 13, 2012 1:23pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:25 PM
Automatik;1051032 wrote:Well he should be. Send him packing.
Maybe if it was his 2nd DUI or something like that. The BB gun thing was just stupid and honestly ridiculous he got charged DC for it. He will probably get a couple game suspension and all that good shit.
Jan 13, 2012 1:25pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:26 PM
Automatik;1051029 wrote:Safe to say Clarke is done as a Buckeye?
I'm not sure. Given this is the first off field issue UM has to deal with it will say a lot about how things will be handled in the future. The BB gun thing was really a minor thing but an issue nonetheless, but the OVI thing (though reported "low level") is a lot more serious. More because I assume he's not of age and .02 is the threshold level for OVI of a person not 21. Hard to tell which way he goes imo.
Jan 13, 2012 1:26pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:28 PM
ytownfootball;1051042 wrote:I'm not sure. Given this is the first off field issue UM has to deal with it will say a lot about how things will be handled in the future. The BB gun thing was really a minor thing but an issue nonetheless, but the OVI thing (though reported "low level") is a lot more serious. More because I assume he's not of age and .02 is the threshold level for OVI of a person not 21. Hard to tell which way he goes imo.
Yeah if he was under .08 I say the penalty is less. 1 beer puts someone his size at like .04. Meyer said yesterday that he is not looking to make an example out of anyone.
Jan 13, 2012 1:28pm
stroups's avatar

stroups

Senior Member

3,223 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:40 PM
Higher level OMVI's are .17 and up so I would assume anything below that would be a lower level.
Jan 13, 2012 1:40pm
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:49 PM
LJ;1050912 wrote:SoS will just call you a troll, since that is how he responds to anyone that says he is trolling.
I've gotten the idea that he either has no concept of what trolling actually is OR he just has no self awareness. Kinda reminds me of one woman in my office, who constantly complains and gossips about people while also saying she doesn't like drama. Brings the lulz on a daily basis.
Jan 13, 2012 1:49pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Jan 13, 2012 1:54 PM
Speedofsand;1050991 wrote:LMAO, its fine to have a thread about a Michigan player getting 10 days in jail, but if I start a thread about a Buckeye arrest, its trolling. :laugh::D:thumbup::rolleyes:
While the intend of the Stonum thread was troll-like, it hadn't been discussed yet. But yours were way late, having already been discussed for like 3 days now.
Jan 13, 2012 1:54pm
O

Oldman82

Member

68 posts
Jan 13, 2012 2:00 PM
Is this the first blemish of the Urban Meyer regime?
Jan 13, 2012 2:00pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Jan 13, 2012 2:00 PM
WebFire;1051096 wrote:While the intend of the Stonum thread was troll-like, it hadn't been discussed yet. But yours were way late, having already been discussed for like 3 days now.
Wrong. It was mentioned inside a thread the day before my thread. Not 3 days. Not that I really care, just tired of people spinning my posts. Besides, the espn story was new. He went to court yesterday.
Jan 13, 2012 2:00pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Jan 13, 2012 2:05 PM
Speedofsand;1051109 wrote:Wrong. It was mentioned inside a thread the day before my thread. Not 3 days. Not that I really care, just tired of people spinning my posts.
Here's the deal Einstein, I saw the news a day or two before you posted a thread about it, I was going to post a thread about it myself, but as most posters with half a walnut do, I checked the thread that was most likely to have news of it already being discussed, and wa la, there it was. You were simply too focused on trying to post around the wood you had to do so...you fail. Simple as that.
Jan 13, 2012 2:05pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Jan 13, 2012 2:26 PM
Speedofsand;1051109 wrote:Wrong. It was mentioned inside a thread the day before my thread. Not 3 days. Not that I really care, just tired of people spinning my posts. Besides, the espn story was new. He went to court yesterday.
"3 days now." Wedesday, Thursday, Friday.

When you posted, it had been discussed for more than 24 hours and you didn't bother to check. And don't tell me your sole intention wasn't trolling.
Jan 13, 2012 2:26pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Jan 13, 2012 2:27 PM
ytownfootball;1051120 wrote:Here's the deal Einstein, I saw the news a day or two before you posted a thread about it, I was going to post a thread about it myself, but as most posters with half a walnut do, I checked the thread that was most likely to have news of it already being discussed, and wa la, there it was.
*viola Einstein. As I said, I don't read every thread here. He pleaded not guilty yesterday. So, I win and you fail again.
Jan 13, 2012 2:27pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Jan 13, 2012 2:32 PM
WebFire;1051168 wrote:"3 days now." Wedesday, Thursday, Friday.

When you posted, it had been discussed for more than 24 hours and you didn't bother to check. And don't tell me your sole intention wasn't trolling.
"But yours were way late, having already been discussed for like 3 days now."
barely 24 hours is not already 3 days. Thanks for failing.
Jan 13, 2012 2:32pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Jan 13, 2012 2:36 PM
Speedofsand;1051183 wrote:barely 24 hours is not already 3 days. Thanks for failing.
It was posted Wed, this is the 3rd day on this website that this topic has been discussed.
Jan 13, 2012 2:36pm