shook_17;1325360 wrote:Whos better Matt Barkley? Geno Smith? Hell no.
shook_17;1323001 wrote:
I still think weeden can be the guy. He is better than any qb coming out in this draft
ahh. My bad, but i do think with this whole year with Weeden starting, he gives us a better option winning next year than Barkely or Smith. I am not impressed with those two. So we go into next year with Weeds add a few pieces then the following year if Weeds doesn't pan out we draft our guy. I just hate to burn a first round pick if he isn't a sure fire all pro.lhslep134;1325431 wrote:No, you said Weeden is better than any QB in this draft. And that's what I was responding to.
I was literally just about to post this.shook_17;1325459 wrote:http://www.cleveland.com/pluto/blog/index.ssf/2012/11/in_an_almost_season_for_the_cl.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
nice read. very true.
Great minds think alike i suppose.like_that;1325461 wrote:I was literally just about to post this.
Exact same shit that got said last year. "Almost always almost winning" just means you always lose.shook_17;1325459 wrote:http://www.cleveland.com/pluto/blog/index.ssf/2012/11/in_an_almost_season_for_the_cl.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
nice read. very true.
We're 27th in the NFL in rushing and our #3 overall pick averages 3.7 yards per carry. They're productive in 1 phase of the offense. Unfortunately there are 2.The offensive line is productive
The realgm site above has a kid from Ada ranked above Matt Barkley.shook_17;1325360 wrote:Whos better Matt Barkley? Geno Smith? Hell no.
LOL!!shook_17;1325464 wrote:Great minds think alike i suppose.
I didn't ask. Did anyone else?IggyPride00;1325623 wrote:
What are those 4 numbers you may ask?
Maybe weeds will be here next year :thumbup:BR1986FB;1325921 wrote:Rumor floating around that the Browns have hired Bernie Kosar as a special assistant to Brandon Weeden.
If this rumor is true, and the hiring move was made by Haslam/Banner vs Shurmur/Heckert, I'd have to believe that they see enough of him to try to develop him another year. Could be wrong but that would seem to be the direction they were pointing.shook_17;1325980 wrote:Maybe weeds will be here next year :thumbup:
He will have to be God awful the last 6 games not to be back next year.BR1986FB;1325983 wrote:If this rumor is true, and the hiring move was made by Haslam/Banner vs Shurmur/Heckert, I'd have to believe that they see enough of him to try to develop him another year. Could be wrong but that would seem to be the direction they were pointing.
Pretty much agree with everything you said here.IggyPride00;1326042 wrote:He will have to be God awful the last 6 games not to be back next year.
Getting a QB better than what he is doing through free agency won't happen.
Without a 2nd round pick, there is no way the organization will burn another first round pick on a QB who at best would be a marginal upgrade over Weeden. Taking another QB would mean that we didn't address any of the gaping defensive holes (secondary) with an impact player in the 1st round.
When you look at the entire picture it points to Weeden getting one more year next year as there just isn't a real good alternative to replace him with that could step in and give more production than they are getting from him.
I am still hopeful that whoever the next coach is will play more to his strengths and hurry up the offense and let him throw down field more.
Dysert from Miami (OH)? It'd be cool to see him make it in the league. And even more cool to watch the overhyped Barkley get passed over by QBs left and right when draft time rolls around.Sonofanump;1325555 wrote:The realgm site above has a kid from Ada ranked above Matt Barkley.
Couldn't agree more. I would have to believe they go defense with their 1st pick and give Weeden another year with better coaching.IggyPride00;1326042 wrote:He will have to be God awful the last 6 games not to be back next year.
Getting a QB better than what he is doing through free agency won't happen.
Without a 2nd round pick, there is no way the organization will burn another first round pick on a QB who at best would be a marginal upgrade over Weeden. Taking another QB would mean that we didn't address any of the gaping defensive holes (secondary) with an impact player in the 1st round.
When you look at the entire picture it points to Weeden getting one more year next year as there just isn't a real good alternative to replace him with that could step in and give more production than they are getting from him.
I am still hopeful that whoever the next coach is will play more to his strengths and hurry up the offense and let him throw down field more.
Great point. As much as I hate Weeden, a 1st round QB would be a waste. That doesn't mean we can't draft a QB in the 4th or 5th as a developmental project/competition.IggyPride00;1326042 wrote:
Without a 2nd round pick, there is no way the organization will burn another first round pick on a QB who at best would be a marginal upgrade over Weeden. Taking another QB would mean that we didn't address any of the gaping defensive holes (secondary) with an impact player in the 1st round.
like_that;1326187 wrote:What I want to know is what is going to happen to @fakepatshurmur when Pat Shurmur is fired. Is anyone else as concerned as I am?!?
lhslep134;1326134 wrote:Great point. As much as I hate Weeden, a 1st round QB would be a waste. That doesn't mean we can't draft a QB in the 4th or 5th as a developmental project/competition.
Probably not a bad idea. I have serious doubts that McCoy will be around much longer. Is he a free agent this coming offseason? I think he has one year left on his contract.lhslep134;1326134 wrote:Great point. As much as I hate Weeden, a 1st round QB would be a waste. That doesn't mean we can't draft a QB in the 4th or 5th as a developmental project/competition.