BUT....You also said, "But you can't ignore the fact that 80 some percent of the predictions from that site come true--not scores but outcomes."SQ_Crazies wrote:FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH.skank wrote: Unfreakin believeable, Nobody wants to count Massillons 22 titles, because they "weren't played on the field", now were talkin freakin calpreps?
You also put stock into calpreps, anyway, how hard is it to predict 80% of high school football?SQ_Crazies wrote: Right. You don't have to buy into it--but you can't ignore that it predicts 80 some percent of games correct. That's pretty damn high--much more reliable than a lot of sources that people use for anything. Sorry that I stated a fact about the site and you can't handle it because it said Massillon would lose. I've never witnessed anyone completely lose their mind defending their school the way you have--it's insane. [size=xx-large]The fact that you have to go this far out of your way to do it tells me that everything everyone else says about the Tigers is much more reliable.[/size]
Didn't I make it clear that I don't put that much stock in it? Do you not understand the meaning of FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH? I was just posting it--you don't have to buy into it.skank wrote:You also put stock into calpreps, anyway, how hard is it to predict 80% of high school football?SQ_Crazies wrote: Right. You don't have to buy into it--but you can't ignore that it predicts 80 some percent of games correct. That's pretty damn high--much more reliable than a lot of sources that people use for anything. Sorry that I stated a fact about the site and you can't handle it because it said Massillon would lose. I've never witnessed anyone completely lose their mind defending their school the way you have--it's insane. [size=xx-large]The fact that you have to go this far out of your way to do it tells me that everything everyone else says about the Tigers is much more reliable.[/size]
Yeah, you made it clear, but you also went to the trouble of looking up the info.SQ_Crazies wrote:Didn't I make it clear that I don't put that much stock in it? Do you not understand the meaning of FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH? I was just posting it--you don't have to buy into it.skank wrote:You also put stock into calpreps, anyway, how hard is it to predict 80% of high school football?SQ_Crazies wrote: Right. You don't have to buy into it--but you can't ignore that it predicts 80 some percent of games correct. That's pretty damn high--much more reliable than a lot of sources that people use for anything. Sorry that I stated a fact about the site and you can't handle it because it said Massillon would lose. I've never witnessed anyone completely lose their mind defending their school the way you have--it's insane. [size=xx-large]The fact that you have to go this far out of your way to do it tells me that everything everyone else says about the Tigers is much more reliable.[/size]
And predicting high school football isn't that hard--especially when you're predicting Mooney vs. Massillon.
This was the second post on this thread, a Mooney supporter responding to MY post in which I didn't bring up the name Mooney.Rocket08 wrote: They also finished yet another decade without a State Championship
THIS....was the third post on this thread....I guess the only thing worse than a sore loser is an arrogant (fan base) winner.Rocket08 wrote:Alright, you proved that they can't beat good teams at home.skank wrote: Massillon finishes the decade with a home record of 56-15, Ok, not exactly domination, but let's look a little closer.
ALL 15 teams that won during this decade at PBTS were playoff teams.
Six of the teams made it to the championship game
(2003) Benedictine 14-1 state champs
(2003) St. Edward 11-4 state runner up
(2004) Benedictine 12-3 state champs
(2004) McKinley 11-4 state runner up
(2007) Mentor 11-3 state runner up
(2008) St. Ignatius 14-1 state runner up
Massillon finished the decade with a record of 4-1 vs rival McKinley.
Massillon played 4 home playoff games, finishing with a 3-1 record.
The avg. record of the 15 teams that won at PBTS is 10.2-2.7 and they have a .789 winning pct.
What's the records of the teams that they beat? That would be interesting
He had an opinion on Massillon football, THIS was my opinion of Mooney football.skank wrote: Ah, Mooney, did you ever wonder how a school with 250 boys can play so well against bigger school? Or how they can have an offensive line comparable to an NFL team, size wise, when every other school their size in the state has an O-line that averages like 220 lbs? Ah the advantages of being a private school.
Thank you chiefs, this is exactly it, you can't start a Massillon thread without some ying yang coming out of the woodwork and stirring shit.GoChiefs wrote: In skanks defense..I think he's just tired of them crapping on EVERY Massillon thread..it's not just this one by any means.
.jpg)
"you entered the thread a long time ago", this after saying, "like we don't hear enough Massillon crap anyways".SQ_Crazies wrote: Certainly not me. [size=xx-large]I entered the thread a long time ago[/size]--brought a piece of information in as a reference and you decided to try to call me out. You would have been all over calpreps nuts had it said that Massillon would beat Mooney.
How many Dover threads have I been on? Besides the one I started to counter the one that you started. YOU....are the one trolling Massillon threads, not me on Dover threads.september63 wrote: I reallly care less what ppl think or say about Dover football. Having said this, SKANK is always willing to dish it out, but when facts come out against anything Massillon. He turns into a crying bytch.
Trolling? This term seems to have gained an all time popularity here on freehuddle. Like I said, refer to me as a troll, doesnt effect me one bit! The point alot of ppl mention is you like to throw crap at ppl but get all defensive when they toss it back!!skank wrote:How many Dover threads have I been on? Besides the one I started to counter the one that you started. YOU....are the one trolling Massillon threads, not me on Dover threads.september63 wrote: I reallly care less what ppl think or say about Dover football. Having said this, SKANK is always willing to dish it out, but when facts come out against anything Massillon.
56-15 is a pretty good record nothing to sneeze at anyways.skank wrote: Massillon finishes the decade with a home record of 56-15, Ok, not exactly domination, but let's look a little closer.
ALL 15 teams that won during this decade at PBTS were playoff teams.
Six of the teams made it to the championship game
(2003) Benedictine 14-1 state champs
(2003) St. Edward 11-4 state runner up
(2004) Benedictine 12-3 state champs
(2004) McKinley 11-4 state runner up
(2007) Mentor 11-3 state runner up
(2008) St. Ignatius 14-1 state runner up
Massillon finished the decade with a record of 4-1 vs rival McKinley.
Massillon played 4 home playoff games, finishing with a 3-1 record.
The avg. record of the 15 teams that won at PBTS is 10.2-2.7 and they have a .789 winning pct.
september63 wrote:Trolling? This term seems to have gained an all time popularity here on freehuddle. Like I said, refer to me as a troll, doesnt effect me one bit! [size=xx-large]The point alot of ppl mention is you like to throw crap at ppl but get all defensive when they toss it back!![/size]skank wrote:How many Dover threads have I been on? Besides the one I started to counter the one that you started. YOU....are the one trolling Massillon threads, not me on Dover threads.september63 wrote: I reallly care less what ppl think or say about Dover football. Having said this, SKANK is always willing to dish it out, but when facts come out against anything Massillon.