Holmgren gets more credit than he deserves. His personel moves were suspect at best in Seattle. He gave up a lot to get guys like Deion Branch and a few others while letting Steve Hutchinson walk after they came off a year where they pretty much won a superbowl. He is a great head coach, but his other decisions are iffy.Red Rider Nation;1019298 wrote:Holmgren is a big part of the problem! Shurmur is the worst coach in the NFL. Why do we continue to replace bad coaches with worse ones?
Wooball;1019301 wrote:Yes please fire the coach again, get rid of the front office, start over again!!!!
Some of you need to take a step back off that ledge and give this regime more than 2 drafts. They haven't even started to add players through free agency yet, don't appear to have a QB to go forward with. Do I love the play calling? No, but obviously Shurmur isn't overly excited about the idea of letting Colt McCoy or Seneca Wallace drop back and throw the ball down the field, can you really blame him?
His playcalling was suspect with St Louis as well. I don't like him at all...but they at least need to bring in an OC. He obviously is in over his head being the HC and the OC.Wooball;1019301 wrote:Yes please fire the coach again, get rid of the front office, start over again!!!!
Some of you need to take a step back off that ledge and give this regime more than 2 drafts. They haven't even started to add players through free agency yet, don't appear to have a QB to go forward with. Do I love the play calling? No, but obviously Shurmur isn't overly excited about the idea of letting Colt McCoy or Seneca Wallace drop back and throw the ball down the field, can you really blame him?
Like I said, haven't been a fan of his play calling. I would be in favor of bringing in an OC to call the plays. But I like what Jauron has done with the defense. I think they are another DE away from have a very good DL. I don't think it would be a good idea to get rid of the head coach after one season. I mean really, the front office didn't give these guys much of a chance this year. They added the guys through the draft, but didn't bring in anyone in free agency. It was pretty obvious they weren't going all in to win this year, but to find out what they had at some positions. Now if we are at this same point next year, then yes it would be time to make some changes.wes_mantooth;1019315 wrote:His playcalling was suspect with St Louis as well. I don't like him at all...but they at least need to bring in an OC. He obviously is in over his head being the HC and the OC.
Shurmur leaves an anemic offense in St. Louis and after the better part of one season, the offense in St. Louis hasn't changed one little bit. Meanwhile, the offense in Cleveland is hell-bent on running dink passes designed to protect fragile quarterbacks from standing in the pocket and throwing downfield.wes_mantooth;1019315 wrote:His playcalling was suspect with St Louis as well. I don't like him at all...but they at least need to bring in an OC. He obviously is in over his head being the HC and the OC.
I know he went out with Crennel but it's a shame that Chudzinski wasn't the caliber of an OC that he is now. We had a good year with him as OC but what he's done to the Panthers offense is nothing short of amazing. He's going to earn himself a head coaching gig in the next few years, if not next year.stlouiedipalma;1019464 wrote: 1. Bring in a dynamic OC who has a vision of how great teams attack the defense (you'll note I said "attack the defense", something Cleveland hasn't done since Kosar left).
You are confusing Shurmur's incompetence with a plan. He doesn't have one, what you saw out there was the continued confirmation of my claim that he is what we thought he was: in way over his head.BR1986FB;1019734 wrote:May have been mentioned but after what I saw yesterday, I firmly believe that Shurmur was playing for a draft pick so he could get "his guy" at QB.
Interesting scenario with the Colts win yesterday. If the Colts pull out a win against JAX and St Louis loses out they both finish 2-14. Who gets the first pick on strength of schedule? If the Rams pick #1 they will have a dilemma with Luck & Bradford. Could be advantageous to the Browns.
Couldn't get on here all weekend as my computer has a virus that my computer guy at work is now trying to fix.
I've seen the same bad play calling all season.BR1986FB;1019734 wrote:May have been mentioned but after what I saw yesterday, I firmly believe that Shurmur was playing for a draft pick so he could get "his guy" at QB.
Is your computer being Hacked?! Talk to gibby about that. Or perhaps it was a rogue script?BR1986FB;1019734 wrote:Couldn't get on here all weekend as my computer has a virus that my computer guy at work is now trying to fix.
This became pretty apparent last season. Moving the kickoff up was just the final nail in the coffin imo.BR1986FB;1019757 wrote:Also think that Josh Cribbs has become obsolete as a Brown.
I think Skrine can handle the kick return duties. Much more explosive. Cribbs is nothing more than a gunner on kick/punt coverage, imo. Brings nothing at the WR position and his best return days are gone.like_that;1019762 wrote:This became pretty apparent last season. Moving the kickoff up was just the final nail in the coffin imo.
So he goes from "just pay him the money" to "obsolete" in 1 year? Good thing they signed him to a 3yr 20 million dollar deal then.BR1986FB;1019757 wrote:Also think that Josh Cribbs has become obsolete as a Brown.
No he's not.Pick6;1019823 wrote:Cribbs is easily still the best weapon the Browns have.
Disagree, have you not watched him this season? He's lost 2 steps.Pick6;1019823 wrote:Cribbs is easily still the best weapon the Browns have.