merv
Posts: 174
Dec 6, 2011 10:02pm
Michigan (10-2) will play Virginia Tech (11-2) in the Allstate Sugar Bowl. Airing on ESPN, Jan.3rd at 8:30. Who you got winning?
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 6, 2011 10:20pm
Michigan by 10. No wait. Vtech by 17.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 6, 2011 10:38pm
Michigan by 30.
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Dec 6, 2011 10:47pm
Hopefully Tech wins by 30. But I'll take scUM by a couple of touchdowns.
0
0311sdp
Posts: 580
Dec 7, 2011 12:07am
If Denard throws the ball well that day, Michigan wins, if he throws like he does about half the time (2-3 int.) VT wins.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 7, 2011 7:57am
Va Tech wins on a special teams play, more than likely a blocked punt returned for 6
VT 28
tsun 24
VT 28
tsun 24
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Dec 7, 2011 8:15am
I think UM wins by at least 10. It will look like the Clemson VT games...
R
RRRock
Posts: 62
Dec 8, 2011 8:12am
I think if Michigan takes care of the ball they win, 31-20.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 8, 2011 11:25pm
VA Tech and the ACC are about one to two steps above the Big East, which puts them 10 steps behind every other BCS conference. Michigan wins.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 13, 2011 4:35pm
Apparently these are the jerseys Michigan will be wearing.
Little Danny
Posts: 4,288
Dec 13, 2011 4:41pm
I think Michigan wins by two scores or more
Virginia Tech is a fraud and did not deserve a BCS bid. They lost to Clemson by a combined margin of 48 points.
Virginia Tech is a fraud and did not deserve a BCS bid. They lost to Clemson by a combined margin of 48 points.
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Dec 13, 2011 7:09pm
Those jerseys are a billion times better than the ones worn at MSU, can't believe someone thought they looked good.
I bet the Sugar Bowl is really regretting not taking Baylor now. VT can't sell tickets, which is why they were picked and RGIII being a heisman winner would have been a huge marketing tool.
I bet the Sugar Bowl is really regretting not taking Baylor now. VT can't sell tickets, which is why they were picked and RGIII being a heisman winner would have been a huge marketing tool.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 13, 2011 7:22pm
Baylor vs. tsun? Now that would've been an exciting game, and a much better storyline...RGIII vs. Shoelace? wowdave;1013974 wrote:Those jerseys are a billion times better than the ones worn at MSU, can't believe someone thought they looked good.
I bet the Sugar Bowl is really regretting not taking Baylor now. VT can't sell tickets, which is why they were picked and RGIII being a heisman winner would have been a huge marketing tool.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 13, 2011 7:31pm
VT sucks and didnt deserve this bid. I hope UM wins by a lot.
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Dec 13, 2011 7:56pm
If denard is healthy this game should be ugly.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 13, 2011 8:00pm
I agree. Surprised they didn't go for that, even pre-Heisman.vball10set;1013982 wrote:Baylor vs. tsun? Now that would've been an exciting game, and a much better storyline...RGIII vs. Shoelace? wow
G
georgemc80
Posts: 983
Dec 14, 2011 9:40am
I would also enjoyed a Baylor UM game. UM wins this game, but it will be a nail biter.
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Dec 14, 2011 1:14pm
Yea, you don't even have to market it. It'd market itself.WebFire;1014040 wrote:I agree. Surprised they didn't go for that, even pre-Heisman.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 14, 2011 5:08pm
RGIII>Shoelace.......however, that'd be a helluva game.vball10set;1013982 wrote:Baylor vs. tsun? Now that would've been an exciting game, and a much better storyline...RGIII vs. Shoelace? wow
Va Tech is from the shitty ACC and will get blown out by Michigan.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 14, 2011 7:10pm
Thank you for stating the obvious to get your shot in.dwccrew;1014894 wrote:RGIII>Shoelace.......however, that'd be a helluva game.
Va Tech is from the shitty ACC and will get blown out by Michigan.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 14, 2011 8:44pm
How is that getting my shot in? I think Michigan could beat several BCS teams this season. I wish they would have been matched up with a better team than a joke team from a joke conference.WebFire;1014978 wrote:Thank you for stating the obvious to get your shot in.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 14, 2011 9:20pm
RGIII>DR was your shot.dwccrew;1015085 wrote:How is that getting my shot in? I think Michigan could beat several BCS teams this season. I wish they would have been matched up with a better team than a joke team from a joke conference.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 14, 2011 9:58pm
It's not true? I just thought it was a bad comparison on Vball's part. RGIII is WAY better than Denard. Yes it is obvious, but it wasn't to him apparently. Don't be so sensitive, you guys won.WebFire;1015169 wrote:RGIII>DR was your shot.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 14, 2011 10:03pm
He wasn't comparing. He was saying it would be a good marketing matchup, which it would. No one said DR was better, but you felt the need to say the obvious. A clear shot. Don't be so sensitive, you guys lost.dwccrew;1015257 wrote:It's not true? I just thought it was a bad comparison on Vball's part. RGIII is WAY better than Denard. Yes it is obvious, but it wasn't to him apparently. Don't be so sensitive, you guys won.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 15, 2011 11:37am
Webfire is nowhere near as sensitive as any Notre Dame fan.dwccrew;1015257 wrote:It's not true? I just thought it was a bad comparison on Vball's part. RGIII is WAY better than Denard. Yes it is obvious, but it wasn't to him apparently. Don't be so sensitive, you guys won.