Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Sep 2, 2011 12:41pm
And why would the guy who administered the test lie to protect Pryor?? LMAO, keep reachingScarlet_Buckeye;880408 wrote:The guy who gave him the test said he scored "significantly higher" than a 7. The same guy then said Pryor scored "significantly higher" the 2nd time around than the 1st.
If Pryor only scored a 22 on the 2nd time around, then what would he have "significantly improved" from?
It looks to me like the guy who administered the test is trying to protect Pryor.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 2, 2011 12:54pm
That quote doesn't necessarily say he didn't score a 7 on the first test. He said himself they go with the higher score when reporting to teams. Unless someone shows a copy of the test with Pryor's fingerprints on it, we aren't going to know what it was exactly.LJ;880414 wrote:There ya go
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 2, 2011 4:16pm
But, it does say thatkaren lotz;880433 wrote:That quote doesn't necessarily say he didn't score a 7 on the first test. He said himself they go with the higher score when reporting to teams. Unless someone shows a copy of the test with Pryor's fingerprints on it, we aren't going to know what it was exactly.
The report of a seven test score is erroneous,
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Sep 2, 2011 4:17pm
ccrunner609;880675 wrote:Glad to see he beat Can Newtons 21
Did Cam take it twice?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 2, 2011 4:25pm
No, they report the highest test score to teams. No one is saying that his test score that was sent to scouts was a 7. Hell, I'm not even saying that he scored a 7 the first time he took it, I have no clue what he scored...just like the rest of us.LJ;880678 wrote:But, it does say that
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 2, 2011 4:27pm
ts1227;880682 wrote:Did Cam take it twice?
Not sure but to be safe, we better have a "Player A vs Player B" wonderlic thread. If only we knew someone who does a good job starting those threads...
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Sep 2, 2011 4:55pm
One can easily infer that "significantly higher" refers to his second score, which he goes on to say "we always go with the higher score;" while Pryor could have still "scored" a 7 on his first test.LJ;880414 wrote:There ya go
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Sep 3, 2011 4:28pm
This.karen lotz;880433 wrote:That quote doesn't necessarily say he didn't score a 7 on the first test. He said himself they go with the higher score when reporting to teams.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 3, 2011 4:30pm
That quote says exactly that he didn't score a 7 on the first test. Can you not read? Either of you?Scarlet_Buckeye;881937 wrote:This.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 3, 2011 4:30pm
SMHScarlet_Buckeye;880752 wrote:One can easily infer that "significantly higher" refers to his second score, which he goes on to say "we always go with the higher score;" while Pryor could have still "scored" a 7 on his first test.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Sep 3, 2011 4:32pm
LJ;881945 wrote:That quote says exactly that he didn't score a 7 on the first test. Can you not read? Either of you?
He was VERY vague. He said the first one in essence does not count, thus when he was talking about the "not a 7" score it can very easily be taken that he only meant the second one.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 3, 2011 4:33pm
Let me translate that for those who can't seem to understand what it says.The report of a seven test score is erroneous," Colbert said. "I administered both tests
"I gave him the test 2 times, the report that he scored a 7 on one is false, I gave both tests"
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 3, 2011 4:34pm
Why would he admit that he took it twice, then says that the report he scored a 7 is incorrect?ts1227;881951 wrote:He was VERY vague. He said the first one in essence does not count, thus when he was talking about the "not a 7" score it can very easily be taken that he only meant the second one.
That makes no sense.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Sep 5, 2011 12:36am
Or maybe, the fact that he consistently refers to one score and not two means he is completely disregarding the irrelevant (from his perspective) lower score?LJ;881954 wrote:Let me translate that for those who can't seem to understand what it says.
"I gave him the test 2 times, the report that he scored a 7 on one is false, I gave both tests"
There is only one score that matters to this guy so he can't talk his terms and not lie about the first score because it means nothing."The report of a seven test score is erroneous," Colbert said. "I administered both tests and I can tell you that his score was significantly higher than that. I informed all teams and scouts interested in him about the score. In scouting, we always go with the higher Wonderlic score."
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Sep 5, 2011 1:27am
From reading Colbert's quotes, it completely sounds like Pryor took the test 2 times and did not score a 7 on either test.
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Sep 6, 2011 9:04am
This.ts1227;881951 wrote:He was VERY vague. He said the first one in essence does not count, thus when he was talking about the "not a 7" score it can very easily be taken that he only meant the second one.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 6, 2011 9:08am
This. If he got a 7 and it didn't matter, he wouldn't have said that he didn't get a 7, he would have merely said that the score reported was "significantly higher".SportsAndLady;883563 wrote:From reading Colbert's quotes, it completely sounds like Pryor took the test 2 times and did not score a 7 on either test.
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Sep 6, 2011 9:17am
This.enigmaax;883533 wrote:Or maybe, the fact that he consistently refers to one score and not two means he is completely disregarding the irrelevant (from his perspective) lower score?
There is only one score that matters to this guy so he can't talk his terms and not lie about the first score because it means nothing.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 6, 2011 9:25am
If the first score meant nothing, and was correct, he would not have mentioned it at all.enigmaax;883533 wrote:Or maybe, the fact that he consistently refers to one score and not two means he is completely disregarding the irrelevant (from his perspective) lower score?
There is only one score that matters to this guy so he can't talk his terms and not lie about the first score because it means nothing.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Sep 6, 2011 10:11am
No point in trying to argue with them LJ. No matter what anybody says, Terrelle Pryor scored a 7 on his Wonderlic Test. It really is sad that their hate is that strong for him.