The Alabama Crimson Tide are the 2010 BCS National Champions

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ The Alabama Crimson Tide are the 2010 BCS National Champions
D

dtdtim

Senior Member

358 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:16 PM
2quik4u wrote: I see why texas has 3 5 star receivers in this class because there current ones fucking suck
Haha...true, but most of the passes they are trying to catch aren't very stellar either.
Jan 7, 2010 11:16pm
C

charliehustle14

Senior Member

2,224 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:16 PM
Take VY to the locker room, put him in Malcolm Williams' uniform, and let him play some WR. No one will ever know.
Jan 7, 2010 11:16pm
I

ironman02

Senior Member

4,989 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:17 PM
Shouldn't everyone be calling Ingram a pussy for not being in the game?
Jan 7, 2010 11:17pm
just_a_swimmer's avatar

just_a_swimmer

Senior Member

674 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:17 PM
Now Ingram is hurting with cramps.

Man o Man.
Jan 7, 2010 11:17pm
D

DaBrowns41

Senior Member

1,304 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:17 PM
september63 wrote: Missed 2 pass Interference calls!!
Are you going to be THAT guy?

Are you going to pull a Rock_Knutne and try to convince people that 1 penalty won the game for the opposing team that won by two scores?

LMAO.
Jan 7, 2010 11:17pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:18 PM
I think Texas would've won with McCoy

I wanted Alabama to win and thought they were better

but Texas came out loose and full of fight

just the way both teams took the field I think Texas had it tonight but that changed everything
Jan 7, 2010 11:18pm
tk421's avatar

tk421

Senior Member

8,500 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:19 PM
Wow that ball wasn't even catchable. The ball was 5 - 10 yards under thrown. Bad call.
Jan 7, 2010 11:19pm
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:19 PM
I'm not convinced that that ball was catchable.
Jan 7, 2010 11:19pm
september63's avatar

september63

Senior Member

5,789 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:19 PM
You have to be shitting me!! PI on Texas after missing 2 against Bama?
Jan 7, 2010 11:19pm
D

DaBrowns41

Senior Member

1,304 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:19 PM
Non wrote: I think Texas would've won with McCoy

I wanted Alabama to win and thought they were better

but Texas came out loose and full of fight

just the way both teams took the field I think Texas had it tonight but that changed everything
McCoy is nothing special either. Outcome would have been the same. Some of you people overrate McCoy.
Jan 7, 2010 11:19pm
I

ironman02

Senior Member

4,989 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:19 PM
Piss poor call by the official on that one.
Jan 7, 2010 11:19pm
tk421's avatar

tk421

Senior Member

8,500 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:20 PM
Fucking face mask now. Or hands to the face. Texas needs a stop, yet they're killing themselves with penalties.
Jan 7, 2010 11:20pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:21 PM
Texas would've scored a touchdown on both of the first two possessions instead of field goals

and then Alabama had a couple series defensively where Gilbert was just afraid and had no chance

McCoy would've kept them moving and adding to the early 14-0 or 10-0 lead
Jan 7, 2010 11:21pm
I

ironman02

Senior Member

4,989 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:21 PM
DaBrowns41 wrote:
McCoy is nothing special either. Outcome would have been the same. Some of you people overrate McCoy.
I'm pretty sure the Texas offense would have been much better with McCoy than Gilbert. McCoy may not be the greatest QB ever, but he does happen to have won 45 college football games...you know, more than anyone in history.
Jan 7, 2010 11:21pm
R

rocket31

Senior Member

460 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:21 PM
Non wrote: I think Texas would've won with McCoy
lol
Jan 7, 2010 11:21pm
september63's avatar

september63

Senior Member

5,789 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:22 PM
DaBrowns41 wrote:
september63 wrote: Missed 2 pass Interference calls!!
Are you going to be THAT guy?

Are you going to pull a Rock_Knutne and try to convince people that 1 penalty won the game for the opposing team that won by two scores?

LMAO.
I didnt say that was why they were behind Dickface. I just said they blew 2 calls there and then give bama a questionablle PI call!!
Jan 7, 2010 11:22pm
D

DaBrowns41

Senior Member

1,304 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:22 PM
Non wrote: Texas would've scored a touchdown on both of the first two possessions instead of field goals

and then Alabama had a couple series defensively where Gilbert was just afraid and had no chance

McCoy would've kept them moving and adding to the early 14-0 or 10-0 lead
There's no way to know that for sure considering how badly McCoy struggles against real defenses. That's a dumb statement.
Jan 7, 2010 11:22pm
M

mallymal614

Senior Member

3,746 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:26 PM
Vince looks too fly!!!!
Jan 7, 2010 11:26pm
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:27 PM
dtdtim wrote:
mhs95_06 wrote: One game in the whole college football post season that means something, and it's a bust! Start with 16 teams seeded by a committee like the basketball 64. Then the first 8 games played within two weeks of the end of the season on the first Saturday of December at the home of the best seeded teams. Then the four 2nd round games on New Years Day at major bowl locations to maintain a tradition. Semi-finals 9-12 days later, and the NC game 8-13 days before the Super Bowl.
Yes that's fine and has nothing to do with what you were originally saying.

I tell you what, let's just screw the entire college football season and, at the beginning of December every year, enter the following teams into a 12-team playoff format to determine the national champion:

Alabama
Arkansas
Auburn
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
LSU
Mississippi
Mississippi State
South Carolina
Tennessee
Vanderbilt

Sound good to you?
No, there should be no more than 3 of the 16 from one conference!
Jan 7, 2010 11:27pm
just_a_swimmer's avatar

just_a_swimmer

Senior Member

674 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:28 PM
Thats a catch. Geeze
Jan 7, 2010 11:28pm
E

elbuckeye28

Senior Member

919 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:28 PM
DaBrowns41 wrote:
Non wrote: I think Texas would've won with McCoy

I wanted Alabama to win and thought they were better

but Texas came out loose and full of fight

just the way both teams took the field I think Texas had it tonight but that changed everything
McCoy is nothing special either. Outcome would have been the same. Some of you people overrate McCoy.
For a person who "pretends" to know a lot about football, your posts make me think otherwise. I'm amazed as to how absurd your comments are sometimes.
Jan 7, 2010 11:28pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:29 PM
Alabama was completely off balance on that first defensive series.

Texas was taking it in with ease with McCoy.

Maybe the next possession they get three and it's only 10-0 but still that would've been a better start than 6-0.

Alabama would've still ran the ball and scored but Texas would've continued to add points and keep it real close.

I didn't want Texas to win but I think they were going to win. Just my opinion.

I wouldn't say that it didn't matter, Alabama would've won anyway. It's football and injuries happen but no way can you say that Alabama would've won either way.
Jan 7, 2010 11:29pm
september63's avatar

september63

Senior Member

5,789 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:31 PM
Mack Brown!! Open ur offense and let the kid throw downfield!
Jan 7, 2010 11:31pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:32 PM
still not over yet

8 minutes left
Jan 7, 2010 11:32pm
D

DaBrowns41

Senior Member

1,304 posts
Jan 7, 2010 11:33 PM
elbuckeye28 wrote:
DaBrowns41 wrote:
Non wrote: I think Texas would've won with McCoy

I wanted Alabama to win and thought they were better

but Texas came out loose and full of fight

just the way both teams took the field I think Texas had it tonight but that changed everything
McCoy is nothing special either. Outcome would have been the same. Some of you people overrate McCoy.
For a person who "pretends" to know a lot about football, your posts make me think otherwise. I'm amazed as to how absurd your comments are sometimes.
My comments are absurd because I don't think a QB is that special considering he can't beat any teams with decent defenses?

My fault for looking at the facts.
Jan 7, 2010 11:33pm