Thread Bomber
Posts: 1,851
Jun 13, 2011 12:57pm
I Wear Pants;800705 wrote:I think the censor is making me be more profane. In fact, when I get bored and drunk later I'm going to make a thread wherin I systematically post things that break every one of AdSense's rules.
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Jun 13, 2011 1:49pm
Is there a "F" ... Paternest_t_bass;800440 wrote:****, ****, ass, damn, ****, ***, ****er, ****ing, ****, bitch
Pat Sajak : Yes there are
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 13, 2011 3:10pm
You forgot a sweet-ass beer as well.Curly J;799618 wrote:Real Close, he needs a Cigar in his left hand...or ETB needs to draw one in there...and add a bubble saying "R is for Rats. Big F'n Rats with Dicks this big !!!"
Bob Saget!The Equalizer;800467 wrote:ETB may have Tourettes
nc52
Posts: 419
Jun 13, 2011 11:21pm
evidently google doesn't believe in freedom of speech
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jun 13, 2011 11:22pm
nc52;801656 wrote:evidently google doesn't believe in freedom of speech
No such thing as freedom of speech, it's all propaganda
password
Posts: 2,360
Jun 13, 2011 11:35pm
Hit up some of the new Casino and Horse Track venues about advertising on the site, They don't care what language you have on the site if they gain patrons from the advertising.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 14, 2011 12:14am
nc52;801656 wrote:evidently google doesn't believe in freedom of speech
No they do. You are free to say whatever you wish on your site.
But they are equally as free to not associate with such sites professionally.
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Jun 14, 2011 4:58pm
What if you make it required to register a username to read anything on the site? Google would then have to register names to even see threads possibly. I haven't read pages 2-5 on here so if it was suggested before, please forgive me as I am way too lazy right now.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 14, 2011 5:50pm
Problem with that is:Nate;802391 wrote:What if you make it required to register a username to read anything on the site? Google would then have to register names to even see threads possibly. I haven't read pages 2-5 on here so if it was suggested before, please forgive me as I am way too lazy right now.
(A) the spiders are what Google uses to rank webpages in Google. No ranking means less traffic. Less traffic means less revenue.
(B) If they can track the ads on the pages, they need access to them (they don't need it, but they "need" it).
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jun 14, 2011 11:05pm
O-Trap;802405 wrote:Problem with that is:
(A) the spiders are what Google uses to rank webpages in Google. No ranking means less traffic. Less traffic means less revenue.
(B) If they can track the ads on the pages, they need access to them (they don't need it, but they "need" it).
Your mom
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 14, 2011 11:31pm
ernest_t_bass;802680 wrote:Your mom
She iz teh googulz!
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jun 15, 2011 9:12am
O-Trap;802744 wrote:She iz teh googulz!
Looks like someone ate Fruity Pebbles this morning, SMH
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 15, 2011 11:08am
Negative, Ghostrider.
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Jun 16, 2011 2:18pm
So, did the swear filter make it all better?
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jun 16, 2011 2:27pm
O-Trap;803196 wrote:Negative, Ghostrider.
That was a stupid thing to say!
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 16, 2011 2:29pm
K.coyotes22;804671 wrote:That was a stupid thing to say!
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jun 16, 2011 2:36pm
Amirite?
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 16, 2011 2:37pm
Sure.coyotes22;804689 wrote:Amirite?
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jun 16, 2011 2:39pm
Pissy?
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 16, 2011 4:53pm
Thrice today!coyotes22;804695 wrote:Pissy?
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jun 16, 2011 9:46pm
O-Trap;804830 wrote:Thrice today!
Better have that checked!!!
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 16, 2011 9:51pm
coyotes22;805090 wrote:Better have that checked!!!
I apparently have a prostate the size of a pea.
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jun 17, 2011 6:52am
O-Trap;805098 wrote:I apparently have a prostate the size of a pea.
Indeed!
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jun 17, 2011 7:20am
coyotes22;805306 wrote:Indeed!
Indeed!
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jun 17, 2011 7:23am
O-Trap;805313 wrote:Indeed!
K.