jmog;750619 wrote:He did make it a perfect and happy place, humans screwed it up.
You missed the point. I wouldn't have made my world where humans could screw it up. What was the point?
jmog;750619 wrote:He did make it a perfect and happy place, humans screwed it up.
No a perfect metaphor would be God gave you AIDS.jmog;750628 wrote:So, if you have AIDS and I have developed the cure. I hand you the cure for free but you push me away and reject my cure for whatever reason and you end up dying. How would I be the "dick"?
That is a perfect metaphor for what God did. If you believe the Bible we are all headed to hell anyway and he provided a way out to save us. He isn't the "dick" if we reject him, we are.
VOTE: Webfire for God!!!!!!WebFire;750651 wrote:You missed the point. I wouldn't have made my world where humans could screw it up.
WebFire;750651 wrote:You missed the point. I wouldn't have made my world where humans could screw it up. What was the point?
I Wear Pants;750688 wrote:No a perfect metaphor would be God gave you AIDS.
God created sin.jmog;750737 wrote:No, God did not force us to sin, we chose to sin. Your version of God giving us AIDS only fits if God forces us to sin, which is not the case.
I Wear Pants;750739 wrote:God created sin.
jmog;750757 wrote:No, actually, he didn't. God, if you believe the Bible, is 100% holy and is incapable of creating something like sin that is the exact opposite of his "being".
Depending on what you believe came first, it was either Lucifer's free will or humans' free will that created sin. They used their God given free will to go against God.
jmog;750735 wrote:So you would have created robots who are forced to serve you because that's how they are programmed by you?
Thread Bomber;750723 wrote:VOTE: Webfire for God!!!!!!
I want chickens with 4 wings and a pot plant in every pot!
Actually I think one of those descriptions or maybe even something else fits. You have to realize that the definition of ignorant is not as we typically use it. It is un-informed, so yes, if someone doesn't happen to believe in the Bible they either have completely understood it and rejected it (falls into the bad, evil, rebellious category) or they have never heard/understood and fall into the ignorant/blind category.I Wear Pants;750771 wrote:Would you agree that someone doesn't have to be evil, bad, stupid, blind, ignorant, etc to not believe in the Bible or God?
WebFire;750779 wrote:Uh, ya. Why would you purposely build a being with the ability to go against you, when your wish is for them to follow you?
The idea that God created the world as it is because he desperately wanted someone to love him doesn't really jive with me.jmog;750792 wrote:Its more fulfilling to have someone love you because they want to love you instead of because they have no choice.
Look at arranged/forced marriage vs a modern typical marriage. Its more fulfilling for someone to fall in love with you than to be forced to marry you.
1. Actually by definition not believing it to be true is rejecting it.I Wear Pants;750794 wrote:Or they feel that it isn't true. One can both completely understand the Bible and believe that it isn't true without rejecting the ideas within. It's entirely possible to think that it'd be great if what is in the Bible were true but truly believe it not to be.
You can not believe in God without "rejecting" God.
That's ignoring the obvious scenario of say some remote African villigers or something that haven't ever even heard of Christianity. How is it just for them to be eternally damned when they had not even the possibility of being Christian?
jmog;750800 wrote:1. Actually by definition not believing it to be true is rejecting it.
2. I've covered the "remote African villager" aspect before on this site. Many Christians believe they would be under the same "judgement" as those during the OT times before Jesus in that they would be "weighed" by their actions/moral character. I honestly can not say for sure, and neither can any Christian, how that scenario plays out.
Actually, I'm on pretty good behavior on this one. I usually roll down a much different pathCenterBHSFan;750803 wrote:You know... this thread started off very good and interesting. Lots of good reading in the beginning.
But just like all other threads about anything pertaining to this subject it has degenerated into people posting the most petulant, belligerent and anger-harvesting posts.
SMH
jmog;750735 wrote:So you would have created robots who are forced to serve you because that's how they are programmed by you?