FatHobbit;722632 wrote:I thought he was a douche who wanted to charge $12 for the internets.
That's what I was thinking too. Is he going to start charging Calipari in order to be able to talk?
FatHobbit;722632 wrote:I thought he was a douche who wanted to charge $12 for the internets.
LJ;722625 wrote:Who's JJ?
LJ;722625 wrote:Who's JJ?
Tiernan;722647 wrote:^^^
Typo on the double J dickless - (although his brother was JJ Sully)
LJ;722648 wrote:So you were trying to type "J and company"?
J & Crew...as in...oh hell you'd never get it anyway.LJ;722648 wrote:So you were trying to type "J and company"?
SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURE
admit that you fucked up and are just as dumb as the rest of us morons here.
Tiernan;722657 wrote:J & Crew...as in...oh hell you'd never get it anyway.
Skyhook79;722541 wrote:Kentucky Fire Marshalls must not be doing their jobs.
Fly4Fun;722010 wrote:Response to what? I said what I wanted to say and that's that. You generally do a pretty good job of coming up with excuses. Kansas lost to Texas because they cried all night and skipped breakfast. OSU beat Florida and FSU on their home court while they were bad teams. Excuses are your thing, it's cool.
Fly4Fun;722742 wrote:No, it makes perfect sense. I'm sorry that you don't understand. You're an excuse maker. You make excuses for why Kansas L's don't really count and why Ohio State's W's aren't really that good.
You make excuses. it's that simple.
But I'm probably not going to respond to you again as I was up all night crying and skipped breakfast so I'm out of it.
SportsAndLady;722774 wrote:Lol how is saying Ohio State's W's aren't really that good an excuse? Lol MORON
For the record, I never said Ohio State's W's aren't that good, nor have I ever said Kansas' L's don't count...there's a reason there's a thread dedicated to your terrible moderatoring, and that's because you are a fucking moron.
Fly4Fun;722791 wrote:Ya, lets point to a thread started by trolls in the Basement as a realistic view on life... you're logical argumentative skills are astounding.
Fly4Fun;722742 wrote:and why Ohio State's W's aren't really that good.
I didn't say Kansas' L's don't count, moron. Go back and read that thread; if you see anywhere I said the loss doesn't count, please post it. All I said was they would not have lost that game if they were not up all night crying with a teammate. AND I WAS RIGHT; BECAUSE KANSAS BEAT TEXAS BY DOUBLE DIGITS ON A NEUTRAL COURT IN MARCH. So go ahead, keep bringing up the "up all night" crying excuse, all it does is make me right...because that really was the reason why KU lost.Fly4Fun;722742 wrote:You make excuses for why Kansas L's don't really count
Fly4Fun;722863 wrote:Once again, you were trying to discount both the FSU and Florida wins because they are 1000 times better now supposedly. Just like you made excuses when Kansas lost to Texas. This is very simple... you make excuses to try to discredit when teams win.
Just accept what happened. OSU beat both Florida and FSU on their homecourt, and Kansas lost to Texas on their hc. There is no need to try to explain away things that happened. They happened so deal with it.
SportsAndLady;722890 wrote:ANYTHING NOR AM I BASHING OSU IN ANYWAY, SHAPE, OR FORM.
SportsAndLady;722890 wrote:Just because you played a SS team in November doesn't make the victory a very good one.
define bashing please. lolSportsAndLady;722890 wrote:just like FSU was an average team when OSU played them.
Sounds like you just did brag about their OOC schedule.SportsAndLady;722890 wrote:Do you see me bragging about KU's OOC schedule? No, because it wasn't that good...however, looking back at it, it was actually pretty good.
You just said they were pretty good...SportsAndLady;722890 wrote:But that doesn't make KU's victories over Michigan, UCLA, and USC really good. Those were all average teams when KU played them,
Lol again. They played twice and split. That doesn't mean it was because they were up all night crying like babies the first time.SportsAndLady;722890 wrote:And enough with the UT thing...if anything, I look right and you all look wrong.
When did I bash OSU in any of those? Just because I point out one game on their schedule being a decent victory and not a really good one, doesn't mean I'm bashing. Have some thicker skin OSU fans.FatHobbit;722899 wrote:define bashing please. lol
I'm saying in the past. You didn't see me saying "KU's OOC was really good!" because that simply would not be true. Just like OSU's OOC schedule was not good. Because at the time, those teams (FSU, UF, Mich, UCLA, USC, etc.) were not playing as well as they are currently.FatHobbit;722899 wrote:Sounds like you just did brag about their OOC schedule.
I just hate when people say "oh that ________ win sure looks good now!" It's not logical. That team was not playing well at that time in the season, so you didn't beat a good team you beat a struggling team with potential, that you will later see.FatHobbit;722899 wrote:You just said they were pretty good...
FatHobbit;722899 wrote:Lol again. They played twice and split. That doesn't mean it was because they were up all night crying like babies the first time.
I guess I see what you're saying, but IMHO more often than not those teams are underrated early. Pollsters or whoever did not realize how good they were at the time but by the end of the season it's more obvious.SportsAndLady;722910 wrote:I just hate when people say "oh that ________ win sure looks good now!" It's not logical. That team was not playing well at that time in the season, so you didn't beat a good team you beat a struggling team with potential, that you will later see.
I'll admit it could be true, but you act like it has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.SportsAndLady;722910 wrote:As a fan, I am allowed to say it was because of it. How else do you explain it? KU was undefeated at the time, they had won 69 straight games in AFH, and they were playing very well. They would not lose to UT if she did not die...just my opinion. You don't like it/don't agree with it? Okay. But that doesn't mean it still can't be true.
SportsAndLady;722910 wrote:Oh and "crying like babies"??? Their best friend's mom just died. And you're gonna say crying like babies? Question for you...has anyone really close to you ever died?
Pollsters' jobs are to rank the teams based off performance, not their potential, not how good they CAN be. Florida State did not have a quality win until Baylor; did you want them to be in the top 25 as a 9-4 team with no quality victories? They weren't underrated, they just didn't hit their potential until the end of the season.FatHobbit;722919 wrote:I guess I see what you're saying, but IMHO more often than not those teams are underrated early. Pollsters or whoever did not realize how good they were at the time but by the end of the season it's more obvious.
And I admit that it's coming off that way, but really all I'm saying is that is what I think, not what actually happened. Now, in my mind, yes UT beat Kansas in Lawrence because of the death. Just my opinion..that I feel very strongly about. And when you look at it--it makes sense with their home winning streak and then DRILLING UT on a neutral court. I'm not trying to act like it's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, just that I think that is what happened. If you don't agree with it...no harm no foul.FatHobbit;722919 wrote:I'll admit it could be true, but you act like it has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
FatHobbit;722919 wrote:Ok, that was a little low, but it's not like all of their mom's died. I have had people close to me die and I've had friend's lose people close to them. It's not the same.
SportsAndLady;722937 wrote:Pollsters' jobs are to rank the teams based off performance, not their potential, not how good they CAN be. Florida State did not have a quality win until Baylor; did you want them to be in the top 25 as a 9-4 team with no quality victories? They weren't underrated, they just didn't hit their potential until the end of the season.
SportsAndLady;722937 wrote:And I admit that it's coming off that way, but really all I'm saying is that is what I think, not what actually happened. Now, in my mind, yes UT beat Kansas in Lawrence because of the death. Just my opinion..that I feel very strongly about. And when you look at it--it makes sense with their home winning streak and then DRILLING UT on a neutral court. I'm not trying to act like it's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, just that I think that is what happened. If you don't agree with it...no harm no foul.
SportsAndLady;722937 wrote:That is ignorance. Do you know why that is ignorance? Because you do not know how close Kansas players are to each other. They are not just teammates, not just friends..they consider each other family. The Kansas tree is a very closely connected family, they are not just friends. Hell, the Morrii and TRob end most of their twitter posts with "F.O.E."--their team slogan...which stands for "family over everything"
FatHobbit;722952 wrote:Lots of people say lots of shit. I don't believe all of them were that affected by one player losing their mom regardless of what their team slogan is. But I also know shit about Kansas and don't want to argue. I can agree to disagree.
ccrunner609;723053 wrote:Then why does everyone rush the court when they beat them or make fake champions t-shirts? Its because Duke is the gold standard for basketball now. And dont act like EVERY team doesnt do that.