As of right now, OSU is a subpar team, so we definitely need everyone. We have been decimated with injuries this season.ccrunner609;992276 wrote:We are going to play a subpar team so we should be ok
ccrunner609;992276 wrote:We are going to play a subpar team so we should be ok
I thought that Bowl's couldn't take a 6-6 team over a team w/ a winning record. So unless the Gator Bowl doesn't have a team with a winning record available to take, OSU won't be playing in a Bowl outside of one with a BIG commitment to fill.imex99;992332 wrote:Could be playing Florida...
Gator Bowl President
His name is Rick Catlett. He told me that he'd love to have an OSU-Florida matchup with all the story lines.
When asked if he was aware that there are rumors OSU may decline a bowl bid, he said he would have to hear that from either the Big Ten or OSU. Neither have contacted him and as far as he is concerned OSU is a bowl eligible team prepared to make a trip to the postseason.
Ari Wasserman Staff Writer - BSB
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
With his off field issues this past season, I don't think Berry will be at OSU.Ty Webb;992312 wrote:This team is going to be really fun to watch next year in this offense...
Was reading around on another board and heard Urban is planning on moving one of the tailbacks to WR and use him like Harvin? Would that be Jamaal Berry?
Does Bruce Drennan actually have any real sources? Also, if the team wasn't going to a Bowl game, why did Gene Smith make it a point to say Luke would be coaching in the Bowl game? And Meyer referenced the team going to win their Bowl to get momentum for the upcoming season.holdingout;992430 wrote:On STO yesterday, Bruce Drennan said a source told him during a team meeting, the seniors on football team voted against going to any bowl game.
This makes me really wish we had landed Akise Teague...Ty Webb;992312 wrote:This team is going to be really fun to watch next year in this offense...
Was reading around on another board and heard Urban is planning on moving one of the tailbacks to WR and use him like Harvin? Would that be Jamaal Berry?
This.vball10set;992516 wrote:It's not only missing the bowl game, but the 15 practices leading up to it, and I think Shazier would benefit from these even more than Stoney.
If Sweat is back, Shazier would not be a loss at all. If you have watched OSU since Sweat went out, they have not been very good. Shazier is going to be VERY good. He does make some great plays. But he isn't strong enough to consistantly get off of blocks and stuff the runner/hole as a LB should. Sweat was a pretty darn good player. Not sure many realized how good or what he did with this defense. He has been missed BIG TIME. I hope he is able to play in the bowl game.dat dude;992309 wrote:As much as I love Stoneburner, the offense doesn't use him correctly this year anyway. Shazier will be a big loss.
Supposedly, when Urban met Stoney, the first thing Urban said was "have you ever heard of Aaron Hernandez?"
I'll disagree. My post wasn't to compare the impact of Sweat vs. Shazier. I'll agree that Sweat was good during the season, but to say Shazier would not be a loss at all is just silly. Assuming Sweat is back and Shazier would be healthy, I wouldn't be surprised for OSU to try and get both on the field. Shazier has proven he is a playmaker when healthy. He also has a ton of potential for a true freshman.centralbucksfan;992663 wrote:If Sweat is back, Shazier would not be a loss at all. If you have watched OSU since Sweat went out, they have not been very good. Shazier is going to be VERY good. He does make some great plays. But he isn't strong enough to consistantly get off of blocks and stuff the runner/hole as a LB should. Sweat was a pretty darn good player. Not sure many realized how good or what he did with this defense. He has been missed BIG TIME. I hope he is able to play in the bowl game.
Fab1b;992715 wrote:Shazier got tore up against UM
