SportsAndLady;929501 wrote:Your original point was it was a stupid challenge because it's only 4-5 yards....that's so stupid. The point wasn't how many yards they'd gain, it's the dfiference between defending a 1st and 10 vs 3rd and 13.

You should know this non, you're a Steelers fan...their good football gives u intelligence.

Non;929505 wrote:Too early to be left with one more challenge the rest of the game.

0-0 score, midway through the first

There's so much that can happen.

But if they saw that back camera angle which showed it clearly, then it was a good challenge.

The first look when Gruden and Jaworski were questioning whether it was tipped or wobbly was not clear. That's what I was going off of.

Non;929505 wrote:Too early to be left with one more challenge the rest of the game.

0-0 score

There's so much that can happen.

Mulva;929517 wrote:Megatron you fucking cheater.

SportsAndLady;929514 wrote:Lol again...

Your point wasn't whether the challenge would be successful...it was because it was only a matter of 4-5 yards (which was completely untrue).

Non;929523 wrote:my point was you can't risk losing it there...because it's only 4-5 yards

Non;929523 wrote:my point was you can't risk losing it there

too early, Bears weren't even at the 50 yard line

you have to be sure you'll get the call

Laley23;929531 wrote:That ridiculous. A chance to get the ball back versus a first and ten. you have 2 challenges, and 3 if you get them right. I dont know what you saw, but that ball was tipped in live action. Jaws said it immediately. The replay we saw showed it. It was a great challenge.

Non;929538 wrote:The live angle didn't show it was clearly tipped. You're just saying that now.

Jaws said he thought it must've been because Cutler throws the ball so well.

Then they all looked at the replay and nobody was sure. It was inconclusive.

The back angle when they showed several different ones confirmed it was tipped.

You don't put that much stock into one possession like that early in the game. Coaches do that all the time they'll challenge one early first down catch and it won't mean anything to the outcome.

Non;929538 wrote: You don't put that much stock into one possession like that early in the game.

SportsAndLady;929546 wrote:Does a first half timeout really mean that much to you? lol

Non;929562 wrote:Alright. It's no big deal.

I'm not going to argue about that play the whole game.

The essence of point has been made and you know I'm right.

DeyDurkie5;929563 wrote:you have literally everyone arguing against you. I'd say you are wrong in this instance.

Non;929565 wrote:Watch the rest of the year and you'll see games where coaches will challenge a short pass/trap play and lose a challenge and then later on they'll be out of them in a pivotal situation.

Non;929565 wrote:Watch the rest of the year and you'll see games where coaches will challenge a short pass/trap play and lose a challenge and then later on they'll be out of them in a pivotal situation.

Laley23;929593 wrote:You are so arrogant its insane. It didnt mean anything because the dumb Lions committed like 4 more penalties to give them first downs. You have the chance to get the ball back, you take it. To argue otherwise is ridiculous. Plenty of times in a game a play that early can be the difference. Id be stunned if Detroit needed 2 more challenges tonight.