Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems
Log In Create Account

Death penalty for or against

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Serious Business ▸ Death penalty for or against
T

Thinthickbigred

Senior Member

4,148 posts
Dec 30, 2011 10:28 PM
Save the jokes for the ones who want me dead or lets be honest . just see what we come up with
Dec 30, 2011 10:28pm
T

Thinthickbigred

Senior Member

4,148 posts
Dec 30, 2011 10:30 PM
Against it . too many people have been murdered on death row that were later found to be innocent .
Now we have people every year being freed because of old DNA some 30 and 40 years old .
Dec 30, 2011 10:30pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Dec 30, 2011 10:35 PM
For but it's not a deterrent unless they expedite the process. If a Death Row inmate gets to sit and appeal for 10 years, what's the sense?
Dec 30, 2011 10:35pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Dec 30, 2011 10:35 PM
pls be honest
Dec 30, 2011 10:35pm
BORIStheCrusher's avatar

BORIStheCrusher

drunk

1,893 posts
Dec 30, 2011 10:36 PM
If there is indisputable evidence they are guilty, I'm for it. Unfortunately some people don't deserve to live.
Dec 30, 2011 10:36pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Dec 30, 2011 10:39 PM
For Priests who molest little kids....YES.
Dec 30, 2011 10:39pm
GoPens's avatar

GoPens

Senior Member

2,339 posts
Dec 30, 2011 10:40 PM
For but only with indisputable proof like several eye-witnesses and DNA.
Dec 30, 2011 10:40pm
Curly J's avatar

Curly J

Self Pwner in Training.

7,282 posts
Dec 30, 2011 11:33 PM
Against it, wait For it, wait I lied...
Dec 30, 2011 11:33pm
Sykotyk's avatar

Sykotyk

Senior Member

1,155 posts
Dec 30, 2011 11:36 PM
Against it. It's the ultimate penalty. If you put someone in prison for life and figure out 5 years later they were really innocent, you can let them out. If you put someone to death and 5 years later figure out they're innocent, they're still fucking dead.
Dec 30, 2011 11:36pm
hasbeen's avatar

hasbeen

Excuse me, Flo?

6,504 posts
Dec 30, 2011 11:38 PM
How did I know this was a thin thick thread?
Dec 30, 2011 11:38pm
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Dec 30, 2011 11:40 PM
Thinthickbigred;1031902 wrote:Against it . too many people have been murdered on death row that were later found to be innocent .
Now we have people every year being freed because of old DNA some 30 and 40 years old .
who would be examples of people legally executed under the present era, post furman v georgia 1972 that were innocent?
Dec 30, 2011 11:40pm
THE4RINGZ's avatar

THE4RINGZ

R.I.P Thread Bomber

16,816 posts
Dec 30, 2011 11:55 PM
For it
Dec 30, 2011 11:55pm
OSH's avatar

OSH

Kosh B'Gosh

4,145 posts
Dec 31, 2011 12:03 AM
I really haven't decided yet.

I used to be for it. I am now not 100% for or against it. I know there are times that I believe people should be executed.

It's cheaper to incarcerate for life -- although it could really be cheaper to execute if things were done differently.
Dec 31, 2011 12:03am
T

Thinthickbigred

Senior Member

4,148 posts
Dec 31, 2011 6:34 AM
OSH;1032035 wrote:I really haven't decided yet.

I used to be for it. I am now not 100% for or against it. I know there are times that I believe people should be executed.

It's cheaper to incarcerate for life -- although it could really be cheaper to execute if things were done differently.
Yep some people do such things that everybody wants them stoned to death but putting an innocent man to death is horrible . Supermax or total isolation is probably worse than death for the worst criminals
Dec 31, 2011 6:34am
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Dec 31, 2011 7:27 AM
For it, especially for child killers & serial rapists.
Dec 31, 2011 7:27am
S

Sonofanump

Dec 31, 2011 8:35 AM
I am against it. Instead let the convicted know that he will be visited daily unsupervised by representatives of the victim. He will be put in a straight jacket, the representative of the victim will have access to a baseball bat and dull knives. Put a rope in his cell just long enough to reach the top of the cell and let him make his own decision.</SPAN>
Dec 31, 2011 8:35am
pmoney25's avatar

pmoney25

Senior Member

1,787 posts
Dec 31, 2011 8:41 AM
I almost think solitary confinement is a worse penalty. To me, being driven to insanity would be worsthan death.

As for the question, I dont think it is a detterant but some people deserve it.
Dec 31, 2011 8:41am
M

mella

Senior Member

647 posts
Dec 31, 2011 9:28 AM
vball10set;1032168 wrote:For it, especially for child killers & serial rapists.
+1

This.
Dec 31, 2011 9:28am
ManO'War's avatar

ManO'War

Senior Member

1,420 posts
Dec 31, 2011 10:40 AM
I don't think we use it enough.
Dec 31, 2011 10:40am
F

fan_from_texas

Senior Member

2,693 posts
Dec 31, 2011 10:57 AM
Tentatively for it. I don't have strong moral objections to it, though I don't think it's a very effective deterrent.
Dec 31, 2011 10:57am
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Dec 31, 2011 12:08 PM
Sonofanump;1032181 wrote:I am against it. Instead let the convicted know that he will be visited daily unsupervised by representatives of the victim. He will be put in a straight jacket, the representative of the victim will have access to a baseball bat and dull knives. Put a rope in his cell just long enough to reach the top of the cell and let him make his own decision.
Makes sense.:rolleyes:

I say let the States decide, this should not be a Federal issue. Depending on how the law is written I would be for it in certain instances.
Dec 31, 2011 12:08pm
iclfan2's avatar

iclfan2

Reppin' the 330/216/843

6,360 posts
Dec 31, 2011 12:18 PM
I'm for it. As others have said, if there is DNA matches to a child rapist, multiple eye witnesses/video proof, or other types of slam dunk evidence, I think there should be no more than one appeal process, and then death. I don't care about the "deterrent" aspect, but isn't it the absolute deterrent to the person committing the crime? They will never commit a crime again. My buddy works at a prison as a CO, and he said the people there are absolute garbage. They smile at him all day long, they don't care that they are there.
Dec 31, 2011 12:18pm
gerb131's avatar

gerb131

Senior Member

9,932 posts
Dec 31, 2011 12:20 PM
For it and put in an express line.
Dec 31, 2011 12:20pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Dec 31, 2011 12:32 PM
iclfan2;1032336 wrote:They will never commit a crime again. My buddy works at a prison as a CO, and he said the people there are absolute garbage. They smile at him all day long, they don't care that they are there.
Why should they? Three meals a day, a roof over there head, a bunk to sleep in, and all the ass you can get---it's a frickin' resort for most of these pieces of shit :mad:
Dec 31, 2011 12:32pm
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Dec 31, 2011 12:38 PM
Definitely for it. If you're guilty without a shadow of a doubt, you need to go immediately.
Dec 31, 2011 12:38pm