What say you?
Tobias Fünke;856991 wrote:Connery
Brosnan
Craig
...the rest
'That's not what your Mom said Trebek...ha ha ha'Tobias Fünke;857043 wrote:Brosnan was the man. He was definitely smoother than Craig is. Craig is a bull in a china shop.
I tend to agree Gut. Connery was a bad ass as Bond, yet hated being the character. Moore embraced it in a smarmy sort of way. Like I posted earlier I always thought of Moore as Bond...until I saw Connery as Bond....they both were different and great in their own way. Making the same character different.gut;857089 wrote:Ha! I guess I, too, am in the minority. Connery was great, but I really liked what Roger Moore brought to the table. IMO, Moore pulled off more arrogance, and better, which for me was a better fit for the character. Connery was smooth, Moore was brash and I think it comes down to what you think works better.
Curly J;857090 wrote:I tend to agree Gut. Connery was a bad ass as Bond, yet hated being the character. Moore embraced it in a smarmy sort of way. Like I posted earlier I always thought of Moore as Bond...until I saw Connery as Bond....they both were different and great in their own way. Making the same character different.

Y-Town Steelhound;857363 wrote:Sean Connery for sure. Though Daniel Craig's Bond would win in a fight with all of them. He seems to be the most "bad-ass" if not quite as "smooth".
gut;857377 wrote:On a related note, sad to see the Bond films go the way of cheap Hollywood explosions and special effects. The story really suffers.
Niven starred in a spoof Bond film (non-canon, therefore, why Niven isn't included) according to here: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/JamesBondernest_t_bass;857182 wrote:I just did a quick Wiki search and got the table above. Anyone have any idea why this one would have been left out:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061452/
Bond: David Niven
OSH;857261 wrote:No love for Timothy Dalton?!
Fred Garvin;857404 wrote:Anybody but George Lazenby.