Mr Miyagi;1103610 wrote:Shurmur talks up Tannehill
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/02/browns-coach-pat-shurmur-talks-up-ryan-tannehill/
i hope soMidstate01;1103633 wrote:Smokescreen. Or it fucking better be. I'll lose my mind if the browns take him. IF YOU HAVE TO pick a QB. It better fucking be griffin!
Mr Miyagi;1103634 wrote:Since the Saints do not have a 1st rounder this year, and the talk is that the Saints will be punished worse than the Pats for spygate, it was suggested that the league should take away their franchise tag this year.....that would make Brees avaiable to the highest bidder.....not saying we would go for him but it would turn this whole QB situation/draft/Peyton Manning situation on its ear
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/02/league-should-consider-taking-saints-franchise-tag/
Also they think they are willing to let their Pro Bowl guard Nicks go http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/02/nicks-hasnt-gotten-an-offer-yet/
Ordinarily at this time of year I would immediately think "smoke screen", but from everything we know about this regime and what they are looking for in players I think they would love to find a way to get him.Mr Miyagi;1103610 wrote:Shurmur talks up Tannehill
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/02/browns-coach-pat-shurmur-talks-up-ryan-tannehill/
I'm sure BR could make a case that anyone is better than McCoyFootwedge;1103698 wrote:Someone needs to explain to me how Tannehill is better than Colt McCoy. Kellen Moore is better than Tannehill for God sake.
Actually I have stated that I think Tannehill is potentially Derek Anderson Jr but nice try. BTW....it's 12:26pm and McCoy STILL sucks.derek bomar;1103814 wrote:I'm sure BR could make a case that anyone is better than McCoy
that is a sick, sick burnBR1986FB;1103816 wrote:BTW....it's 12:26pm and McCoy STILL sucks.
I know, not my best. I should just let his play speak for itself.SportsAndLady;1103818 wrote:that is a sick, sick burn
wouldn't mind seeing this happendazedconfused;1103922 wrote:With brees getting the tag, the browns need to throw everything they got at carl nicks...line definitely needs improved
Weird , that is exactly the same # of QB's that were picked before Tom Brady was. hmmmFootwedge;1103924 wrote:Tannehil's career completion percentage was a puny 63% in a relatively easy defensive conference. Not even close to McCoy. In addition, Tannehill and A&M played only 2 teams with a good defense last season. The result? Against Oklahoma and and Texas, Tannehill completed a putrid 46% of his passes, 6 of which were picked off.
There are 6 quarterbacks that are better than this guy in this year's draft. For him to travel up the mock boards like this has to do with crooked touts like Kuiper, who must be getting their pockets lined behind the scenes.
BR1986FB;1104279 wrote:http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/31a15698-368b-587c-ac57-a4f60ed69a44.html#ixzz1o96sg9Jd
http://www.cleveland.com/pluto/blog/index.ssf/2012/03/terry_plutos_talkin_about_peyt.html
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/dungy-gregg-williams-redskins-may-started-peyton-manning-163634407.html
The third article is especially interesting. Highly doubtful it happens but what if Goodell investigates Gregg Williams back that far and decides to take the Redskins 1st rounder this year?[/QUOTE]
That would be ideal, any help we can get.
I really want RG3 but I fear that the Skins offer is just going to be too much for the Rams to pass
If you look at the first article, I really don't think it's going to cost "the farm" to get him. The Browns are in the drivers seat IF they want him. Now the questions are whether they do and how much they are willing to bid. I don't think it's going to be multiple 1sts. According to that article, they aren't willing to part with the 22 yet.KR1245;1104283 wrote: That would be ideal, any help we can get.
I really want RG3 but I fear that the Skins offer is just going to be too much for the Rams to pass
KR1245;1104283 wrote:I hope it happens. Goodell might be cranky enough to do it too. If it happens, the Browns definitely will be in position to get RG3, and it won't be as much, because I don't think any other team was willing to be as dumb as the redskins and give up as much as they were going to give up.BR1986FB;1104279 wrote:http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/31a15698-368b-587c-ac57-a4f60ed69a44.html#ixzz1o96sg9Jd
http://www.cleveland.com/pluto/blog/index.ssf/2012/03/terry_plutos_talkin_about_peyt.html
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/dungy-gregg-williams-redskins-may-started-peyton-manning-163634407.html
The third article is especially interesting. Highly doubtful it happens but what if Goodell investigates Gregg Williams back that far and decides to take the Redskins 1st rounder this year?[/QUOTE]
That would be ideal, any help we can get.
I really want RG3 but I fear that the Skins offer is just going to be too much for the Rams to pass
like_that;1104296 wrote:Another good point was brought up. If the league starts investigating the Skins, would the Rams be reluctant to deal with them for 2013 high draft choices if the Skins could eventually have to forfeit them if an investigation hasn't been completed? For instance, if WASH offers a 1st & a 2nd this year along a 1st & 3rd next year, could they have to forfeit next years 1st?KR1245;1104283 wrote:
I hope it happens. Goodell might be cranky enough to do it too. If it happens, the Browns definitely will be in position to get RG3, and it won't be as much, because I don't think any other team was willing to be as dumb as the redskins and give up as much as they were going to give up.
