killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 11, 2011 11:22am
I hope he just keeps Rees as the starter. Far from perfect but at least he made some good plays as well whereas I can't remember too many, maybe any, good plays made by Crist last week in the half that he played.
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Sep 11, 2011 11:27am
I hope Rees stays at the starting position.
But I wouldn't mind seeing Golson or Hendrix in there a times to keep the defense on their toes.
But I wouldn't mind seeing Golson or Hendrix in there a times to keep the defense on their toes.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Sep 11, 2011 11:28am
I am an OSU ALUM and I took my wife (UM alum) to this game as part of her anniversary gift. I have been to 4 years of OSU games as a student including 2002 OSU UM and the 2005 Texas game. Last nights game was the loudest, most electric environment I have ever seen at a college football game.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 11, 2011 11:57am
sherm03;891502 wrote:I hope Rees stays at the starting position.
But I wouldn't mind seeing Golson or Hendrix in there a times to keep the defense on their toes.
The problem is Kelly can't play either of the two young guys when the game is going as the first two have. Could have happened last night if they had stretched the lead like they should have.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Sep 11, 2011 12:08pm
Agree and disagree. I agree about the 1st down offense. I almost lost my voice everyksig489;891466 wrote:Michigan coaching was AWFUL last night. Denard could have run the zone read EVERY snap but they chose o only run it 5-6 times. Too much first down passing. DBs playing too far off corners. NO SAFETIES on NDs go ahead touchdown. Its a good thing Denard Robinson and his WRS came to play or the UM coaches would have coached that game away.
time they ran play action pass.
I didn't think the DBs played too far off very often. But then again, I'm used to RRod playing DBs 15 yards off every freaking play.
There was supposed to be a safety on that play, but he was in outer space. They dropped 8 into coverage and still let someone behind them. That was on the players.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Sep 11, 2011 12:08pm
Hell of a game
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Sep 11, 2011 12:39pm
Toledo would beat Michigan......again.Hb31187;891379 wrote:Guess we better beat up on Toledo to make sure if we're good or not
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Sep 11, 2011 12:41pm
Maybe, but Notre Dame might be OSU.dwccrew;891554 wrote:Toledo would beat Michigan......again.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Sep 11, 2011 12:47pm
Doubt it, especially with all the suspended starters back. Notre Dame couldn't even beat Michigan. Plus, Notre Dame hasn't beaten OSU in nearly 70 years.WebFire;891559 wrote:Maybe, but Notre Dame might be OSU.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 11, 2011 1:16pm
dwccrew = sleeper?
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Sep 11, 2011 1:21pm
Not even close. I am just not impressed with Notre Dame this season. I thought they'd win yesterday and actually thought they'd be decent this season, but after watching two pitiful games in which they were the better team but still managed to screw the pooch, I don't think they have what it takes yet.karen lotz;891620 wrote:dwccrew = sleeper?
Not sure how thinking ND couldn't beat OSU puts me on Sleeper's level. It's not like I pointed out how they have been irrelevent for 20 years. Then you could maybe make the assumption that I was Sleeper.
merv
Posts: 174
Sep 11, 2011 2:37pm
sherm03;891502 wrote:I hope Rees stays at the starting position.
But I wouldn't mind seeing Golson or Hendrix in there a times to keep the defense on their toes.
I hope Rees is the starter. He's fun to watch. Seems to get it, more than Crist. Rees is a gamer.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 2:50pm
Rightttt.dwccrew;891554 wrote:Toledo would beat Michigan......again.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 2:52pm
ND is better than Toledo. Toledo outgained OSU and took em to the wire. How is it out of the question for OSU to lose to ND? The last 70 years have nothing to do with this team OSU has right now. An Unproven QB, decent Wr's, good TE and a suspect line. Its not like OSU is the juggernaut they have been in years past.dwccrew;891570 wrote:Doubt it, especially with all the suspended starters back. Notre Dame couldn't even beat Michigan. Plus, Notre Dame hasn't beaten OSU in nearly 70 years.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 11, 2011 3:50pm
dwccrew used to be cool IMO but this 70 years stuff is just reckless venom. Whatever. Pile on if you like.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 11, 2011 3:50pm
This.Hb31187;891905 wrote:ND is better than Toledo. Toledo outgained OSU and took em to the wire. How is it out of the question for OSU to lose to ND? The last 70 years have nothing to do with this team OSU has right now. An Unproven QB, decent Wr's, good TE and a suspect line. Its not like OSU is the juggernaut they have been in years past.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 4:09pm
Do you read what you post?
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 4:11pm
And this year, ND would have a very good chance at beating OSU.
S
sjmvsfscs08
Posts: 2,963
Sep 11, 2011 4:15pm
I don't think Notre Dame could win against Ohio State if they turned the ball over as frequently as they have. But then again with Bauserman at the helm I'd bet on the Irish for the hell of it.
But why the hell are we having this discussion?
But why the hell are we having this discussion?
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 4:16pm
Go back a page, and read
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Sep 11, 2011 4:51pm
That was my point to dwccrew. Toledo COULD beat Michigan. And Notre Dame COULD beat OSU. I'm not really sure either is out of the question. But what does any of that prove?sjmvsfscs08;892165 wrote:I don't think Notre Dame could win against Ohio State if they turned the ball over as frequently as they have. But then again with Bauserman at the helm I'd bet on the Irish for the hell of it.
But why the hell are we having this discussion?
And I don't have a clue what we are having this discussion.
Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Sep 11, 2011 7:08pm
Props to Junior Hemmingway.
Dude came to Ann Arbor as a highly rated WR, and he's been nothing but injured his whole career. It's awesome that he's been able to bounce back, and Denard certainly trusts him.
Dude came to Ann Arbor as a highly rated WR, and he's been nothing but injured his whole career. It's awesome that he's been able to bounce back, and Denard certainly trusts him.
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Sep 11, 2011 10:29pm
Game is on ESPNU right now for anyone wanting to watch it again. 14-7 Notre Dame with 4:45 to play in the 2nd.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Sep 12, 2011 2:09am
Hb31187;892138 wrote:And this year, ND would have a very good chance at beating OSU.
WebFire;892241 wrote:That was my point to dwccrew. Toledo COULD beat Michigan. And Notre Dame COULD beat OSU. I'm not really sure either is out of the question. But what does any of that prove?
And I don't have a clue what we are having this discussion.
If any year ND could beat OSU, it would be this year seeing as it is one of the most down years in the last decade for OSU. I didn't say it was out of the question, I just doubt it. Especially once OSU has all of the suspended players back. It's funny to see people take things so out of context (not you Web, specifically).
Tobias Fünke
Posts: 2,387
Sep 12, 2011 2:25am
Players back or not I still don't think I could confidently say Ohio State would win that game.