data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 18, 2011 6:57pm
surprisingly the Arizona-Cleveland game has been a dandy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Dec 18, 2011 6:58pm
Wouldn't Oakland have it over Denver for the division?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 18, 2011 7:00pm
Denver would still lead the division
8-6 vs. 8-6 overall
split the head-to-head
Denver 3-2 in division, Oakland 2-2
8-6 vs. 8-6 overall
split the head-to-head
Denver 3-2 in division, Oakland 2-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Dec 18, 2011 7:01pm
Looks like Denver has the better AFC record too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abc56/abc56cad34c8dac4e7ac6a708a1af18d0fe8fbe0" alt="tk421's avatar"
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Dec 18, 2011 7:01pm
Broncos D just can't stop Brady, it's not Tebow or the offense this game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Dec 18, 2011 7:02pm
Heck Detroit isn't out of this either...Palmer misses another huge one...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 18, 2011 7:02pm
Well, wait a second
Oakland, Cincinnat and the Jets would be 8-6
Oakland beat the Jets but because all three are tied and did not play, it would go to conference record
Jets 6-5 vs. Bengals 6-5
then I think Jets have the next tiebreaker
Oakland, Cincinnat and the Jets would be 8-6
Oakland beat the Jets but because all three are tied and did not play, it would go to conference record
Jets 6-5 vs. Bengals 6-5
then I think Jets have the next tiebreaker
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdd58/bdd58d85797e0a3c6dc786c956196d5cb593189f" alt="Crimson streak's avatar"
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Dec 18, 2011 7:02pm
Brady says fuck tebow time
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Dec 18, 2011 7:03pm
Well the Raiders aren't 8-6 yet haha...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 18, 2011 7:05pm
if you use the ESPN playoff machine and all three teams end up 10-6, it's giving Oakland the nod
but maybe as of this evening, the Jets would be ahead...since the tiebreakers are incomplete
Lions may still win that one
but maybe as of this evening, the Jets would be ahead...since the tiebreakers are incomplete
Lions may still win that one
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c1ea/8c1ea78203ac0a233142582cfa043a5430d6e06b" alt="Pick6's avatar"
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Dec 18, 2011 7:05pm
didnt the offense turn it over multiple times deep in their own territory? mr tebow needs to learn there is 4 quarters in a game, not one or two.tk421;1019197 wrote:Broncos D just can't stop Brady, it's not Tebow or the offense this game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c1ea/8c1ea78203ac0a233142582cfa043a5430d6e06b" alt="Pick6's avatar"
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Dec 18, 2011 7:07pm
doesnt matter, september said the jets are done, which is false.Non;1019201 wrote:Well, wait a second
Oakland, Cincinnat and the Jets would be 8-6
Oakland beat the Jets but because all three are tied and did not play, it would go to conference record
Jets 6-5 vs. Bengals 6-5
then I think Jets have the next tiebreaker
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/118c7/118c7b2f936579e8a519ad63600cc64074a46559" alt="Skyhook79's avatar"
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Dec 18, 2011 7:09pm
Tebow has played fine other than the fumble he had. The Broncos only had 7 plays the entire 2nd qtr. Their defense has given up 4 -80+ yd drives to the Pats.Pick6;1019208 wrote:didnt the offense turn it over multiple times deep in their own territory? mr tebow needs to learn there is 4 quarters in a game, not one or two.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abc56/abc56cad34c8dac4e7ac6a708a1af18d0fe8fbe0" alt="tk421's avatar"
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Dec 18, 2011 7:09pm
How is it Tebow's fault that the running back fumbled and that the punt returner muffed the kick? Explain that to me. Other than the ball that was knocked out of his hand, Tebow has played pretty good this game. Hard to do anything when you are on the sidelines because the D can't get off the field.Pick6;1019208 wrote:didnt the offense turn it over multiple times deep in their own territory? mr tebow needs to learn there is 4 quarters in a game, not one or two.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 18, 2011 7:14pm
Detroit scored for the lead
didn't see it but must've been about a 90-yard drive
didn't see it but must've been about a 90-yard drive
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fb5c/6fb5c61b48f0a55c5f62634e92ded0befc835672" alt="september63's avatar".jpg)
september63
Posts: 5,789
Dec 18, 2011 7:15pm
They are done!! I didnt say mathematically, I just see a deflated team after getting blasted by the Eagles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abc56/abc56cad34c8dac4e7ac6a708a1af18d0fe8fbe0" alt="tk421's avatar"
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Dec 18, 2011 7:16pm
Thanks to Detroit, this game won't matter for the Broncos. They'll still have a 1 game lead for the division.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 18, 2011 7:17pm
Im surprised patty boy didn't choose to kick the ball off.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Dec 18, 2011 7:19pm
If all 3 win out, all would be 7-5 in the AFC.
Tiebreaker #4 - Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
Common opponents would be:
Oakland vs Cincinnati -Raiders vs Denver X 2, Buffalo, Miami and Cleveland (2-3 record) vs Bengals vs these teams (4-1)
Oakland vs New York - Raiders vs Denver, Buffalo, New England, Kansas City X 2, Miami, San Diego (4-5 record) OR Jets vs those teams (6-3 record)
New York vs Cincinnati - Jets vs Baltimore, Buffalo X 2, Denver, Jacksonville (3-2 record) OR Bengals vs those teams (3-2 record)
Bengals would win third tiebreaker over the Raiders and tie it with the Jets. The Jets would win it over the Raiders as well. This would mean the Bengals and Jets would then break the tie with strength of victory tiebreaker...
Tiebreaker #4 - Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
Common opponents would be:
Oakland vs Cincinnati -Raiders vs Denver X 2, Buffalo, Miami and Cleveland (2-3 record) vs Bengals vs these teams (4-1)
Oakland vs New York - Raiders vs Denver, Buffalo, New England, Kansas City X 2, Miami, San Diego (4-5 record) OR Jets vs those teams (6-3 record)
New York vs Cincinnati - Jets vs Baltimore, Buffalo X 2, Denver, Jacksonville (3-2 record) OR Bengals vs those teams (3-2 record)
Bengals would win third tiebreaker over the Raiders and tie it with the Jets. The Jets would win it over the Raiders as well. This would mean the Bengals and Jets would then break the tie with strength of victory tiebreaker...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe6b/4fe6b4547c8454a59e70b8cece0bddf568256a67" alt="Laley23's avatar"
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Dec 18, 2011 7:23pm
It isnt. But if hes taking credit for Von Millers sacks and McGahees runs and etc, etc, etc he is gonna get the blame for when the RB fumbles.tk421;1019216 wrote:How is it Tebow's fault that the running back fumbled and that the punt returner muffed the kick? Explain that to me. Other than the ball that was knocked out of his hand, Tebow has played pretty good this game. Hard to do anything when you are on the sidelines because the D can't get off the field.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abc56/abc56cad34c8dac4e7ac6a708a1af18d0fe8fbe0" alt="tk421's avatar"
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Dec 18, 2011 7:24pm
Tebow's not taking credit for any of it, if you listen to his interviews he always gives credit to the team. ESPN and the media are the ones running the Tebow time, Tebowmania crap.Laley23;1019259 wrote:It isnt. But if hes taking credit for Von Millers sacks and McGahees runs and etc, etc, etc he is gonna get the blame for when the RB fumbles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/118c7/118c7b2f936579e8a519ad63600cc64074a46559" alt="Skyhook79's avatar"
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Dec 18, 2011 7:29pm
When did he do that or are you just making it up? I'm going to go with the latter.Laley23;1019259 wrote:It isnt. But if hes taking credit for Von Millers sacks and McGahees runs and etc, etc, etc he is gonna get the blame for when the RB fumbles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 18, 2011 7:33pm
from San Diego's perspective, if they win out
and the Jets and Bengals each lose one
the Chargers would be in
Jets have Giants and at Miami
Bengals have Arizona and Baltimore
Chargers play the Raiders the last game so they would have to beat them anyway to win out
and the Jets and Bengals each lose one
the Chargers would be in
Jets have Giants and at Miami
Bengals have Arizona and Baltimore
Chargers play the Raiders the last game so they would have to beat them anyway to win out
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63ce5/63ce500e8784460d0e12b47f7deb7582738788ef" alt="Hamler Bulldogs's avatar"
Hamler Bulldogs
Posts: 96
Dec 18, 2011 7:52pm
It was a 99 yard drive,the frickin Raiders played good defense for once in a game,then they step on their d__cks on that drive,I can't take any more from these so called defensive coaches of the raiders.Non;1019235 wrote:Detroit scored for the lead
didn't see it but must've been about a 90-yard drive
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe6b/4fe6b4547c8454a59e70b8cece0bddf568256a67" alt="Laley23's avatar"
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Dec 18, 2011 7:58pm
tk421;1019262 wrote:Tebow's not taking credit for any of it, if you listen to his interviews he always gives credit to the team. ESPN and the media are the ones running the Tebow time, Tebowmania crap.
It was really that complicated to figure out what I meant in response to you?Skyhook79;1019276 wrote:When did he do that or are you just making it up? I'm going to go with the latter.
Tim Tebow is getting credit for all the wins. He should have to take the fault for all the Ls. I wasnt implying he was taking the credit himself. I really like Tebow as a person, I just dont think he is any good at QBing. All I get are the Ws in the argument, for the most part. Despite him playing poorly thats all anyone talks about. So no matter how well he plays in a loss, the same principle should be applied.