LJ;759238 wrote:Because one thinks that Unions are detrimental to the public means that one cannot appreciate what teachers do?
Interesting logic.
This was sort of what I was getting at.
Do teachers = unions? If so, then I agree, this is ironic.
If teachers are more than just union pawns, then there is no irony here.
majorspark;759305 wrote:Kasich hates teachers. If he gets his way teachers will be learning to like rice and beans all while Kasich feasts on steak, lobster, wine, and brie. He will not be happy until he sees teachers getting evicted from their homes. He will laugh when teachers are working summer jobs flipping burgers a McDonalds to help pay the rent in thier 2 bedroom apartment. Kasich will not be fully satisfied until retired teachers are barley eaking out an existence. Kids if your parents are teachers you better be prepared to take care of Mom and Dad when they are seniors.
This declaration is nothing more than a slap in the face.
lol'd much
queencitybuckeye;759782 wrote:I can only speak for myself. I'd almost certainly negotiate a better deal for myself than the union ever would.
No you wouldn't. You only think you would. The reality is that only the Union could negotiate any kind of decent deal for you. Without them, you make minimum wage and have terrible or nonexistent benefits. You can't be trusted to be responsible to get what you need. You don't have that ability. They have to do it for you, or you won't get anything.