Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jul 8, 2011 1:00pm
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jul 8, 2011 1:04pm
Smart decision to be proactive, but I would think it's still going to cost them some scholarships.
It may spare them the postseason ban if they are lucky, IMO.
It may spare them the postseason ban if they are lucky, IMO.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jul 8, 2011 1:07pm
Vacating wins has no affect on anything but the record books, I imagine a few schollies will be gone as well.
P
Prescott
Posts: 2,569
Jul 8, 2011 1:19pm
Thank you, Jim Tressel.
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Jul 8, 2011 1:23pm
Im just ready for this shit to be over with.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jul 8, 2011 1:24pm
Good.
Now we can move on and continue to win football games and set the standard for excellence in the classroom. We're still 100000x the program ND/Michigan/Random SEC team will ever be.
Now we can move on and continue to win football games and set the standard for excellence in the classroom. We're still 100000x the program ND/Michigan/Random SEC team will ever be.
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Jul 8, 2011 1:25pm
What a freaking joke. Vacate wins and that is all? Maybe if they would have fired Tressel. But to allow him to retire and pay him, and then try to say you disassociated is as pathetic as Tressel's original presser.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jul 8, 2011 1:26pm
thedynasty1998;824680 wrote:What a freaking joke. Vacate wins and that is all? Maybe if they would have fired Tressel. But to allow him to retire and pay him, and then try to say you disassociated is as pathetic as Tressel's original presser.
That is all? The NCAA still has to make a ruling. There is more to come.
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Jul 8, 2011 1:29pm
se-alum;824668 wrote:Vacating wins has no affect on anything but the record books, I imagine a few schollies will be gone as well.
I don't. This had nothing to do with recruiting. None should be lost.
BigAppleBuckeye
Posts: 2,935
Jul 8, 2011 1:30pm
I am seeing on all the sites that OSU is vacating "2010 wins" ... does that include the Sugar Bowl (in 2011)? Can't find a straight answer yet.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jul 8, 2011 1:31pm
BigAppleBuckeye;824685 wrote:I am seeing on all the sites that OSU is vacating "2010 wins" ... does that include the Sugar Bowl (in 2011)? Can't find a straight answer yet.
Yes. First line of the story on ESPN...
Ohio State has vacated all of its football wins from the 2010 season, including its 2011 Allstate Sugar Bowl victory.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jul 8, 2011 1:32pm
I believe it does include the 2011 sugar bowl.
I don't expect any further punishment and would be absolutely shocked if any additional punishment includes a bowl ban. Maybe a few scholarships will be lost, but we'll be playing in a bowl game, and likely it will be for a championship(which the haters will be pissed about because their team will be playing in the Upstairs Medical College Bowl sponsored by Toilet Paper Inc, and Papa Johns).
I don't expect any further punishment and would be absolutely shocked if any additional punishment includes a bowl ban. Maybe a few scholarships will be lost, but we'll be playing in a bowl game, and likely it will be for a championship(which the haters will be pissed about because their team will be playing in the Upstairs Medical College Bowl sponsored by Toilet Paper Inc, and Papa Johns).
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jul 8, 2011 1:33pm
thedynasty1998;824680 wrote:I'm a freaking joke.
Fixed.
BigAppleBuckeye
Posts: 2,935
Jul 8, 2011 1:35pm
wildcats20;824688 wrote:Yes. First line of the story on ESPN...
Yes, I see that now, when I checked the first time it wasn't there.
My first reaction was "Why would OSU voluntarily do this?" ... but then reality set in: this is just the beginning, particularly if OSU is doing this as a token gesture to the NCAA. I wish I would share sleeper's optimism here, but I am feeling the polar opposite way ...
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jul 8, 2011 1:41pm
You will almost always see self-imposed sanctions in situations like this. I am not surprised at all.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Jul 8, 2011 1:44pm
Seriously?sleeper;824689 wrote:I believe it does include the 2011 sugar bowl.
I don't expect any further punishment and would be absolutely shocked if any additional punishment includes a bowl ban. Maybe a few scholarships will be lost, but we'll be playing in a bowl game, and likely it will be for a championship(which the haters will be pissed about because their team will be playing in the Upstairs Medical College Bowl sponsored by Toilet Paper Inc, and Papa Johns).
stroups
Posts: 3,223
Jul 8, 2011 1:47pm
I expect the NCAA to reduce some scholarships but I don't really expect a bowl ban. I kind of wish we would of imposed 3 less schollys for 3 years just to set the tone. It would be retarded for us to self impose a 1 year bowl ban considering that would probably be the max we get.
BigAppleBuckeye
Posts: 2,935
Jul 8, 2011 1:47pm
wildcats20;824697 wrote:You will almost always see self-imposed sanctions in situations like this. I am not surprised at all.
Agreed, but was surprised by vacating the bowl win, as the NCAA allowed those players to play that game.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 8, 2011 1:47pm
myguythetorg the torg
OSU vacates wins and puts itself on probation. Anyone buying this as final punishment? I cant wait 2 take calls from the kool aid drinkers
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jul 8, 2011 1:48pm
Hb31187;824699 wrote:Seriously?
Look at who wrote it.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jul 8, 2011 1:51pm
I'm hoping for a bowl ban only.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Jul 8, 2011 1:52pm
ts1227;824705 wrote:Look at who wrote it.
Lol, noted
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jul 8, 2011 1:53pm
I don't think the NCAA will issue a bowl ban, nor do I think the all-mighty BCS will allow it. The Ohio State Buckeyes are one of the best, if not THE best traveling football fan bases in all of college football.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jul 8, 2011 1:55pm
I don't expect much more. There were alot of media outlets spewing allegations, and NONE of it was proven. Tressel and Pryor are gone, and the 2010 season is gone, other than a couple of schollies, I don't see much else happening.BigAppleBuckeye;824693 wrote:Yes, I see that now, when I checked the first time it wasn't there.
My first reaction was "Why would OSU voluntarily do this?" ... but then reality set in: this is just the beginning, particularly if OSU is doing this as a token gesture to the NCAA. I wish I would share sleeper's optimism here, but I am feeling the polar opposite way ...
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jul 8, 2011 1:55pm
BigAppleBuckeye;824702 wrote:Agreed, but was surprised by vacating the bowl win, as the NCAA allowed those players to play that game.
I'm surprised too. I think it is just the university saying "we don't want any of this dirtyness" trying to lessen any blows even further. I don't think the NCAA would have forced them to vacate the Sugar Bowl.