2011 Big East Tournament

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ 2011 Big East Tournament
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Mar 9, 2011 5:33 PM
[video=youtube;nsBV0S5ynu0][/video]
Mar 9, 2011 5:33pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Mar 9, 2011 5:36 PM
So first the horn sounds while shooting a free throw, then there was possibly a missed foul on the attempted catch, then the St Johns player takes 3 steps with the ball (2 of which were while he was out of bounds) with 1.7 seconds left, then he chucks the ball into the rafters. The refs do nothing and run back to the tunnel. SMH.
Mar 9, 2011 5:36pm
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Mar 9, 2011 5:38 PM
karen lotz;705431 wrote:[video=youtube;nsBV0S5ynu0][/video]

That was just pathetic.
Mar 9, 2011 5:38pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Mar 9, 2011 6:20 PM
That is absolutely one of the worst no-calls(probably the worst) I have ever seen.

The Big East should be ashamed of themselves.
Mar 9, 2011 6:20pm
KR1245's avatar

KR1245

Senior Member

4,317 posts
Mar 9, 2011 6:24 PM
How do you miss that call?

Thats awful
Mar 9, 2011 6:24pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Mar 9, 2011 6:26 PM
They miss an obvious foul, travel and out of bounds. Unbelievable.
Mar 9, 2011 6:26pm
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Mar 9, 2011 6:27 PM
That was shameful.

Can't wait for 'Cuse-Johnnies tomorrow afternoon.
Mar 9, 2011 6:27pm
dhs22p's avatar

dhs22p

Senior Member

431 posts
Mar 9, 2011 6:38 PM
wildcats20;705479 wrote:They miss an obvious foul, travel and out of bounds. Unbelievable.

Thats 3 calls in 4.9 seconds. 1 I can understand but not 3. Also before this decacle there was a foul when Rutgers drived to the hoop. I second the notion that this is the worst call ive ever seen.
Mar 9, 2011 6:38pm
KR1245's avatar

KR1245

Senior Member

4,317 posts
Mar 9, 2011 6:43 PM
They just said on SC that the play couldnt be reviewed because the refs didnt make a call.

Didnt that happen a few weeks ago in the Louisville vs Pitt game? The ref didnt make a call after the cheerleader tossed the ball in the ball, it wasnt until after the refs went back and saw that there was time on the clock that they called a tech. I might be wrong
Mar 9, 2011 6:43pm
D

dave

Senior Member

4,558 posts
Mar 9, 2011 6:53 PM
KR1245;705494 wrote:They just said on SC that the play couldnt be reviewed because the refs didnt make a call.

Didnt that happen a few weeks ago in the Louisville vs Pitt game? The ref didnt make a call after the cheerleader tossed the ball in the ball, it wasnt until after the refs went back and saw that there was time on the clock that they called a tech. I might be wrong

I believe they can't review it because there was no whistle. In the Louisville game there was a whistle just not for the cheerleader, so they can review all aspects of the play even though they weren't actually looking for the tech.
Mar 9, 2011 6:53pm
september63's avatar

september63

Senior Member

5,789 posts
Mar 9, 2011 6:57 PM
Should have been Rutgers at the line for 2 FT's, then Rutgers ball out of bounds with 1.7 secs.
Mar 9, 2011 6:57pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Mar 9, 2011 7:07 PM
september63;705507 wrote:Should have been Rutgers at the line for 2 FT's, then Rutgers ball out of bounds with 1.7 secs.

No.

If they call the foul(not sure of the foul situation) and Rutgers was in the double bonus, then yes 2 FTs. If they DON'T call the foul, it's Rutgers ball on the side with 1.7.
Mar 9, 2011 7:07pm
Jughead's avatar

Jughead

Senior Member

1,261 posts
Mar 9, 2011 7:10 PM
killer_ewok;705481 wrote:That was shameful.

Can't wait for 'Cuse-Johnnies tomorrow afternoon.

It appears this trio of officials couldn't wait for that game either.

Loss of pay for the game and a very long suspension should be a guaranteed thing, because they rigged the outcome of a game.
Mar 9, 2011 7:10pm
reclegend22's avatar

reclegend22

Cool Hand Luke

8,772 posts
Mar 9, 2011 7:41 PM
Jim Burr is one of the worst officials in all of sport. An absolute embarrassment that this cadaver is still refereeing games, especially at such a high level. I am in no means a fan of either team and this particular series of events left me unabated in anger. Appalling.

My God, someone please start FireJimBurr.com and get this corpse and his accomplices fired from big time basketball. After this, they shouldn't be judging a finger paint contest.
Mar 9, 2011 7:41pm
Tiger2003's avatar

Tiger2003

Kill or be Killed

15,421 posts
Mar 9, 2011 7:42 PM
I understand how the foul was not called but not the out of bounds. Horrible job
Mar 9, 2011 7:42pm
D

dave

Senior Member

4,558 posts
Mar 9, 2011 7:50 PM
wildcats20;705517 wrote:No.

If they call the foul(not sure of the foul situation) and Rutgers was in the double bonus, then yes 2 FTs. If they DON'T call the foul, it's Rutgers ball on the side with 1.7.

Yes, it should have been. 2 technical free throws and Rutgers ball.
Mar 9, 2011 7:50pm
D

dave

Senior Member

4,558 posts
Mar 9, 2011 7:51 PM
UC playing like shit, Cash needs to wake the fck up.
Mar 9, 2011 7:51pm
P

Prescott

Senior Member

2,569 posts
Mar 9, 2011 7:53 PM
Yes, it should have been. 2 technical free throws and Rutgers ball.
Delay of game warning?????? No tech.
Mar 9, 2011 7:53pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Mar 9, 2011 7:54 PM
dave;705565 wrote:Yes, it should have been. 2 technical free throws and Rutgers ball.

Wrong.

The head of referees even came out and said no T was warranted.
Mar 9, 2011 7:54pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Mar 9, 2011 8:10 PM
wildcats20;705571 wrote:Wrong.

The head of referees even came out and said no T was warranted.
"There is no penalty for exuberance if the kid thought it was the end of the game," Adams said. "It's his ball and he's not delaying anything. Also the coaches are walking toward each other. There was a presumption that the game was over but unfortunately it doesn't sound like it was."
..
Mar 9, 2011 8:10pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Mar 9, 2011 8:14 PM
Prescott;705569 wrote:Delay of game warning?????? No tech.

Wouldn't have even been a delay of game warning.

The clock was STILL running. If I want to throw the ball up as high as I want with time still on the clock, I am 100% allowed.

It happened not that long ago where a player was going out of bounds and instead of throwing the ball back onto the court of play, he threw it straight up in the air to let the clock expire.
Mar 9, 2011 8:14pm
R

revgat

Member

94 posts
Mar 9, 2011 9:03 PM
As it was called, the clock was running. How it should have been called though was to stop the clock when he went out of bounds. Then it would have been a delay of game warning.
Mar 9, 2011 9:03pm
Leonardo's avatar

Leonardo

Senior Member

4,986 posts
Mar 9, 2011 9:04 PM
Tuesday:
Game 1: (9) Connecticut def. (16) DePaul, 97-71
Game 2: (13) Rutgers def. (12) Seton Hall, 76-70 in OT
Game 3: (15) South Florida def. (10) Villanova, 70-69
Game 4: (11) Marquette def. (14) Providence, 87-66

Wednesday:
Game 5: (9) Connecticut def. (8) Georgetown, 79-62
Game 6: (5) St. John's def. (13) Rutgers, 65-63
Game 7: (7) Cincinnati def. (15) South Florida, 87-61
Game 8: (6) West Virginia vs. (11) Marquette, 9:30 PM

Thursday:
Game 9: (1) Pittsburgh vs. (9) Connecticut, 12 PM
Game 10: (4) Syracuse vs. (5) St. John's, 2:30 PM
Game 11: (2) Notre Dame vs. (7) Cincinnati, 7 PM
Game 12: (3) Louisville vs. Game 8 winner, 9:30 PM

Friday:
Game 13: Game 9 winner vs. Game 10 winner, 7 PM
Game 14: Game 11 winner vs. Game 12 winner, 9 PM

Saturday:
Game 15: Game 13 winner vs. Game 14 winner, 9 PM
Mar 9, 2011 9:04pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Mar 9, 2011 9:04 PM
revgat;705686 wrote:As it was called, the clock was running. How it should have been called though was to stop the clock when he went out of bounds. Then it would have been a delay of game warning.

IF the whistle blows, I highly doubt he throws the ball. Even if he does, it would have been a warning.

The whistle SHOULD have blown on the foul. Therefore the travel and him going out of bounds would never have happened.


And it really doesn't matter how it SHOULD have been called, it wasn't called that way. It was called as nothing and the clock was still running, hence why no T OR warning was given for throwing the ball up in the air
Mar 9, 2011 9:04pm