Massillon at home

Home ▸ Archive ▸ High School Football ▸ Massillon at home
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Dec 10, 2009 8:18 PM
Massillon finishes the decade with a home record of 56-15, Ok, not exactly domination, but let's look a little closer.

ALL 15 teams that won during this decade at PBTS were playoff teams.

Six of the teams made it to the championship game
(2003) Benedictine 14-1 state champs
(2003) St. Edward 11-4 state runner up
(2004) Benedictine 12-3 state champs
(2004) McKinley 11-4 state runner up
(2007) Mentor 11-3 state runner up
(2008) St. Ignatius 14-1 state runner up

Massillon finished the decade with a record of 4-1 vs rival McKinley.

Massillon played 4 home playoff games, finishing with a 3-1 record.

The avg. record of the 15 teams that won at PBTS is 10.2-2.7 and they have a .789 winning pct.
Dec 10, 2009 8:18pm
R

Rocket08

Senior Member

645 posts
Dec 11, 2009 8:40 AM
They also finished yet another decade without a State Championship
Dec 11, 2009 8:40am
R

Rocket08

Senior Member

645 posts
Dec 11, 2009 8:49 AM
skank wrote: Massillon finishes the decade with a home record of 56-15, Ok, not exactly domination, but let's look a little closer.

ALL 15 teams that won during this decade at PBTS were playoff teams.

Six of the teams made it to the championship game
(2003) Benedictine 14-1 state champs
(2003) St. Edward 11-4 state runner up
(2004) Benedictine 12-3 state champs
(2004) McKinley 11-4 state runner up
(2007) Mentor 11-3 state runner up
(2008) St. Ignatius 14-1 state runner up

Massillon finished the decade with a record of 4-1 vs rival McKinley.

Massillon played 4 home playoff games, finishing with a 3-1 record.

The avg. record of the 15 teams that won at PBTS is 10.2-2.7 and they have a .789 winning pct.
Alright, you proved that they can't beat good teams at home.

What's the records of the teams that they beat? That would be interesting
Dec 11, 2009 8:49am
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Dec 11, 2009 4:43 PM
What team do you cheer for again rocket?
Dec 11, 2009 4:43pm
coyotes22's avatar

coyotes22

Go Tigers

11,298 posts
Dec 11, 2009 5:34 PM
Skank got his post edited by big gochiefs!!! LMAO

Atleast I am not the only one!!!! :D
Dec 11, 2009 5:34pm
Big Al Carter's avatar

Big Al Carter

Senior Member

431 posts
Dec 11, 2009 5:43 PM
He should get banned.
Dec 11, 2009 5:43pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Dec 11, 2009 6:01 PM
Thanks for editing chiefs, I must have accidently hit those six extra keys.
Dec 11, 2009 6:01pm
G

Gardens35

Senior Member

4,929 posts
Dec 11, 2009 6:10 PM
Ketchup or Mustard?
Dec 11, 2009 6:10pm
coyotes22's avatar

coyotes22

Go Tigers

11,298 posts
Dec 11, 2009 6:13 PM
Trojan
Dec 11, 2009 6:13pm
R

Rocket08

Senior Member

645 posts
Dec 12, 2009 12:29 PM
skank wrote: What team do you cheer for again rocket?
Here's a hint

[size=medium]7>22[/size]
Dec 12, 2009 12:29pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Dec 12, 2009 12:43 PM
Ah, Mooney, did you ever wonder how a school with 250 boys can play so well against bigger school? Or how they can have an offensive line comparable to an NFL team, size wise, when every other school their size in the state has an O-line that averages like 220 lbs? Ah the advantages of being a private school.
Dec 12, 2009 12:43pm
R

Rocket08

Senior Member

645 posts
Dec 13, 2009 2:14 PM
skank wrote: Ah, Mooney, did you ever wonder how a school with 250 boys can play so well against bigger school? Or how they can have an offensive line comparable to an NFL team, size wise, when every other school their size in the state has an O-line that averages like 220 lbs? Ah the advantages of being a private school.
No, but I have wondered how a public school can pull kids from all over the place, but have the gall to criticize a team who's record they would die for. And a team who has never been investigated for anything

Just me though

[size=medium]7>22[/size]
Dec 13, 2009 2:14pm
september63's avatar

september63

Senior Member

5,789 posts
Dec 13, 2009 2:38 PM
Rocket08 wrote:
skank wrote: Ah, Mooney, did you ever wonder how a school with 250 boys can play so well against bigger school? Or how they can have an offensive line comparable to an NFL team, size wise, when every other school their size in the state has an O-line that averages like 220 lbs? Ah the advantages of being a private school.
No, but I have wondered how a public school can pull kids from all over the place, but have the gall to criticize a team who's record they would die for. And a team who has never been investigated for anything

Just me though


Ive often wondered that myself!!

[size=medium]7>22[/size]
Dec 13, 2009 2:38pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Dec 13, 2009 8:04 PM
Rocket08 wrote:
skank wrote: Ah, Mooney, did you ever wonder how a school with 250 boys can play so well against bigger school? Or how they can have an offensive line comparable to an NFL team, size wise, when every other school their size in the state has an O-line that averages like 220 lbs? Ah the advantages of being a private school.
No, but I have wondered how a public school can pull kids from all over the place, but have the gall to criticize a team who's record they would die for. And a team who has never been investigated for anything

Just me though

[size=medium]7>22[/size]
That's funny, I have wondered why the privates enjoy such perks.

Amd Sept....you had better just concern yourself with beating Cambridge er, Mayberry, er, Hooterville. You have had your try at the big boy level, and you have failed miserably. As a matter of fact, when you had the chance to teach your kids a lesson and go into the offseason and work hard and see if that hard work paid off the next season, you balked at the opportunity, so, I guess we'll just wait until the next time D-over has their team of a lifetime to answer the phone call from your AD.
Dec 13, 2009 8:04pm
A

Al Bundy

Senior Member

4,180 posts
Dec 13, 2009 11:14 PM
[/quote]

You have had your try at the big boy level, and you have failed miserably. [/quote]

Mooney has more big school titles that Massillon.

1 > 0
Dec 13, 2009 11:14pm
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
Dec 14, 2009 12:37 AM
calpreps has Mooney 34, Massillon 14 FWIW.
Dec 14, 2009 12:37am
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Dec 14, 2009 5:46 AM
LMAO..Calpreps? Really? Lord knows THAT site is never wrong.
Dec 14, 2009 5:46am
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
Dec 14, 2009 8:55 AM
I don't like it, people put too much faith in it. Just posting it--they have to play the games on the field but it is incredible accurate for a computer.
Dec 14, 2009 8:55am
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Dec 14, 2009 1:54 PM
Yeah..I put absolutely zero faith into a computer.
Dec 14, 2009 1:54pm
september63's avatar

september63

Senior Member

5,789 posts
Dec 14, 2009 3:59 PM
Rocket08 wrote: They also finished yet another decade without a State Championship
Dec 14, 2009 3:59pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Dec 14, 2009 4:04 PM
Al Bundy wrote:
You have had your try at the big boy level, and you have failed miserably. [/quote]

Mooney has more big school titles that Massillon.

1 > 0
[/quote]

Well, if you were paying attention, you would see that I was talking about Dover having their shot at the big boy level.

1<22 Sorry
Dec 14, 2009 4:04pm
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
Dec 14, 2009 4:06 PM
GoChiefs wrote: Yeah..I put absolutely zero faith into a computer.
That's fine--the score is pretty irrelevant. I said for what it's worth--if it's worth nothing to you then ignore it. But you can't ignore the fact that 80 some percent of the predictions from that site come true--not scores but outcomes. Of course anything can happen on the field, but it is pretty accurate.
Dec 14, 2009 4:06pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Dec 14, 2009 4:19 PM
Unfreakin believeable, Nobody wants to count Massillons 22 titles, because they "weren't played on the field", now were talkin freakin calpreps?
Dec 14, 2009 4:19pm
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Dec 14, 2009 4:21 PM
Yeah..I know what you said SQ..was just putting my 2 cents in on what I thought of Calpreps and how everyone tries to use that to predict outcomes. Yes..80% might be true..but that means 20% are wrong. I wish Calpreps was right..b/c my Chiefs would have been at least Regional Champs. Lol and calm down skank..he said he didn't put any faith into it..he was just posting it.
Dec 14, 2009 4:21pm
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
Dec 14, 2009 4:36 PM
skank wrote: Unfreakin believeable, Nobody wants to count Massillons 22 titles, because they "weren't played on the field", now were talkin freakin calpreps?
FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH.
Dec 14, 2009 4:36pm