I just don't think there's value taking him at 4.lhslep134;1130384 wrote:I would be ecstatic. I still don't understand how there's a knock on Blackmon.
I know the saying about running backs being "a dime a dozen" but I'd rather take Richardson there in that I think he would have a greater immediate impact on the offense. I think there's a bigger gap/diffence in talent between Richardson and the #2 RB in this draft than there is between Blackmon and the #2 WR. For some, Blackmon may not EVEN be the top WR.
I'm starting to sour on the thought of Claiborne at 4, so I'm sure that will be the pick. :laugh: I'd rather see RT, WR & RB in no particular order.