hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Jan 9, 2012 10:33pm
Skyhook79;1045989 wrote:What part of back-up don't you understand? If he was so good he would be starting.
Moreno and Willis have the exact same career yds per carry 4.1. Moreno is no slouch.
Mcgahee is the better rb for this team
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 9, 2012 10:36pm
They are both good and you need at least 2 good RB's to not burn one out and wear down defenses.pnhasbeen;1046024 wrote:Mcgahee is the better rb for this team
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Jan 9, 2012 10:41pm
Skyhook79;1046043 wrote:They are both good and you need at least 2 good RB's to not burn one out and wear down defenses.
Tebow and mcgahee.
Moreno wouldn't affect the outcome. Ball is serviceable.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 9, 2012 10:52pm
pnhasbeen;1046065 wrote:Tebow and mcgahee.
Moreno wouldn't affect the outcome. Ball is serviceable.
Exactly. Moreno and Kuper wouldnt change a thing. Lol look at Skyhook trying to use meaningless injuries as an excuse as to why they lost to KC
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 9, 2012 10:58pm
I didn't say anything about why they lost to KC, I was disputing your claim that they were not missing any key performers.LJ;1046129 wrote:Exactly. Moreno and Kuper wouldnt change a thing. Lol look at Skyhook trying to use meaningless injuries as an excuse as to why they lost to KC
Not surprised it went over your head though.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 9, 2012 11:01pm
Skyhook79;1046160 wrote:I didn't say anything about why they lost to KC, I was disputing your claim that they were not missing any key performers.
Not surprised it went over your head though.
Moreno, not key
Kuper, not key
Dawkins, not key to why they lost.
Get it this time, or you going to start blabbering again?
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Jan 9, 2012 11:02pm
Skyhook79;1046160 wrote:I didn't say anything about why they lost to KC, I was disputing your claim that they were not missing any key performers.
Not surprised it went over your head though.
The only guy missing that might have mattered is Dawkins.
Kupers back up did fine against the shit d line for pitt. Moreno, again, wouldn't have done little.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 9, 2012 11:16pm
Too bad you don't get to decide who is key and not key for Denver.LJ;1046169 wrote:Moreno, not key
Kuper, not key
Dawkins, not key to why they lost.
Get it this time, or you going to start blabbering again?
Try and figure out why your team lost to an 8-8 team with Tim Tebow as the QB.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 9, 2012 11:17pm
Skyhook79;1046254 wrote:Too bad you don't get to decide who is key and not key for Denver.
Try and figure out why your team lost to an 8-8 team with Tim Tebow as the QB.
I already know why. Read the thread, I went over it a few times.
And too bad your opinion means just as much as mine on who is and isnt a key player.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jan 9, 2012 11:26pm
* Every team has injuries that are key.
* Denver deserved to win based on their performance....Denver was the better team.
* Denver was uber smarter.
* Pittsburgh had far more missing players/injury issues.
Denying any of these things is ridiculous....but have at it.
* Denver deserved to win based on their performance....Denver was the better team.
* Denver was uber smarter.
* Pittsburgh had far more missing players/injury issues.
Denying any of these things is ridiculous....but have at it.
Speedofsand
Posts: 5,529
Jan 10, 2012 12:13am
Pitt had 5 starters out and a gimpy QB. Their leading tackler and 2 sudden losses on defense. Mendenhall, and Pouncey which I hated to see because Maurkice is really cool. What happened to Starks and Gilbert on Pitt's Oline?
W
wgh raider
Posts: 121
Jan 10, 2012 2:22am
starks went out early with an injured knee that may require surgery.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Jan 10, 2012 9:28am
Why are people arguing about the KC and Broncos game?
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 10, 2012 9:33am
Because LJ is bitter that the steelers lost to a team that 7-9 KC "kicked the shit out of" a week earlier.Rotinaj;1046701 wrote:Why are people arguing about the KC and Broncos game?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 10, 2012 9:34am
Not true at all....Skyhook79;1046707 wrote:Because LJ is bitter that the steelers lost to a team that 7-9 KC "kicked the shit out of" a week earlier.
Way to make shit up :thumbup:
But hey, whatever gets your Tebowner going again!
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jan 10, 2012 9:36am
Just curious, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and not tried to be a douche and look for an argument?
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 10, 2012 9:42am
better question, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and had a solid argument?like_that;1046713 wrote:Just curious, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and not tried to be a douche and look for an argument?
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 10, 2012 10:16am
Several times. The Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning argument comes to mind.Raw Dawgin' it;1046724 wrote:better question, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and had a solid argument?
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 10, 2012 10:17am
Who brought up the KC vs Denver game in the steelers vs Broncos thread?:rolleyes:LJ;1046709 wrote:Not true at all....
Way to make shit up :thumbup:
But hey, whatever gets your Tebowner going again!
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 10, 2012 10:19am
I suggest you go thru my 3595 posts and come up with a flow chart and in depth analysis.like_that;1046713 wrote:Just curious, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and not tried to be a douche and look for an argument?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 10, 2012 10:19am
SoSSkyhook79;1046772 wrote:Who brought up the KC vs Denver game in the steelers vs Broncos thread?:rolleyes:
Did I use it the last 3 weeks?
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 10, 2012 10:26am
Not seeing KC any where in that post. You chose to bring them in and you were wrong about having their key players.LJ;1046775 wrote:SoS did I use it the last 3 weeks
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 10, 2012 10:28am
KC wasn't one of the last 3 they lost?Skyhook79;1046790 wrote:Not seeing KC any where in that post. You chose to bring them in
Not at all. They had their QB, their top WR's, their top RB and not only 4/5's of their line, but a backup who is just plain good enough.and you were wrong about having their key players.
gorocks99
Posts: 10,760
Jan 10, 2012 12:31pm
[video=youtube;m5OAGHXc1ZU][/video]
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Jan 10, 2012 12:46pm
Sometimes, that's all a person has.like_that;1046713 wrote:Just curious, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and not tried to be a douche and look for an argument?