But not for a decade or more. The problem was not just being as precise as you can be (and unintended deaths would have still happened but not as many) and then we wouldn't be in the situation where us, the people who had killed these civilians is then telling them how they should set up their government and etc. You can learn to forgive the cop that accidentally kills you loved one in pursuit of a criminal even if it was perhaps recklessly, but that doesn't mean you want him moving in next door.jhay78;1067115 wrote:Both of those scenarios would involve the unintended killing of scores of civilians, too. Just sayin. Maybe our problem is all that trying to rebuild after the bombing in an effort to make things better for the average civilian.
As for the debate. Romney still says whatever is expedient, Newt is obsessed with himself, and Santorum is scary. Paul is as usual the only one who doesn't scare me. And I loved how he responded to the question of his health.
