Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Oct 19, 2011 4:00pm
It came off as if you were making a slight remark about OSU. Apologies if not.cats gone wild;938867 wrote:Wasnt saying anything towards OSU was I? Just saying Miles disciplines real well unlike most schools.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Oct 19, 2011 4:03pm
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5950873Scarlet_Buckeye;938856 wrote:OSU suspended their players for 5 games. Not the NCAA. #GetOffYourHighHorse.
Pryor and four teammates were suspended Thursday by the NCAA for the first five games of next season for selling championship rings, jerseys and awards.
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Oct 19, 2011 4:04pm
karen lotz;938866 wrote:Are you sure about that?
No?According to the release provided by Ohio State, the university declared the student-athletes ineligible on Monday and requested reinstatement from the NCAA. [LEFT]
Read more: http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/feed/2010-12/osu-suspensions/story/reports-osu-investigating-tattoo-allegations#ixzz1bGB4xCop
[/LEFT]
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Oct 19, 2011 4:05pm
The school ruled them ineligible. They did not suspend them.
There's a difference.
There's a difference.
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Oct 19, 2011 4:07pm
Okay... Perhaps I have some terminology wrong, but I believe the school ruled them ineligible first, and then the NCAA suspended them. Correct?wildcats20;938875 wrote:The school ruled them ineligible. They did not suspend them.
There's a difference.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 19, 2011 4:09pm
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Oct 19, 2011 4:12pm
OSU ruled them ineligible first, I believe.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 19, 2011 4:16pm
Yes, then applied for reinstatement. NCAA handed down punishment. Ruling them ineligible doesn't mean suspending them for 5 games.Scarlet_Buckeye;938883 wrote:OSU ruled them ineligible first, I believe.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Oct 19, 2011 4:21pm
lotz coming into the discussion when osu gets brought up, shocking
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Oct 19, 2011 4:22pm
I'll grant that it doesn't mean suspension (so I used the wrong term), but the fact that they deemed the players ineligible is practically the same thing. It's might not have been totally proactive, but it certainly was more proactive than reactive.karen lotz;938886 wrote:Yes, then applied for reinstatement. NCAA handed down punishment. Ruling them ineligible doesn't mean suspending them for 5 games.
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Oct 19, 2011 4:26pm
OSU suspended Clarke one game for a MM disorderly conduct.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 19, 2011 4:31pm
DeyDurkie5;938890 wrote:lotz coming into the discussion when osu gets brought up, shocking
Its cute that you follow me around and not post anything of any substance. Unfortunately, I'm simply not interested in dating you, bro.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 19, 2011 4:57pm
It's not proactive nor is it anywhere near the same as a suspension, it's procedure and nothing more. Ruling them ineligible and then applying for reinstatement is nothing more than asking the NCAA to hand down whatever punishment they want.Scarlet_Buckeye;938891 wrote:I'll grant that it doesn't mean suspension (so I used the wrong term), but the fact that they deemed the players ineligible is practically the same thing. It's might not have been totally proactive, but it certainly was more proactive than reactive.
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Oct 19, 2011 5:03pm
I think it comes down to this:
What group of 100 popular, enabled, 18-22 year olds in any aspect of life doesn't have some fraction breaking the rules/laws?
Rule breaking will always be an inherent part of college sports. I know I did a ton of illegal things in college, but I had way less to lose.
What group of 100 popular, enabled, 18-22 year olds in any aspect of life doesn't have some fraction breaking the rules/laws?
Rule breaking will always be an inherent part of college sports. I know I did a ton of illegal things in college, but I had way less to lose.
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
Oct 19, 2011 5:31pm
Reps.wkfan;938806 wrote:So, lets see.....
Doing something illegal, against the law - suspended 1 or 2 games.
Doing something legal (selling your own stuff) - suspended 5 games.
Sure, makes sense.
1 or 2 games is what the OSU "bad boys" should have got for their pocket change violations. Instead Posey is sitting TEN games and Pryor was run out of school.
One or two games for flunking a drug test is barely a slap on the wrist, and considering it could not be ignored ( the coach had to do something) is no cause for "applauding" Miles on disciplining his players. Miles is only one step better than Brian Kelley at ND for suspending Michael Floyd for the "off season" for his 3rd DUI arrest. (then reinstates him in time for the season.). Yessir, we have some great disciplinarians in the college coaching ranks.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Oct 19, 2011 5:36pm
So you would agree that Auburn handled the Cam Newton situation proactively and appropriately by ruling him ineligible then immediately seeking reinstatement by the NCAA?Scarlet_Buckeye;938891 wrote:I'll grant that it doesn't mean suspension (so I used the wrong term), but the fact that they deemed the players ineligible is practically the same thing. It's might not have been totally proactive, but it certainly was more proactive than reactive.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Oct 19, 2011 5:37pm
Only in the SEC..
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Oct 19, 2011 5:38pm
lotz was nowhere near here after the shelacking OSU gave ND in the Fiesta bowl a couple years ago, shockingDeyDurkie5;938890 wrote:lotz coming into the discussion when osu gets brought up, shocking
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 19, 2011 5:46pm
sleeper;938969 wrote:lotz was nowhere near here after the shelacking OSU gave ND in the Fiesta bowl a couple years ago, shocking
You may be literally too stupid to insult. When was that fiesta bowl?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 19, 2011 5:48pm
HitsRus;938958 wrote:Reps.
1 or 2 games is what the OSU "bad boys" should have got for their pocket change violations. Instead Posey is sitting TEN games and Pryor was run out of school.
One or two games for flunking a drug test is barely a slap on the wrist, and considering it could not be ignored ( the coach had to do something) is no cause for "applauding" Miles on disciplining his players. Miles is only one step better than Brian Kelley at ND for suspending Michael Floyd for the "off season" for his 3rd DUI arrest. (then reinstates him in time for the season.). Yessir, we have some great disciplinarians in the college coaching ranks.
LOL
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Oct 19, 2011 5:53pm
Yes, and they've done a good job of weeding out the guys who levy zero punishment, lie about it, and then lobby for special treatment (play in the bowl game despite the suspension).HitsRus;938958 wrote:Reps.
1 or 2 games is what the OSU "bad boys" should have got for their pocket change violations. Instead Posey is sitting TEN games and Pryor was run out of school.
One or two games for flunking a drug test is barely a slap on the wrist, and considering it could not be ignored ( the coach had to do something) is no cause for "applauding" Miles on disciplining his players. Miles is only one step better than Brian Kelley at ND for suspending Michael Floyd for the "off season" for his 3rd DUI arrest. (then reinstates him in time for the season.). Yessir, we have some great disciplinarians in the college coaching ranks.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Oct 19, 2011 6:00pm
Their urine is not though.DeyDurkie5;938805 wrote:LSU is clean.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Oct 19, 2011 6:20pm
Repsdwccrew;939004 wrote:Their urine is not though.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 19, 2011 6:45pm
thugs :rolleyes:
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Oct 19, 2011 7:54pm
Yeah. Auburn did what they needed to do. They ruled their player ineligible (which he should have been), and for some godforsaken reason, the NCAA REINSTATED HIM! #Unbelievable!enigmaax;938965 wrote:So you would agree that Auburn handled the Cam Newton situation proactively and appropriately by ruling him ineligible then immediately seeking reinstatement by the NCAA?