Agreed. The whole thing is a joke. Call the divisions Lakes and Plains, and make the championship trophy standardized.jordo212000;964257 wrote:I was thinking about that earlier. The funny thing is, I remember alot of us saying it should have been named after Tress.
Easy solution. Get rid of all the names for the trophies. It was pretentious and stupid just like the Legends and Leaders nonsense. Just call it the "Big 10 Championship Trophy"
This may be the most I've ever agreed with you on anythingsleeper;964260 wrote:Agreed. The whole thing is a joke. Call the divisions Lakes and Plains, and make the championship trophy standardized.
agreed, with repsjordo212000;964257 wrote:Easy solution. Get rid of all the names for the trophies. It was pretentious and stupid just like the Legends and Leaders nonsense. Just call it the "Big 10 Championship Trophy"
Amos Alonzo Stagg’s name being attached to the Big Ten football championship trophy may have to be reevaluated if Joe Paterno is found to be “complicit” in the Jerry Sandusky scandal according to Stagg's great grandson.
The hardware for the first Big Ten championship game next month -- the Stagg-Paterno Championship Trophy – has yet to be presented. But Robert Stagg told CBSSports.com on Tuesday that he is concerned about the family’s association if “more disturbing evidence,” is found in the case that has captured national headlines.
Osbourne? Why not Hayes? One of the most successful B1G coaches ever.krambman;964411 wrote:I like how the trophies are named to honor legends of the conference, but it may be best for the conference to rename it. Stagg-Osborn maybe, even though Tom Osborn never coached in the B1G (although most of Paterno's success came before Penn State was in the B1G). The only bad thing about naming trophies after people is that you can't ever really change them even if someone more deserving comes along. What if some B1G running back breaks all of the national all-time records at some point in the future. Even though the trophy should bear his name, they aren't going to remove someone else's name to add his. It's nice for honoring past legends, but doesn't leave much room for future legends.
Probably the most successful coach in B1G history. Or Paul Brown as well.dwccrew;964835 wrote:Osbourne? Why not Hayes? One of the most successful B1G coaches ever.
Because the coach of the year trophy is already named for Hayes. Since Hayes and Schembechler won more conference championships than any other coaches in B1G history, you have to put both of their names together on the same trophy and it either has to be the COTY or championship trophy. You can't name both trophies after both of them and you can't really put Hayes on both either. That's why I suggested Osborne as a replacement. He stands for everything the B1G does, he was an incredibly successful coach, and is now a B1G athletic director.dwccrew;964835 wrote:Osbourne? Why not Hayes? One of the most successful B1G coaches ever.
krambman;964878 wrote:Because the coach of the year trophy is already named for Hayes. Since Hayes and Schembechler won more conference championships than any other coaches in B1G history, you have to put both of their names together on the same trophy and it either has to be the COTY or championship trophy. You can't name both trophies after both of them and you can't really put Hayes on both either. That's why I suggested Osborne as a replacement. He stands for everything the B1G does, he was an incredibly successful coach, and is now a B1G athletic director.
For Sleeper, Paul Brown only coached for three years in the Big Ten.
I think that Fielding Yost and Hayden Fry would also be good candidates to replace the Paterno name on the trophy.
STFU!Tiernan;965072 wrote:Absolutely it should be renamed. Yost the most deserving of those being mentioned.
Yeah I know he's a scUMer but the SOB won 6 Natl Titles, went 60-1-1 during one string and never lost to OSU. He actually probably deserves to be on it over Stagg too.FatHobbit;965153 wrote:STFU!
That is 3 more than Osborne coached in the Big Ten. I don't think either of their names should be on it, but Brown deserves it more than Osborne does.krambman;964878 wrote: For Sleeper, Paul Brown only coached for three years in the Big Ten.
I only suggested Osborne because they already named one of the trophies after a former Nebraska player (I'm not sure which one and I'm too lazy at the moment to look it up). When naming all of the trophies they wanted to make sure that the current 12 members of the conference were all represented, even if some of those who were represented never actually played in the conference. When Nebraska joined the B1G this year the conference inherited all of their history, not just what they do from this point forward, just as they inherited Penn State's history when they joined in 1993 and MSU's history when they joined in 1953.Al Bundy;965208 wrote:That is 3 more than Osborne coached in the Big Ten. I don't think either of their names should be on it, but Brown deserves it more than Osborne does.
I think it is a stretch to consider Nebraska history prior to this year as part of Big Ten history. I don't consider Nebraska's national titles in the 90's as a Big Ten team winning the national title.krambman;965270 wrote:I only suggested Osborne because they already named one of the trophies after a former Nebraska player (I'm not sure which one and I'm too lazy at the moment to look it up). When naming all of the trophies they wanted to make sure that the current 12 members of the conference were all represented, even if some of those who were represented never actually played in the conference. When Nebraska joined the B1G this year the conference inherited all of their history, not just what they do from this point forward, just as they inherited Penn State's history when they joined in 1993 and MSU's history when they joined in 1953.
You are correct that you wouldn't claim Nebraska's national title's pre-2011 as part of the national championships won by the Big Ten conference, but you would say that B1G member Nebraska claims five national titles.Al Bundy;965276 wrote:I think it is a stretch to consider Nebraska history prior to this year as part of Big Ten history. I don't consider Nebraska's national titles in the 90's as a Big Ten team winning the national title.
