karen lotz;700218 wrote:Well if you want to go along with what he was saying, they were playing the Knicks, who people do care about.
and they showed cavs highlights. not the knicks
karen lotz;700218 wrote:Well if you want to go along with what he was saying, they were playing the Knicks, who people do care about.
thedynasty1998;700849 wrote:The original complaint was about Sportscenter not showing highlights of them in a game they lost. That was my point. Why show highlights of a team with little interest nationwide in a game they lost.
If the Cavs were in contention for a playoff spot, yes, they would be on Sportscenter more.
KR1245;700854 wrote:I understand what you're saying. Although this seems to happen whether they win or lose. Did you see the highlights from the Knicks game a few weeks ago? You would have thought the Knicks won the game by 20 points. Cavs won the game and they literally showed one Cavs highlight.
There are people outside the state of Ohio who like the Cavs that probably wouldnt mind seeing more Cavs highlights on SC.
KR1245;700854 wrote:
There are people outside the state of Ohio who like the Cavs that probably wouldnt mind seeing more Cavs highlights on SC.
like_that;700901 wrote:When I noticed this thread was at the top of the page, I knew that a idiotic troll argument was started and the idiotic troll side of the argument was taken by one or more of the following idiots: dynasty, lotz, or turdo.
I wasn't surprised to find out that I was pretty much spot on.
thedynasty1998;700950 wrote:What was the idiotic troll side of the argument?
like_that;700959 wrote:Just search every post you ever made on a Cleveland thread, and you will figure it out. Actually, probably not, because you are too dense to understand anything.
Pick6;701954 wrote:Dynasty's logic is proven flawed again. Cavs lost and there was still highlights of them.
Pick6;701954 wrote:Dynasty's logic is proven flawed again. Cavs lost and there was still highlights of them.