Archive LOL Tony Weiner

fish82

Posts: 4,111

Jun 1, 2011 5:19pm

I don't think there's anyone on the Hill that I would rejoice in seeing bite the dust than this smarmy little dooshbag.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/01/rep-weiner-knocks-questions-lewd-photo-says-wont-distracted/

Nice job, Tony.

LJ

Posts: 16,351

Jun 2, 2011 9:48am

Of all the weiner threads, this one has the most info lol

S

stlouiedipalma

Posts: 1,797

Jun 2, 2011 10:28am

Sure sounds to me like Weiner got caught with his pants down (or is it up?). When are these idiots going to learn that concise, honest responses to scandalous behavior are the only way to go? His backpedaling and non-denial-denials sure make him look guilty in my eyes.

I guess he now joins all of those other idiots who were caught in a compromising position.

O

ou1980

Posts: 877

Jun 2, 2011 11:34am

Why hasn't the FBI been called to investigate a congressmans computer being hacked? If it was hacked then that person needs to be prosecuted, end of discussion! But if it was Weiners wiener in that picture, well, there goes his career.

cruiser_96

Posts: 7,536

Jun 2, 2011 12:21pm

It's Bush's fault.

Mr. 300

Posts: 3,090

Jun 2, 2011 1:11pm

Anything less then resignation is unnacceptable/

BGFalcons82

Posts: 2,173

Jun 2, 2011 2:09pm

Mark Foley was the poster child for this type of behavior in 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley_congressional_page_incident

Since the scandal broke the last week or so of the campaign, many have opined that his texting shenanigans led to the D's overtaking Congress. Nancy proclaimed she would drain the swamp of such people should she be elected speaker after the Foley incident. As we all know, it was never drained, new species emerged, and now Weiner has joined his ilk in the murky swamp. Where is the outrage? Where are the calls for his head? What's Nancy think about this? Has the FBI started their investigation? crickets from the Left.

FatHobbit

Posts: 8,651

Jun 2, 2011 2:31pm

Weiner, 46, is married to Huma Abedin, an aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

He's married to the woman who was rumored to be Hillary's lesbian lover.

majorspark

Posts: 5,122

Jun 2, 2011 2:53pm

I hear the mystery weiner was not bun length.

majorspark

Posts: 5,122

Jun 2, 2011 2:56pm

I also hear Barney Frank is demanding a full congressional inquiry into weiner-gate. He has volunteered to head the committee.

Apple

Posts: 2,620

Jun 2, 2011 3:08pm

From Bill O'Reilly:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/06/02/oreilly_why_the_congressman_weiner-twitter_story_is_important.html

From Jon Stewart on Daily Show:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/06/01/daily_show_host_stewart_on_anthony_weiner_hes_just_not_that_big.html

B

berry

Posts: 475

Jun 2, 2011 5:27pm

His wife is Huma Weiner? At least he has that going for him.

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Jun 2, 2011 5:45pm

People get Twitter hacked a lot. Has there been anything that even comes remotely close to proving it's him?

fish82

Posts: 4,111

Jun 2, 2011 5:53pm

I Wear Pants;788829 wrote:People get Twitter hacked a lot. Has there been anything that even comes remotely close to proving it's him?

It came from his account. If he wants to claim he was hacked, that's on him to prove. In fact...if he was hacked, he'd already have the the proof out there.

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Jun 2, 2011 6:04pm

fish82;788832 wrote:It came from his account. If he wants to claim he was hacked, that's on him to prove. In fact...if he was hacked, he'd already have the the proof out there.

Well there was a blog (per the John Stewart video) that said that the exif data on the photo didn't match the camera it claimed to be from or something like that.

And when did we turn into "guilty until proven innocent"?

M

Manhattan Buckeye

Posts: 7,566

Jun 2, 2011 7:42pm

I Wear Pants;788844 wrote:Well there was a blog (per the John Stewart video) that said that the exif data on the photo didn't match the camera it claimed to be from or something like that.

And when did we turn into "guilty until proven innocent"?

I don't know whether he sent it or not, but his reaction thus far makes it VERY obvious even if he didn't he has stuff on his account/computer he doesn't want out. That's not "guilty until proven innocent", that's a common sense logical reaction to his weird behavior - if someone did this to me I'd want the guy caught, mainly because I don't have anything to hide in my twitter account - which I never use.

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Jun 2, 2011 7:48pm

It's nearly impossible to have anything to hide in a twitter account as pretty much everything about them is publicly viewable.

fish82

Posts: 4,111

Jun 2, 2011 8:01pm

I Wear Pants;788844 wrote:Well there was a blog (per the John Stewart video) that said that the exif data on the photo didn't match the camera it claimed to be from or something like that.

And when did we turn into "guilty until proven innocent"?

If that was the case, his office would be pushing that info faster than shit through a goose. The fact that they're not pretty much brands it as dubious.

fish82

Posts: 4,111

Jun 2, 2011 8:33pm

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110602/ap_on_go_co/us_congressman_twitter_photos

I think this sums it up quite nicely:

Weiner has hired an attorney and a private firm to investigate. But Twitter's policy states it will not provide information about postings without a subpoena, court order or other legal documents, raising questions about why law enforcement wasn't investigating a possible cybercrime against a member of Congress.

Kimberly Schneider, a spokeswoman for the Capitol Police, said Thursday the department was not probing the incident, because "we have not been asked to investigate."

By hiring a private firm, Weiner controls the release of information about the investigation.

If he was hacked, the Capitol Police would be investigating. Period.

majorspark

Posts: 5,122

Jun 2, 2011 9:27pm

fish82;788960 wrote:If he was hacked, the Capitol Police would be investigating. Period.

Exactly. Why would they investigate. Its not a crime for one adult to send a picture of their wiener concealed behind a pair of briefs to another adult.

Apple

Posts: 2,620

Jun 2, 2011 11:59pm

It would not surprise me if people who have been following these events come to the conclusion that Weiner is a dick.

P

Prescott

Posts: 2,569

Jun 3, 2011 12:21am

Exactly. Why would they investigate.

To see if his account was hacked.

majorspark

Posts: 5,122

Jun 3, 2011 12:30am

Prescott;789595 wrote:To see if his account was hacked.

Apparently they don't suspect it was hacked or they would investigate. That is my point.

believer

Posts: 8,153

Jun 3, 2011 4:04am

stlouiedipalma;788474 wrote:I guess he now joins all of those other idiots who were caught in a compromising position.

Compromising position? That's one way of describing it! lol

majorspark;788697 wrote:I also hear Barney Frank is demanding a full congressional inquiry into weiner-gate. He has volunteered to head the committee.

More like he has volunteered to give head to the committee.

Apple;789539 wrote:It would not surprise me if people who have been following these events come to the conclusion that Weiner is a dick.

Oh I'd love to be an Oscar Meyer wiener, that is what I'd truly love to be.

S

stlouiedipalma

Posts: 1,797

Jun 3, 2011 5:25pm

ccrunner609;789090 wrote:I have seen him talking on TV the past few days.......he is 100% guilty by listening and watching him. He sounds like a total idiot denying that he did it but not being sure that it isnt his weiner. He such a cocky doushe that its just killing him that he just cant come out and brag about it.

He is like Nicholson character in A few good men.

BTW, the Barney Frank comment is a good one. That queer wants to see it for himself.

I guess that highlighted comment excuses you from any future jury duty, doesn't it? I don't know anyone with this power of determining the truth from listening and watching. You should take your talents on the road and make some serious jack with it.