Pomeroy Rankings

Home Archive College Sports Pomeroy Rankings
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Mar 12, 2011 9:46 PM
How do you feel about Pomeroy as a tool for ranking teams? Many people feel they are more accurate than the RPI and should be used in evaluating NCAA tournament teams. I was just wondering what the people here think of them.
Mar 12, 2011 9:46pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Mar 12, 2011 9:47 PM
Is Ohio State #1?
Mar 12, 2011 9:47pm
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Mar 12, 2011 9:48 PM
Yes
Mar 12, 2011 9:48pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Mar 12, 2011 9:49 PM
Then it must be doing something right. I'm for it.
Mar 12, 2011 9:49pm
Azubuike24's avatar

Azubuike24

Senior Member

15,933 posts
Mar 12, 2011 10:11 PM
I think they are great because they factor in so much information. However, I think they overrate some of the mid-majors. So, technically they are good at ranking a team's "profile or resume", but actually put some of these teams on the court and they aren't as high as KP has them. For example:

16 Utah St.
19 Belmont
25 George Mason

or

51 Colorado
55 Tennessee
92 Memphis

Now, you could put these 6 teams together and there would be almost no difference at all. In fact, Belmont lost to Tennessee twice this year already. Memphis just won C-USA. Colorado just beat one of the hottest teams in the country and hung with #1 Kansas for a good amount of Friday's game.
Mar 12, 2011 10:11pm
swamisez's avatar

swamisez

Senior Member

1,990 posts
Mar 13, 2011 12:08 AM
Love kenpom. Has had the national champion listed pre tournment every year since 04 I think. Great mathematical analysis. Had duke on top last year and was derided. The formula seems pretty accurate.
Mar 13, 2011 12:08am
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Mar 13, 2011 6:11 AM
Azubuike24;709597 wrote:I think they are great because they factor in so much information. However, I think they overrate some of the mid-majors. So, technically they are good at ranking a team's "profile or resume", but actually put some of these teams on the court and they aren't as high as KP has them. For example:

16 Utah St.
19 Belmont
25 George Mason

or

51 Colorado
55 Tennessee
92 Memphis

Now, you could put these 6 teams together and there would be almost no difference at all. In fact, Belmont lost to Tennessee twice this year already. Memphis just won C-USA. Colorado just beat one of the hottest teams in the country and hung with #1 Kansas for a good amount of Friday's game.

Maybe because it includes efficiency ratings it favors mid majors because it is easier to be efficient against bad teams. I don't know. That's really the only issue I have with it. It's definitely more comprehensive than RPI. Of course, I am biased as Pomeroy's rankings have Ohio State #1 team in the country, the Big Ten the #1 conference in the country, and says the Big Ten has 11 of the top 83 teams in the country.
Mar 13, 2011 6:11am
D

dokken

Senior Member

230 posts
Mar 13, 2011 5:43 PM
Is this some guy ranking teams smoking the Meigs Gold down in Pomeroy, Ohio?
Mar 13, 2011 5:43pm