Tobias Fünke;966536 wrote:really..10x worse than molesting 20 boys. You are saying that 200 boys will have been molested?

Fab1b;966632 wrote:No Tress, OSU, ND, Auburn, Oregon, anything but the subject at hand!

Tobias Fünke;966650 wrote:So you people see no comparison between the lunacy that was the media and rumors about OSU and what happened on the first page of this thread? Really?

sportchampps;966666 wrote:They said he just recently had a boy with him last week. Tobias child molesters usually will molest as many victims as possible until they are caught. The face he has had so many opportunities over the years point to the number be extremely high. Molesters can not control themselves in private situations with children and Sandusky had 1000x of these chances.

DeyDurkie5;966670 wrote:dude, shut the fuck up.

BR1986FB;966682 wrote:I haven't been keeping up with these threads so it's probably been mentioned but there were a lot of famous donors to Sandusky's foundation such as Millen, Jack Ham, Franco Harris, Lou Holtz, Arnold Palmer, Mark Wahlberg, etc and, according to 92.3 (Cleveland), they were made aware of his "transgressions" yet still supported the program.

bigkahuna;966691 wrote:Could it be because they believed in the program as a whole? I mean it sounds good that in general, they are taking troubled youths and helping them through athletics.

Tobias Fünke;966679 wrote:I'll interpret that as "it's okay when we do it to other schools we don't particularly care for, but not when anyone says anything about us. THEY need to wait for facts to surface, not us."

Some of you need to get real.

Tobias Fünke;966729 wrote:Wasn't Sandusky proven not guilty or whatever, I mean the investigation from 1998 didn't go anywhere....and no one knew anything about the 2002 incident outside of McQueary and the Penn State admins (JoePa included).

I mean, if a highly respected guy (from literally 100% of his coaching buddies, no?) isn't even charged with a crime, I don't think you can honestly say you'd distance yourself. He wasn't even charged from the 1998 thing, right? It's one thing to be proven not guilty, but he wasn't even charged and to the outside I think that unfortunately looked fine. Terribly, terribly unfortunate I think.

Tobias Fünke;966729 wrote:Wasn't Sandusky proven not guilty or whatever, I mean the investigation from 1998 didn't go anywhere....and no one knew anything about the 2002 incident outside of McQueary and the Penn State admins (JoePa included).

I mean, if a highly respected guy (from literally 100% of his coaching buddies, no?) isn't even charged with a crime, I don't think you can honestly say you'd distance yourself. He wasn't even charged from the 1998 thing, right? It's one thing to be proven not guilty, but he wasn't even charged and to the outside I think that unfortunately looked fine. Terribly, terribly unfortunate I think.

Tobias Fünke;966536 wrote:Did I or did I not just see you and the crew allude that Penn State and specifically Joe Paterno had a member of the police murdered, that this will definitely get 10x worse (really..10x worse than molesting 20 boys. You are saying that 200 boys will have been molested?), and that he was essentially functioning as a pimp for yet-to-be-named big donors.

If Tressel's emails are equivalent to the grand jury testimonies....then the anonymous sources horse**** is equivalent to what is happening now.

Simply saying, wait for due process so you don't look like fools jumping to conclusions.

Where's S&L to tell me this isn't a courtroom?

Tobias Fünke;966729 wrote:Wasn't Sandusky proven not guilty or whatever, I mean the investigation from 1998 didn't go anywhere....and no one knew anything about the 2002 incident outside of McQueary and the Penn State admins (JoePa included).

I mean, if a highly respected guy (from literally 100% of his coaching buddies, no?) isn't even charged with a crime, I don't think you can honestly say you'd distance yourself. He wasn't even charged from the 1998 thing, right? It's one thing to be proven not guilty, but he wasn't even charged and to the outside I think that unfortunately looked fine. Terribly, terribly unfortunate I think.

dwccrew;966891 wrote:Where in the hell in any of my posts do you get me claiming that the story about JoePa being linked with the DA's disappearance is true? And where did you see me say anything about claiming any truth about the pimping of the boys? I commented that if it is true, it is horrible. I never made claim that it is true. But if you can find a post that I did say something along those lines, I'll buy you and iPad 2.

And also, did you really just say anonymous sources are the equivalent to what is happening now? SMH



I didn't think he was proven not guilty since it never really went to trial. A GJ, is not a trial.

+1 some of them are saying joe pa needs raped in prison. Come the **** on. Seriously? I support joe pa, he told a higher up, and Sandusky wasn't on the football staff at the time . Joe pa is just a scapegoat in all of this

Writerbuckeye;966994 wrote:Just because authorities don't have enough evidence to charge you doesn't mean you're innocent. Obviously, PSU (and Paterno) believed there was something to the allegations, because Sandusky was "retired" very soon after that. If he was innocent (Sandusky), he could have fought the "retirement" legally; he chose not to and we now know why.