Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ 2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 19, 2012 12:30 AM
Skyhook79;1120329 wrote:Something the Browns know nothing about since they have never done it. The last 14 years have been fatal, it's time to spend some money.
Jeff Garcia?
Mar 18, 2012 8:30pm
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Mar 19, 2012 12:47 AM
BR1986FB;1120346 wrote:Jeff Garcia?
He was injured for almost 1/2 the year and was there for only 1 season.
Mar 18, 2012 8:47pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Mar 19, 2012 12:52 AM
A great draft this year, puts us in good position for the playoffs. Book it. Like BR has said, we are signing our core guys to extensions. That's using the money you have in a smart, controlled way. They have a plan and are sticking to it. The only people it pisses off are the irrational, retarded fans(pick6) that think spending huge amounts of money on free agents will automatically mean success.
Mar 18, 2012 8:52pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 19, 2012 12:54 AM
DeyDurkie5;1120377 wrote:A great draft this year, puts us in good position for the playoffs. Book it.
Your expectations of a bunch of rookies coming in and making a "playoff run" type impact is very unrealistic.
Mar 18, 2012 8:54pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Mar 19, 2012 12:56 AM
BR1986FB;1120383 wrote:Your expectations of a bunch of rookies coming in and making a "playoff run" type impact is very unrealistic.
Just like it is unrealistic for a bunch of posters on this thread to think RG3 is instantly going to make the Redskins at least 3 games better.
Mar 18, 2012 8:56pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Mar 19, 2012 12:57 AM
BR1986FB;1120383 wrote:Your expectations of a bunch of rookies coming in and making a "playoff run" type impact is very unrealistic.
Not really. We've got veterans in place(thomas, jackson, mack, dawson, rubin, etc) that will help mentor them. Sheard, taylor, haden etc had no problem coming in and producing. This team just needs a few more holes filled to get to that point and that is shown by the close division games we had last year. It's really not that unrealistic to think with a great draft this year that we will be in the hunt. I mean fuck, over half of our games were one posession games heading into the 4th quarter.
Mar 18, 2012 8:57pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:01 AM
DeyDurkie5;1120392 wrote:Not really. We've got veterans in place(thomas, jackson, mack, dawson, rubin, etc) that will help mentor them. Sheard, taylor, haden etc had no problem coming in and producing. This team just needs a few more holes filled to get to that point and that is shown by the close division games we had last year. It's really not that unrealistic to think with a great draft this year that we will be in the hunt. I mean fuck, over half of our games were one posession games heading into the 4th quarter.
Still have that one GLARING "blemish" that these holes being filled won't overcome.
Mar 18, 2012 9:01pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:05 AM
BR1986FB;1120396 wrote:Still have that one GLARING "blemish" that these holes being filled won't overcome.
Colt Mccoy isn't playing every position on the field. He's a winner, and with a good team around him, will win games. In my opinion of course!
Mar 18, 2012 9:05pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:09 AM
If Dimitri Patterson and Chris Gocong are core players, then we're even more fucked than I thought.
Mar 18, 2012 9:09pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:09 AM
BR1986FB;1120383 wrote:Your expectations of a bunch of rookies coming in and making a "playoff run" type impact is very unrealistic.
Is it? It worked for the Bengals last year. We have a chance at 3 legitimate impact players if we don't botch the picks. The FO had a good draft last year and I trust their judgment to make magic with 4,22, 37.
Mar 18, 2012 9:09pm
IggyPride00's avatar

IggyPride00

Senior Member

6,482 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:10 AM
This team just needs a few more holes filled
We don't have a starting QB/RB/or #1 WR.

That is more than a few holes, considering those are essentially the most important positions on that side of the ball.
Mar 18, 2012 9:10pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:15 AM
DeyDurkie5;1120401 wrote:Colt Mccoy isn't playing every position on the field. He's a winner, and with a good team around him, will win games. In my opinion of course!
He WAS a winner but that's a debate for another day.

This team will have to score at LEAST 300 points throughout the course of the season (up from 218 last year) while giving up less than 300 (last year was 307) to even be "competitive." Now I could see the defense tightening up but no way do I see this stone aged offense improving THAT much.
Mar 18, 2012 9:15pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:17 AM
lhslep134;1120411 wrote:Is it? It worked for the Bengals last year. We have a chance at 3 legitimate impact players if we don't botch the picks. The FO had a good draft last year and I trust their judgment to make magic with 4,22, 37.
And it's just a "given", in your eyes, that these draft picks will be light speed above other draft picks and perform like seasoned pros...just like AJ Green, correct? :rolleyes:
Mar 18, 2012 9:17pm
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:18 AM
^^ we better hope so or we will be picking top three next year. with three picks in the top 40 of the draft this year, our offense of playmakers are going to get better with this draft. (hopefully) the only thing is can he progress with them or will he suck ass and cause us to do horrible.
Mar 18, 2012 9:18pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:18 AM
IggyPride00;1120414 wrote:We don't have a starting QB/RB/or #1 WR.

That is more than a few holes, considering those are essentially the most important positions on that side of the ball.
Agreed...not to mention the Browns offense is VERY easy to defend.
Mar 18, 2012 9:18pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:19 AM
shook_17;1120438 wrote:^^ we better hope so or we will be picking top three next year. with three picks in the top 40 of the draft this year, our offense of playmakers are going to get better with this draft. (hopefully) the only thing is can he progress with them or will he suck ass and cause us to do horrible.
They WILL be picking top 3 next year...
Mar 18, 2012 9:19pm
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:22 AM
BR1986FB;1120440 wrote:Agreed...not to mention the Browns offense is VERY easy to defend.
well yeah BR they put 8 in the box and stop the run, because we all know colt can't beat them through the air. quick question. how many 300 yard games has he had? 1? and that was when he had 50 completions against the titans last year?
Mar 18, 2012 9:22pm
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:23 AM
BR1986FB;1120442 wrote:They WILL be picking top 3 next year...
this wouldn't surprise me.
Mar 18, 2012 9:23pm
Tigerfan00's avatar

Tigerfan00

Senior Member

3,427 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:25 AM
2012: Bust for Barkley
Mar 18, 2012 9:25pm
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:28 AM
Tigerfan00;1120467 wrote:2013: Bust for Barkley

first off. fuck that. im tried of losing and being the laughing stock of the NFL.

secondly, i don't think we are going to have to bust for shit. we already have enough holes. get some playmakers this year get a year under their belt, and get our qb next year
Mar 18, 2012 9:28pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:29 AM
shook_17;1120475 wrote:first off. fuck that. im tried of losing and being the laughing stock of the NFL.

secondly, i don't think we are going to have to bust for shit. we already have enough holes. get some playmakers this year get a year under their belt, and get our qb next year
They won't have to "bust." Even trying they are still going to have a top 3 pick. :(
Mar 18, 2012 9:29pm
Tigerfan00's avatar

Tigerfan00

Senior Member

3,427 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:33 AM
Meant 2012, sorry about that
Mar 18, 2012 9:33pm
OQB's avatar

OQB

Senior Member

6,679 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:34 AM
BR1986FB;1120478 wrote:They won't have to "bust." Even trying they are still going to have a top 3 pick. :(
truth.
Mar 18, 2012 9:34pm
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Mar 19, 2012 1:38 AM
BR1986FB;1120478 wrote:They won't have to "bust." Even trying they are still going to have a top 3 pick. :(
For sure that's what im saying! But its always "next year" in cleveland. It never ends lol
Mar 18, 2012 9:38pm