BigAppleBuckeye
Posts: 2,935
Sep 1, 2011 9:43am
I am the OP, and I am a Buckeye fan. How am I a troll again?Pick6;878858 wrote:nice fail, trolls
I love when someone posts something that doesn't stroke off the popular team, its trolling. SMH
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Sep 1, 2011 9:54am
again, what does this have to do with Ohio State? TP is in the NFL nowBigAppleBuckeye;879116 wrote:I am the OP, and I am a Buckeye fan. How am I a troll again?
I love when someone posts something that doesn't stroke off the popular team, its trolling. SMH
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Sep 1, 2011 10:06am
Wow....lame! :thumbdown:Tiernan;879091 wrote:I did hear he got the Tattoo question correct.
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Sep 1, 2011 10:18am
7 is one better than VY
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Sep 1, 2011 10:25am
Why not, dude? I happen to think a lack of intelligence is not something to make fun of, and how can you say everyone made fun of VY--I didn't...dude :rolleyes:sherm03;879100 wrote:No need to get all defensive dude. Everyone was making fun of Vince Young for scoring a 9.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Sep 1, 2011 11:57am
give me a break. TP is a moron, who cares if people make fun of him? Seriously?
BigAppleBuckeye
Posts: 2,935
Sep 1, 2011 12:19pm
It has to do with you needing a clue about what a troll is.Pick6;879126 wrote:again, what does this have to do with Ohio State? TP is in the NFL now
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Sep 1, 2011 12:24pm
If Denard Robinson scores a 7 in a few years, I bet you bring up Michigan...Pick6;879126 wrote:again, what does this have to do with Ohio State? TP is in the NFL now
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Sep 1, 2011 12:50pm
right.ts1227;879309 wrote:If Denard Robinson scores a 7 in a few years, I bet you bring up Michigan...
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Sep 1, 2011 1:00pm
BigAppleBuckeye;879116 wrote:I am the OP, and I am a Buckeye fan. How am I a troll again?
I love when someone posts something that doesn't stroke off the popular team, its trolling. SMH
Hey stop picking on TP!!!
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Sep 1, 2011 1:01pm
When added to the scorecard, these two are eerily similar:gerb131;879150 wrote:7 is one better than VY
Career Record: VY 30-2 TP 19-4
BCS Wins: VY 2 TP 1
Heismans: VY 0 TP 0
National Titles: VY 1 TP 0
Wonderlic: TP 7 VY 6
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Sep 1, 2011 1:45pm
enigmaax;879357 wrote:When added to the scorecard, these two are eerily similar:
Career Record: VY 30-2 TP 19-4
BCS Wins: VY 2 TP 1
Heismans: VY 0 TP 0
National Titles: VY 1 TP 0
Wonderlic: TP 7 VY 6
VY had 10+ more wins and a Title. Really not that close.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Sep 1, 2011 2:12pm
If you include the "vacated" games that everyone saw OSU win, the numbers actually are very similar outside of the national championship. Puts his record at 31-4 and BCS wins at 2.
7 is a really bad score though.
7 is a really bad score though.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Sep 1, 2011 2:35pm
Why is this in the CFB forum in the first place? This A-hole is gone from OSU and now resides in the NFL should be in the Pro sports column.
and yes WHEN not IF Denard Robinson scores a "5" in the Wonderlic we will bring it up.
and yes WHEN not IF Denard Robinson scores a "5" in the Wonderlic we will bring it up.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Sep 1, 2011 4:42pm
Ah, good point.Scarlet_Buckeye;879414 wrote:VY had 10+ more wins and a Title. Really not that close.
Did you miss the "vacated" part? They don't count.Mulva;879460 wrote:If you include the "vacated" games that everyone saw OSU win, the numbers actually are very similar outside of the national championship. Puts his record at 31-4 and BCS wins at 2.
Being that he is only 2 months removed from being an OSU student, certainly this reflects on the type of people and athletes that are churned out by the football factory.Tiernan;879489 wrote:Why is this in the CFB forum in the first place?
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Sep 1, 2011 5:15pm
Strange, I just counted them.enigmaax;879615 wrote:Did you miss the "vacated" part? They don't count.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Sep 1, 2011 5:32pm
You should not enable cheaters. Just accept it.Mulva;879651 wrote:Strange, I just counted them.
Z
Zoltan
Posts: 1,003
Sep 2, 2011 8:30am
Isn't it amazing that even though it's not true, people are still claiming he got a seven in this thread? It just shows that the first media report is often the one everyone believes and remembers. People will be throwing that seven out their for years, even though it didn't happen.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Sep 2, 2011 10:10am
Does anyone really know what he scored? The guy who administered the test said the seven is not accurate, but follows that up with "we always go with the higher Wonderlic score." The report is still that he DID score a 7 the first time and then did "significantly" better, but all the scouts care about is the higher score. There's a difference between what may have actually happened the first time (7) and what ends up being the final result (21/22, whatever).Zoltan;880087 wrote:Isn't it amazing that even though it's not true, people are still claiming he got a seven in this thread? It just shows that the first media report is often the one everyone believes and remembers. People will be throwing that seven out their for years, even though it didn't happen.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/15512782/qb-pryor-took-second-wonderlic-after-low-first-score/rss
Now, if you are going strictly on what TP tweeted, I'll just remind you that he also implied in a tweet several months ago that his tattoo payments were all on the up-and-up. Dude is not a reliabe source, especially when he's talking about himself.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 2, 2011 10:35am
Except the guy who orig. reported it is in Wisconsin and has no connections to OSU, the Steelers or the Raiders.enigmaax;880177 wrote:Does anyone really know what he scored? The guy who administered the test said the seven is not accurate, but follows that up with "we always go with the higher Wonderlic score." The report is still that he DID score a 7 the first time and then did "significantly" better, but all the scouts care about is the higher score. There's a difference between what may have actually happened the first time (7) and what ends up being the final result (21/22, whatever).
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/15512782/qb-pryor-took-second-wonderlic-after-low-first-score/rss
Now, if you are going strictly on what TP tweeted, I'll just remind you that he also implied in a tweet several months ago that his tattoo payments were all on the up-and-up. Dude is not a reliabe source, especially when he's talking about himself.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Sep 2, 2011 11:16am
Not sure why that would matter. Any NFL team who was interested in Pryor would've gotten the results.LJ;880206 wrote:Except the guy who orig. reported it is in Wisconsin and has no connections to OSU, the Steelers or the Raiders.
The more damaging thing to the original reporter's credibility (in my mind) is the article, itself. Terrible, terrible read. You thought some of the OSU reports with anonymous sources were bad, check out this guy's use of "probably" and "some".
http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/128838323.html
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Sep 2, 2011 11:54am
Uhm... pretty sure he scored a 7 the first time around... and improved his score to a 22 his second time.Zoltan;880087 wrote:Isn't it amazing that even though it's not true, people are still claiming he got a seven in this thread? It just shows that the first media report is often the one everyone believes and remembers. People will be throwing that seven out their for years, even though it didn't happen.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 2, 2011 12:08pm
False per the guy who gave him the testScarlet_Buckeye;880341 wrote:Uhm... pretty sure he scored a 7 the first time around...
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Sep 2, 2011 12:36pm
The guy who gave him the test said he scored "significantly higher" than a 7. The same guy then said Pryor scored "significantly higher" the 2nd time around than the 1st.LJ;880363 wrote:False per the guy who gave him the test
If Pryor only scored a 22 on the 2nd time around, then what would he have "significantly improved" from?
It looks to me like the guy who administered the test is trying to protect Pryor.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 2, 2011 12:40pm
Scarlet_Buckeye;880408 wrote:The guy who gave him the test said he scored "significantly higher" than a 7. The same guy then said Pryor scored "significantly higher" the 2nd time around than the 1st.
If Pryor only scored a 22 on the 2nd time around, then what would he have "significantly improved" from?
It looks to me like the guy who administered the test is trying to protect Pryor.
The report of a seven test score is erroneous," Colbert said. "I administered both tests and I can tell you that his score was significantly higher than that. I informed all teams and scouts interested in him about the score. In scouting, we always go with the higher Wonderlic score.
There ya go