ccrunner609;662689 wrote:So what you are saying is that you would do Snooki before Kesha?

No, I'd let Snooki give me head before I'd do anything within a 79 mile radius of Kesha.

I don't know...I'd do nasty nasty things to Holly Madison, and her little assistant chick that got the boob job.

Madonna...knows things. But I'm always leery of the 50+ hotties. Make-up and botox can do wonders for the face, but not much can be done to hide the skin aging on the rest of the body.

I would never touch Snooki. Most of these girls are just as dirty and likely to have some sort of STD. To me Miley is the hottest of the bunch and "safest" pick. I haven't paid much attention to Lohan lately, but if she can still clean up nice she's at least the one of this bunch to fantasize about.

Doh! How did I forget Holly Madison? Dirty, and the whole old man Hef thing is just creepy. But Lohan in her day (or in the photo in the OP) is still hotter.

rydawg5;662601 wrote:Why do married men make these polls?

Because I love vagina. And I love women. And women have vaginas.

That is a retarded question. You show up like once every 6 months and you ask a retarded question like that?

I seriously don't know why everyone thinks Khloe Kardashian is so fat. She isn't. She is obviously bigger than her sisters but she is not huge.

Fab, these guys on here are pretty picky when it comes to their fantasies. I think we should take their pics and send them to the 10 women listed and see how they respond.

power i;662967 wrote:Fab, these guys on here are pretty picky when it comes to their fantasies. I think we should take their pics and send them to the 10 women listed and see how they respond.

Lol, I don't think pics would do their responses justice.

power i;662967 wrote:Fab, these guys on here are pretty picky when it comes to their fantasies. I think we should take their pics and send them to the 10 women listed and see how they respond.

Typically yes, guys on here are like that, but with the list provided, I'd be scared that over half of that list is not "clean" and if I were single I'd be scared to be with them STD wise.

Fab4Runner;662948 wrote:I seriously don't know why everyone thinks Khloe Kardashian is so fat. She isn't. She is obviously bigger than her sisters but she is not huge.

I am confident guy, who wants to please the woman. No way I touch Khloe, cause aint no way I can stack up with Lamar

I'm not picky. I openly said I'd do all of them.

In order to do SnotBubbles, women must meet the following criteria:
- Have a vagina.
- Have somewhat of an attractive face.
- Weigh less than 170 lbs (height could alter this criteria).
- Not be retarded. And I just mean, thump your hand on your chest and drool retarded. Partially retarded, I'm cool with.

If the chick is hot and far surpasses all of this criteria, "woot" for me. It would feel about as exciting as finding an extra hamburger put into your happy meal. Good deal, but I didn't need it.

I would hit them all several times. I would even invite friends over to watch me do them. I have always wanted to do a famous chic and thought the only chance i had was anna nicole smith now that she is dead i think i have no chances in hell now.

Chloe Kardashian is absolutely hideous - and crude can be hot for some girls (usually if they are hot) but it doesn't remotely work for her. If Seinfeld ever did a "man face" episode (I think they did), she'd be perfect for it!

I just think its scary that Kesha is only 23 and she doesn't look much younger than present-day Madonna.

gut;663550 wrote:Chloe Kardashian is absolutely hideous - and crude can be hot for some girls (usually if they are hot) but it doesn't remotely work for her. If Seinfeld ever did a "man face" episode (I think they did), she'd be perfect for it!

She looks like Hagrid in that pic.

FatHobbit;663637 wrote:She looks like Hagrid in that pic.

That's what she really looks like naturally in an untouched photo. I saw them together on the Tonight Show a while back and she was even more breathtakingly ugly. Words like "beastly" and "sasquatch" spring to mind. She has a chin that looks like someone took a shovel to. Seriously. I'd heard of Chloe but don't think I'd ever seen her. Remember thinking "yikes, that sister really got the short-end of the gene pool"

gut;663734 wrote:That's what she really looks like naturally in an untouched photo. I saw them together on the Tonight Show a while back and she was even more breathtakingly ugly. Words like "beastly" and "sasquatch" spring to mind. She has a chin that looks like someone took a shovel to. Seriously. I'd heard of Chloe but don't think I'd ever seen her. Remember thinking "yikes, that sister really got the short-end of the gene pool"

It's Khloe. And if she is hideous then at least 50% of the population is ridiculously, horribly, disgustingly hideous.

Fab4Runner;663768 wrote:It's Khloe. And if she is hideous then at least 50% of the population is ridiculously, horribly, disgustingly hideous.

Not hideous, if you like sasquatch's that look like pre-op transexuals...Kind of a lighter-skinned, thicker brunette version of JWow...But no uglier than anyone else who's been hit by a shovel.