LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 20, 2011 6:35pm
Big Gain;645894 wrote:Duke has won 2 National Titles since 2001 Yes
Kansas has won 2 National Titles since 1998 Yes
Kentucky has won 2 National Titles since 1996 Yes
AND
Florida has won 2 national Titles since 2006 Nah
North Carolina has won 2 National Titles since 1999 Yes
UCONN has won 2 National Titles since 1999 Nah
UCLA won a National Title in 1995 and has won 4 more than any other school in history. Yes
Therefore, "top eschelon"?
...
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 20, 2011 6:38pm
The top echelon schools are the Blue Bloods of college basketball, like LJ highlighted.
Carolina, UCLA, Kansas, Kentucky, and Duke.
Carolina, UCLA, Kansas, Kentucky, and Duke.
Jester
Posts: 700
Jan 20, 2011 7:32pm
Are you asking me if I consider those teams to be at the top of college basketball as well? If so:Big Gain;645894 wrote:Duke has won 2 National Titles since 2001
Kansas has won 2 National Titles since 1998
Kentucky has won 2 National Titles since 1996
AND
Florida has won 2 National Titles since 2006
North Carolina has won 2 National Titles since 1999
UCONN has won 2 National Titles since 1999
UCLA won a National Title in 1995 and has won 4 more than any other school in history.
Therefore, "top eschelon"?
Why the fuck are you asking me? Did you even read the article that was being referred to? I didn't come up with those teams, the author of the article did. If you have a problem with who is and is not considered at the top of college basketball, go tell that dude.
Jester
Posts: 700
Jan 20, 2011 7:34pm
CinciX12;645878 wrote:Definitely not just you lol. I think we should buy them all christmas presents.
Darn, I forgot to do that. I guess i'm a bad TEAMmate. :rolleyes:
I wonder what Big Gain is getting Diebler and Matta for Valentines Day?
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jan 20, 2011 7:55pm
Dudette, you think WAY to highly of yourself, I just connected the post to yours since you were the one that posted those 3 teams as the "top eschelon".
Why the "fuck" to you use the ignorant ugly word "fuck" so often?? An inferiority complex is what most Doctors of Psychology would say.
Why the "fuck" to you use the ignorant ugly word "fuck" so often?? An inferiority complex is what most Doctors of Psychology would say.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jan 20, 2011 7:58pm
Jester;645954 wrote:Darn, I forgot to do that. I guess i'm a bad TEAMmate. :rolleyes:
I wonder what Big Gain is getting Diebler and Matta for Valentines Day?
Another inferiorty complex issue? Did you always get the fewest valentines in grade school?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 20, 2011 7:59pm
Big Gain;645972 wrote:Dudette, you think WAY to highly of yourself, I just connected the post to yours since you were the one that posted those 3 teams as the "top eschelon".
Why the "fuck" to you use the ignorant ugly word "fuck" so often?? An inferiority complex is what most Doctors of Psychology would say.
actually, no, they wouldn't, but you are the one who exhibits symptoms
Rudeness: On the other hand, they may also be outspoken, to an extent that is rude. This stems from the constant desire to prove to themselves or others, that they too, are capable of doing all those things that the other is doing.
Extreme Sensitivity: Persons who have an inferiority complex exhibit extreme sensitivity to compliments and criticism. If it is a compliment, they question its genuineness, and if it is criticism, they go on the defense immediately. They do not respond to light humor too well. Also, even if you happen to make a passing comment, they may take it personally.
UNHEALTHY COMPETITION - You really don't love competing with others but if you do, you'll find all ways on how you can outdo your competition. Because if you loose, then you'll feel that you aren't that good enough and you will instill in your mind not compete with anyone for you will never win at all. You envy those who are always on top of everything and you feel you will never be like that even in your wildest dreams.
Jester
Posts: 700
Jan 20, 2011 8:05pm
First off. I'm a dude, not a dudette. Are you calling me a woman? How mature.Big Gain;645972 wrote:Dudette, you think WAY to highly of yourself, I just connected the post to yours since you were the one that posted those 3 teams as the "top eschelon".
Why the "fuck" to you use the ignorant ugly word "fuck" so often?? An inferiority complex is what most Doctors of Psychology would say.
Second thing. Coming from you, the part in bold seriously makes me LOL.
And no, you did not simply "connect the post" to mine. On your last post on the matter, you ended it with "Therefore, "top eschelon?". A question mark implies you were asking a question on whether those teams you listed should be considered at the top as well.
And why do I use that word? Um, because I can. It has nothing to do with an "inferiority complex" or whatever else you come up with.
Jester
Posts: 700
Jan 20, 2011 8:07pm
Nope. Dem hoes were all over me.Big Gain;645977 wrote:Another inferiorty complex issue? Did you always get the fewest valentines in grade school?
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jan 20, 2011 8:22pm
Rudeness? Pointing out lies and misquotes? You don't support ones First Amendment rights?
Extreme Sensivity? Presumptious of you to claim you can see through cyberspace to invision sensitivity in others.
UNHEALTHY COMPETITION? I have competed agaisnt world class individuals in my chosen competative endeavour, one with a stringent code of ethics.
Extreme Sensivity? Presumptious of you to claim you can see through cyberspace to invision sensitivity in others.
UNHEALTHY COMPETITION? I have competed agaisnt world class individuals in my chosen competative endeavour, one with a stringent code of ethics.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 20, 2011 8:26pm
You are always calling other's names.Big Gain;646001 wrote:Rudeness? Pointing out lies and misquotes? You don't support ones First Amendment rights?
Seeing as how you have to attack everyone that posts on threads you are on.....Extreme Sensivity? Presumptious of you to claim you can see through cyberspace to invision sensitivity of others.
.......rightUNHEALTHY COMPETITION? I have competed agaisnt world class individuals in my chosen competative endeavour, one with a stringent code of ethics.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jan 20, 2011 8:39pm
You think "dude" is a mature manner of addressing an individual?? You proved yourself to be a teenager, my point.
I was hoping to tickle your fancy, thanks for playin.
Once again you think way too highly of yourself. The question posed was in general, to anyone interested in considering the assumtions. If I only wanted your opinion I would have prefaced the querry "jester".
I was hoping to tickle your fancy, thanks for playin.
Once again you think way too highly of yourself. The question posed was in general, to anyone interested in considering the assumtions. If I only wanted your opinion I would have prefaced the querry "jester".
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jan 20, 2011 8:42pm
LJ;646005 wrote:You are always calling other's names."always" ? that's a lie.[quote/]
Seeing as how you have to attack everyone that posts on threads you are on....THE TRUTH."everyone"? that's a loe
.......right
Jester
Posts: 700
Jan 20, 2011 8:45pm
Nope, not a teenager. Nice FAIL.Big Gain;646032 wrote:You think "dude" is a mature manner of addressing an individual?? You proved yourself to be a teenager, my point.
I was hoping to tickle your fancy, thanks for playin.
Once again you think way too highly of yourself. The question posed was in general, to anyone interested in considering the assumtions. If I only wanted your opinion I would have prefaced the querry "jester".
Tickle my fancy? That is quite possibly the gayest thing i've ever read on here, which is saying a lot. I'm sorry to disappoint you, but you will not be tickling me in any way, shape, or form.
And if you were just stating it in general, then why quote me? Why not just post the information without quoting my post? When quoting someone on an internet forum, you eliminate the need to call out said poster by their name in your post. Notice how I did not have to say "Big Gain" at the beginning of my post, because the quote function implies that I am talking directly to you.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jan 20, 2011 8:46pm
wtf is going on here?
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jan 20, 2011 8:48pm
LJ;646005 wrote:You are always calling other's names.
Seeing as how you have to attack everyone that posts on threads you are on.....
.......right
"always" calling other's[sic} names. A lie.
attack "everyone". A lie.
.......right......THE TRUTH.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 20, 2011 8:51pm
Big Gain;646065 wrote:"always" calling other's[sic} names. A lie.
attack "everyone". A lie.
.......right......THE TRUTH.
Inability to accept criticism, another major sign of an inferiority complex.
Man, that is 4 out of the 7 warning signs. Maybe you should seek professional help
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jan 20, 2011 8:59pm
It is MUCH WORSE to act/speak like a teenager if one is a decade or more older.Jester;646054 wrote:Nope, not a teenager. Nice FAIL.
Tickle my fancy? That is quite possibly the gayest thing i've ever read on here, which is saying a lot. I'm sorry to disappoint you, but you will not be tickling me in any way, shape, or form.
And if you were just stating it in general, then why quote me? Why not just post the information without quoting my post? When quoting someone on an internet forum, you eliminate the need to call out said poster by their name in your post. Notice how I did not have to say "Big Gain" at the beginning of my post, because the quote function implies that I am talking directly to you.
The use of the term "gayest" in that sence is more proof of immaturity, since you purport to not being a teenager. I obviously gotcha, thanks for playin.
BTW, "fail" used in that manner is also an inidcator of being a teenager.....OR..... the worse case scenerio of not being a teenager but still using the lingo.
Pay attention, as I said before I connected by post to yours only because your post listed 3 teams as being "top eschelon".
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jan 20, 2011 9:07pm
LJ;646073 wrote:Inability to accept criticism, another major sign of an inferiority complex.
Man, that is 4 out of the 7 warning signs. Maybe you should seek professional help
Pal, your supposed crticisms were lies/exaggerations, thus very unprofessional, even when pretending . You used the words "always" and "everyone". My criticisms are completely accurate, unlike yours.
Jester
Posts: 700
Jan 20, 2011 9:08pm
Teenager? I am not a teenager, you LIAR. I am in my 20's, therefor not a teenager, you LIAR.Big Gain;646089 wrote:It is MUCH WORSE to act/speak like a teenager if one is a decade or more older.
The use of the term "gayest" in that sence is more proof of immaturity, since you purport to not being a teenager. I obviously gotcha, thanks for playin.
BTW, "fail" used in that manner is also an inidcator of being a teenager.....OR..... the worse case scenerio of not being a teenager but still using the lingo.
Pay attention, as I said before I connected by post to yours only because your post listed 3 teams as being "top eschelon".
You know, if you dropped the whole "i'm so much smarter and better than everyone else" attitude, you might be somewhat bearable. This is the internet. Do you realize how many people say things like "gay" or "fail" on here daily? Again, it's the god damn internet. Nobody is talking like this out loud. You act like anyone that does not act or speak like you, is somehow below you. That makes you a douche.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 20, 2011 9:11pm
Big Gain;646106 wrote:Pal, your supposed crticisms were lies/exaggerations, thus very unprofessional, even when pretending . You used the words "always" and "everyone". My criticisms are completely accurate, unlike yours.
Not in touch with reality either I see.
I will pay your co-pay, really I will.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jan 20, 2011 9:22pm
LJ;646114 wrote:Not in touch with reality either I see.
I will pay your co-pay, really I will.
The "reality" is you unprofessionally exaggerated or purposely lied when you said "always" and "everyone".
The most interesting and overriding factor is that those doing the original "criticizing" had a problem with me "critiquing" their "criticisms".
No need for a co-pay, self insured
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 20, 2011 9:28pm
Big Gain;646144 wrote:The "reality" is you unprofessionally exaggerated or purposely lied when you said "always" and "everyone".
The most interesting and overriding factor is that those doing the original "criticizing" had a problem with me "critiquing" their "criticisms".
No need for a co-pay, self insured
So because you are self insured your insurance doesn't carry co-pays? That makes no sense.
You know, everytime I see your screen name I jsut think about
Anyways. you are out of touch with reality, arrogant, and extremely annoying.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jan 20, 2011 10:08pm
You profess your lack of knowledge concerning self insured.
I see you are also unknowledgeable when it comes to Cleveland Browns history. A clue..... the last Browns lineman to play both ways.
Your reality is superficial, "arrogant" is a perception by someone lacking in self-confidence.
I see you are also unknowledgeable when it comes to Cleveland Browns history. A clue..... the last Browns lineman to play both ways.
Your reality is superficial, "arrogant" is a perception by someone lacking in self-confidence.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Jan 20, 2011 10:29pm
LOL @ this entire last page. Paladin is in rare form