data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/410a9/410a978581792d9f8b313336ad9405fb930b44ab" alt="DeyDurkie5's avatar"
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 18, 2011 8:51am
tebow mania
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99118/99118a13114581859f0adb90676c2291f454c2ea" alt="gorocks99's avatar"
gorocks99
Posts: 10,760
Nov 18, 2011 9:00am
Stats for Denver:
Broncos first five games:
Offensive yards per game: 303.6 ypg
Time of possession: 26:45 average
Points for: 21 ppg
Yards allowed per game: 385.8 ypg
Turnovers forced: 1.4 per game
Points against: 28 ppg
Average offensive rank of opponents (current): 12.8
Average defensive rank of opponents (current): 16.8
Broncos last five games:
Offensive yards per game: 314.8 ypg
Time of possession: 31:35 average
Points for: 20 ppg
Yards allowed per game: 327 ypg
Turnovers forced: 1.2 per game
Points against: 21.4 ppg
Average offensive rank of opponents (current): 18.2
Average defensive rank of opponents (current): 16.6
Broncos first five games:
Offensive yards per game: 303.6 ypg
Time of possession: 26:45 average
Points for: 21 ppg
Yards allowed per game: 385.8 ypg
Turnovers forced: 1.4 per game
Points against: 28 ppg
Average offensive rank of opponents (current): 12.8
Average defensive rank of opponents (current): 16.8
Broncos last five games:
Offensive yards per game: 314.8 ypg
Time of possession: 31:35 average
Points for: 20 ppg
Yards allowed per game: 327 ypg
Turnovers forced: 1.2 per game
Points against: 21.4 ppg
Average offensive rank of opponents (current): 18.2
Average defensive rank of opponents (current): 16.6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d8f4/4d8f45de8beb69f342b5acaffc38b342a5e808a4" alt="Sykotyk's avatar"
Sykotyk
Posts: 1,155
Nov 18, 2011 9:33am
gorocks, but if you win, you win. Having Tebow has ignited their desire to play hard and not feel 'out of a game'.
Will it last, who knows. But, they're going to ride the wave.
Will it last, who knows. But, they're going to ride the wave.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a721/3a7210bc3cd307f8df53e8811c3a6832b4110f7e" alt="justincredible's avatar"
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Nov 18, 2011 9:42am
Are they, though?Skyhook79;977658 wrote:The Jets and the Raiders are good teams. They definitely are not "shitty teams" as you call them. If the Jets would have won you would have said , see Tebow can't beat a good team.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="Iliketurtles's avatar"
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Nov 18, 2011 9:48am
Those are some interesting stats really not much difference. I do agree that the defense for the Bronocos seems to be playing better but just looking at the stats the Bronocos are keeping the ball for 5 more minutes per game than before thus resulting in less time for there opponent and maybe why the defense is giving up 60 less yards a game and 7 less points per game.
Note: To all the Tebow haters I am not sticking up for him he still sucks at throwing the ball. But this offense seems to be working which I didn't think it would. Will be crazy if they can keep it up.
Note: To all the Tebow haters I am not sticking up for him he still sucks at throwing the ball. But this offense seems to be working which I didn't think it would. Will be crazy if they can keep it up.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e97/79e97f67f2e42e4eb5ba600a0136c83d75ee8c0a" alt="Commander of Awesome's avatar"
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Nov 18, 2011 9:48am
They aren't?justincredible;977801 wrote:Are they, though?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="Iliketurtles's avatar"
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Nov 18, 2011 9:50am
Didn't Non say they were on another right after/just before their win against Buffalo? I mean if Non says it then it must be true.Commander of Awesome;977808 wrote:They aren't?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 18, 2011 9:52am
Denver's schedule
at San Diego - loss
at Minnesota - maybe a loss, I think so just because the Vikes are at home
Chicago - loss
New England - loss
they'll at least go 1-3 in these four
then
at Buffalo
Kansas City
looking at 8-8 at best
fun night last night but I don't see them making the playoffs
at San Diego - loss
at Minnesota - maybe a loss, I think so just because the Vikes are at home
Chicago - loss
New England - loss
they'll at least go 1-3 in these four
then
at Buffalo
Kansas City
looking at 8-8 at best
fun night last night but I don't see them making the playoffs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 18, 2011 9:53am
Well you said Buffalo was for real and got whacked two games in a row.Iliketurtles;977809 wrote:Didn't Non say they were on another right after/just before their win against Buffalo? I mean if Non says it then it must be true.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 18, 2011 9:57am
Raiders schedule
at Minnesota
Chicago
1-1 here for 6-5
at Miami - W
at Green Bay - L
7-6
Detroit
at Kansas City
San Diego
tough call on those last three but they're looking at either 8-8 or 9-7 I'd say
at Minnesota
Chicago
1-1 here for 6-5
at Miami - W
at Green Bay - L
7-6
Detroit
at Kansas City
San Diego
tough call on those last three but they're looking at either 8-8 or 9-7 I'd say
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="Iliketurtles's avatar"
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Nov 18, 2011 10:02am
Yeah I did they sucked ass in the second half in the game against the Jets and the Cowboys well that was just a tough game for them because the Cowboys have found an idenity and are just playing amazing right now. The Bills will bounce back and win this week and beat the Jets next week. And if that doesn't happen then I'll quit defending them and admit I was wrong.Non;977812 wrote:Well you said Buffalo was for real and got whacked two games in a row.
Speedofsand
Posts: 5,529
Nov 18, 2011 10:06am
Revis eating crow. At least he can give credit when its due, not like the haters here. LOL
"I'm shocked. This is crazy. I'm just so shocked right now," Darrelle Revis told the New York Daily News. "Don't get me wrong. I'm not doubting Tim Tebow's skills. He's a great football player. We felt like we had him where we wanted him. Those legs he's got brought the Denver Broncos home. He did it. Tim Tebow did it."
4 days ago the Jets had a 3 game winning streak and chance to grab 1st place at home vs New England.
Now they are a shitty team because Tebow beat them.
"I'm shocked. This is crazy. I'm just so shocked right now," Darrelle Revis told the New York Daily News. "Don't get me wrong. I'm not doubting Tim Tebow's skills. He's a great football player. We felt like we had him where we wanted him. Those legs he's got brought the Denver Broncos home. He did it. Tim Tebow did it."
4 days ago the Jets had a 3 game winning streak and chance to grab 1st place at home vs New England.
Now they are a shitty team because Tebow beat them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/410a9/410a978581792d9f8b313336ad9405fb930b44ab" alt="DeyDurkie5's avatar"
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 18, 2011 10:09am
they are a shitty team, because tebow and the broncos are a horribly shitty team.Speedofsand;977823 wrote:Revis eating crow. At least he can give credit when its due, not like the haters here. LOL
"I'm shocked. This is crazy. I'm just so shocked right now," Darrelle Revis told the New York Daily News. "Don't get me wrong. I'm not doubting Tim Tebow's skills. He's a great football player. We felt like we had him where we wanted him. Those legs he's got brought the Denver Broncos home. He did it. Tim Tebow did it."
4 days ago the Jets had a 3 game winning streak and chance to grab 1st place at home vs New England.
Now they are a shitty team because Tebow beat them.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Nov 18, 2011 10:10am
^
No they are shitty team becuz Rex Ryan coaches them.
No they are shitty team becuz Rex Ryan coaches them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99118/99118a13114581859f0adb90676c2291f454c2ea" alt="gorocks99's avatar"
gorocks99
Posts: 10,760
Nov 18, 2011 10:10am
I'm not arguing that they shouldn't be winning, on the contrary, there are statistical reasons why they're winning now as opposed to earlier in the season. Two within the Broncos control that go hand-in-hand (increased time of possession, decreased yards and points allowed per game), and one related but outside of their control (poorer offenses faced).Sykotyk;977792 wrote:gorocks, but if you win, you win. Having Tebow has ignited their desire to play hard and not feel 'out of a game'.
Will it last, who knows. But, they're going to ride the wave.
FYI, in their remaining games, they play teams with an average (current) offense ranking of 14.3 and an average (current) defensive ranking of 23.5. Against teams ranked 14th or higher offensively in terms of yards per game average, the Broncos are 1-4 this year (Win against Oakland, losses to Oakland, San Diego, Green Bay, Detroit). We will see how the season plays out against upper-half offensive teams since they have 3 remaining on their schedule (New England, Buffalo, San Diego). It will test their mettle and we'll see where they end up.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a721/3a7210bc3cd307f8df53e8811c3a6832b4110f7e" alt="justincredible's avatar"
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Nov 18, 2011 10:16am
Yeah, that guy sucks. Four playoff road wins in his first two seasons. GTFO.Tiernan;977826 wrote:^
No they are shitty team becuz Rex Ryan coaches them.
Just because he's a loudmouth doesn't mean he's a bad coach.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 18, 2011 10:22am
Jets will regroup and finish strong.
They have a lot of time now to try and iron out some things.
Their backs were against the wall the past couple years so this is a postion they're familiar with.
They have a lot of time now to try and iron out some things.
Their backs were against the wall the past couple years so this is a postion they're familiar with.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aee0/3aee0daed7b5a104db3b405b175649feaad74936" alt="Raw Dawgin' it's avatar"
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Nov 18, 2011 10:26am
Jets won't make the playoffs.Non;977842 wrote:Jets will regroup and finish strong.
They have a lot of time now to try and iron out some things.
Their backs were against the wall the past couple years so this is a postion they're familiar with.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/410a9/410a978581792d9f8b313336ad9405fb930b44ab" alt="DeyDurkie5's avatar"
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 18, 2011 10:28am
You are literally almost always wrong on your little "predictions"Non;977842 wrote:Jets will regroup and finish strong.
They have a lot of time now to try and iron out some things.
Their backs were against the wall the past couple years so this is a postion they're familiar with.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 18, 2011 10:29am
They'll win 5 of their last 6 and finish 10-6.Raw Dawgin' it;977847 wrote:Jets won't make the playoffs.
Whether that gets them in, I'm not sure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb2dd/eb2ddb24099d7f8ff52452d5fdeb88ff25dfb9ee" alt="Automatik's avatar"
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 18, 2011 10:30am
lol you would know all about that.DeyDurkie5;977850 wrote:You are literally almost always wrong on your little "predictions"
I think they are missing the post season too. Rex Ryan is nothing special....average at best.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 18, 2011 10:32am
says the guy who foolishly bet $100 that the Steelers had no chance of making the playoffsDeyDurkie5;977850 wrote:You are literally almost always wrong on your little "predictions"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a721/3a7210bc3cd307f8df53e8811c3a6832b4110f7e" alt="justincredible's avatar"
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Nov 18, 2011 10:33am
Average would be a .500 record, right? Rex is 25-15 as a head coach in the regular season, 29-17 if you include playoffs.Automatik;977855 wrote:lol you would know all about that.
I think they are missing the post season too. Rex Ryan is nothing special....average at best.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="Iliketurtles's avatar"
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Nov 18, 2011 10:33am
Non I'll make a signature bet with you. I believe the Jets don't make the playoffs.
If the Jets don't make the playoffs then you have to keep a signature of my choosing until the first regular season game of next season. If they Jets do make the playoffs then you can pick a signature for the same duration.
Justin this bet is just for Non sorry
.
If the Jets don't make the playoffs then you have to keep a signature of my choosing until the first regular season game of next season. If they Jets do make the playoffs then you can pick a signature for the same duration.
Justin this bet is just for Non sorry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a721/3a7210bc3cd307f8df53e8811c3a6832b4110f7e" alt="justincredible's avatar"
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Nov 18, 2011 10:34am
I want nothing to do with a bet on the Jets right now. I already fucked up and bet the Pats wouldn't make the playoffs before last weeks game. Durrrrrrrrrrr.