REDRIDER555
Posts: 55
Oct 6, 2012 1:53pm
Some untimely penalties, but that late hit was questionable at best, that ball had to be inches from his hands. I am not saying that changes the game, but it could not have hurt .Red Rider;1288346 wrote:Really dumb penalties on D last night late in game. 4th and 4 and a DB jumps offside trying to blitz. Then we get a late hit and interference calls during the same drive. Without those plays Ashland doesn't score and we are within striking distance in the 4th Q.
The QB change in the 4th for just one series was bizarre.
T
Troll King
Posts: 317
Oct 6, 2012 4:57pm
unfortunately I don't think they do. I just don't understand why other teams have first year quarterbacks playing who look like they have been playing for three years and not ours. who has been playing for three years.Coach_08;1288394 wrote:^^^^Troll King does Orrville even have that QB on the team right now or in the school?
T
Troll King
Posts: 317
Oct 6, 2012 5:03pm
They should get rid of the spread and install a run oriented offense like the wing T Or option we have the personnel to do that . The question is are the coaches familiar with it or smart enough to install it .
RedRider1
Posts: 3,850
Oct 6, 2012 5:24pm
Troll King;1288544 wrote:They should get rid of the spread and install a run oriented offense like the wing T Or option we have the personnel to do that . The question is are the coaches familiar with it or smart enough to install it .
Easy to say "do it," a lot tougher to install it. Would need an entire offseason to do it.
I'd like to see us go back to the I..2 backs, 2 WR, and a TE. Can do plenty from an I under center.
T
Troll King
Posts: 317
Oct 6, 2012 6:47pm
that's what I meant I was saying for next year installing new offense I know there's no time this year.RedRider1;1288553 wrote:Easy to say "do it," a lot tougher to install it. Would need an entire offseason to do it.
I'd like to see us go back to the I..2 backs, 2 WR, and a TE. Can do plenty from an I under center.
R
Red Rider Nation
Posts: 1,085
Oct 6, 2012 7:34pm
Saw some of the football players at the Akron game today. Lichti, Summers, and a few other. Not sure why Im posting this juist saying I saw them. What else should we post?
RedRider1
Posts: 3,850
Oct 6, 2012 9:37pm
Was told Zook had 17 tackles last night, 4 for loss, a sack & a fumble recovery.
Usually don't see those kind of tackle numbers against pass-heavy teams like Ashland.
Usually don't see those kind of tackle numbers against pass-heavy teams like Ashland.
1_beast
Posts: 5,642
Oct 7, 2012 1:49am
figured you gave them adviceRed Rider Nation;1288620 wrote:Saw some of the football players at the Akron game today. Lichti, Summers, and a few other. Not sure why Im posting this juist saying I saw them. What else should we post?
R
Red Rider Nation
Posts: 1,085
Oct 7, 2012 8:01am
1_beast;1289211 wrote:figured you gave them advice
Oh I did beast. While there I taught them all how to copy and paste. Dont worry though I told them all that technology was invented in Apple Creek.
1_beast
Posts: 5,642
Oct 7, 2012 1:00pm
We do use generators to convert electricity.Red Rider Nation;1289223 wrote:Oh I did beast. While there I taught them all how to copy and paste. Dont worry though I told them all that technology was invented in Apple Creek.
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Oct 7, 2012 1:09pm
At this point, I think 3-7 with a win against Wooster is a realistic goal.
T
Troll King
Posts: 317
Oct 7, 2012 3:42pm
Realistic is a possible win against clear Fork and finish 2-8 , we are not beating wooster this year .BRF;1289363 wrote:At this point, I think 3-7 with a win against Wooster is a realistic goal.
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Oct 7, 2012 4:04pm
Wooster is not THAT good....you take Owens away and they have nobody.
J
jaco
Posts: 226
Oct 7, 2012 4:49pm
Umm...Preston? The guy who runs the 4.27?? Wooster's problem is their paper thin defense, not their offense. They have weapons there. Tomblin runs hard, Preston is scary fast. I mean fast, fast. Owens role is decreased lately. They'll score 25+ against Orrville. They have a ton of team speed.OQB;1289752 wrote:Wooster is not THAT good....you take Owens away and they have nobody.
The question is, how many do they surrender? If they can lose to Lexington, they can lose to Orrville. But you have to muster some kind of competent offense.
R
Red Rider Nation
Posts: 1,085
Oct 7, 2012 5:30pm
Well then like Troll said we are not beating Wooster this year. Their offense sounds decent and their defense is weak but we cant score on any defense so it wont matter. Wooster will win like 34-17. We might be Clearfork but that is a stretch they are better then we are. We will lose to Madison by 30+jaco;1289803 wrote:Umm...Preston? The guy who runs the 4.27?? Wooster's problem is their paper thin defense, not their offense. They have weapons there. Tomblin runs hard, Preston is scary fast. I mean fast, fast. Owens role is decreased lately. They'll score 25+ against Orrville. They have a ton of team speed.
The question is, how many do they surrender? If they can lose to Lexington, they can lose to Orrville. But you have to muster some kind of competent offense.
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Oct 7, 2012 6:26pm
I will have more to say during Wooster week.
For now, we concentrate on the matter at hand.
3-7 is very realistic, imo, of course.
For now, we concentrate on the matter at hand.
3-7 is very realistic, imo, of course.
R
Red Rider Nation
Posts: 1,085
Oct 7, 2012 7:18pm
BRF;1289866 wrote:I will have more to say during Wooster week.
For now, we concentrate on the matter at hand.
3-7 is very realistic, imo, of course.
So the difference between 3-7 and 2-8 or 1-9 is??? let me guess a game or two?
S
scarface1
Posts: 128
Oct 7, 2012 7:25pm
The problem with wooster is they turn the ball over too much. Every loss they have had at least three turnovers when they won the wadsworth game one turnover, clear fork only two turnovers but game was already in hand. And they cant stop a big running back to save thier lives, so if Orrville sticks to the run game they will have a chance to win that game.
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Oct 7, 2012 8:24pm
Yes, I would take 3-7 over 2-8 or 1-9.Red Rider Nation;1289893 wrote:So the difference between 3-7 and 2-8 or 1-9 is??? let me guess a game or two?
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Oct 7, 2012 9:37pm
jaco;1289803 wrote:Umm...Preston? The guy who runs the 4.27?? Wooster's problem is their paper thin defense, not their offense. They have weapons there. Tomblin runs hard, Preston is scary fast. I mean fast, fast. Owens role is decreased lately. They'll score 25+ against Orrville. They have a ton of team speed.
The question is, how many do they surrender? If they can lose to Lexington, they can lose to Orrville. But you have to muster some kind of competent offense.
Preston although he has great speed is a head case....he stops giving effort and starts feeling sorry for himself if things don't go his way.
I saw them play Ashland and their offense is just as predictable as ours....and like others have said their defense has plenty of issues.
Let's focus on this week!
G
gowoo
Posts: 62
Oct 7, 2012 9:44pm
The great thing about the Wooster-Orrville game or Orrville-Wooster, however you prefer to refer to the game is that nothing really matters until it comes down to that night. Whichever team comes in with an attitude and is ready to play football will win. Nothing that happened before or on paper makes much of a difference
T
Troll King
Posts: 317
Oct 7, 2012 11:54pm
problem is Orrville will not stick to the run, they will continue to pretend they can pass. Regardless of how well they are running the ball.scarface1;1289902 wrote:The problem with wooster is they turn the ball over too much. Every loss they have had at least three turnovers when they won the wadsworth game one turnover, clear fork only two turnovers but game was already in hand. And they cant stop a big running back to save thier lives, so if Orrville sticks to the run game they will have a chance to win that game.
T
Troll King
Posts: 317
Oct 8, 2012 12:01am
My prediction for the final three game scores are as follows. Madison 49 Orrville 7. Clearfork 21 Orrville 0. Wooster 42 Orrville 14. Just my feeling, hope I'm wrong.
rrfan
Posts: 1,922
Oct 8, 2012 7:42am
Look a lot of fighting about WR's and QB's but I would like to know why by this late in the season can the QB not get a snap close to where he is standing in the shot gun? Get it figured out!
T
Troll King
Posts: 317
Oct 8, 2012 9:45am
He's tired LOL.rrfan;1290160 wrote:Look a lot of fighting about WR's and QB's but I would like to know why by this late in the season can the QB not get a snap close to where he is standing in the shot gun? Get it figured out!