shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Dec 4, 2011 12:56pm
agreed. somebody mean, attitude and gets shit done.BR1986FB;1000482 wrote:I want em' mean but I don't want a bunch of cheapshot artists like Suh or James Harrison.
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Dec 4, 2011 12:58pm
suh is heading down albert haynesworth territory.wes_mantooth;1000487 wrote:I wouldn't want Harrison, but man would Suh look good in browns uni
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Dec 4, 2011 1:00pm
shook_17;1000492 wrote:suh is heading down albert haynesworth territory.
Possibly, but much more talented
F
Fabio
Posts: 547
Dec 4, 2011 1:07pm
But he's such a nice guy off the field! :rolleyes:shook_17;1000492 wrote:suh is heading down albert haynesworth territory.
But seriously, Suh still plays with the intensity of a grizzly bear who had a condom full of coke burst inside him. I can't imagine Suh ever taking plays off.
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Dec 4, 2011 1:10pm
^^ im not saying he takes plays off. he has so much talent it is unreal. but if he doesn't straighten up he will never make it to the hall of fame, or anything. he def has some learning to do still but his talent is second to none.
F
Fabio
Posts: 547
Dec 4, 2011 1:19pm
Ah oh ok, I see what you mean then. I've always associated Haynesworth more with "lazy unless contract year" more than anything else.
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Dec 4, 2011 1:25pm
my bad. i was referring it was attitude wise.Fabio;1000550 wrote:Ah oh ok, I see what you mean then. I've always associated Haynesworth more with "lazy unless contract year" more than anything else.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Dec 4, 2011 1:38pm
I'd want a player like suh on the browns, but I think it needs to be noted that he's had a disappointing season. He's avg at best against the run and from what I've read from Scout's Inc Suh is slumping this year.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 4, 2011 1:39pm
His numbers were worse than both Rubin's & Phil Taylor's even though the Lions had more defensive snaps.Commander of Awesome;1000591 wrote:I'd want a player like suh on the browns, but I think it needs to be noted that he's had a disappointing season. He's avg at best against the run and from what I've read from Scout's Inc Suh is slumping this year.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 4, 2011 1:46pm
Does it have to do with Suh being double teamed every play?
Also, I don't see Suh going to Haynesworth territory. He might be an asshole, but he seems pretty passionate, and I can't see him quitting on himself or his team like Haynesworth has done.
Also, I don't see Suh going to Haynesworth territory. He might be an asshole, but he seems pretty passionate, and I can't see him quitting on himself or his team like Haynesworth has done.
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Dec 4, 2011 1:49pm
again, im not talking about suh quitting on his team. im not questioning that, im talking about his dumbass penalties, and his suspension. along with his stupid excuses lol. that is albert territory.like_that;1000606 wrote:Does it have to do with Suh being double teamed every play?
Also, I don't see Suh going to Haynesworth territory. He might be an ****, but he seems pretty passionate, and I can't see him quitting on himself or his team like Haynesworth has done.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 4, 2011 1:51pm
I feel like there has to be a better player to compare him too lol. When I think Haynesworth, I think selfish quitter.shook_17;1000610 wrote:again, im not talking about suh quitting on his team. im not questioning that, im talking about his dumbass penalties, and his suspension. along with his stupid excuses lol. that is albert territory.
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Dec 4, 2011 2:02pm
lol thats what the other guy said. i just figured haynesworth because they both play d tackle. im sure there is a btter comparsion.like_that;1000617 wrote:I feel like there has to be a better player to compare him too lol. When I think Haynesworth, I think selfish quitter.
Z
zach24oz
Posts: 598
Dec 4, 2011 5:28pm
The way Colt is still continuing to play and make bad throws/decisions, go ahead and take Barkley with our first pick if he is there...if not go Blackmon then maybe look at RGIII with the 2nd 1st rounder or take a OL/LB.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Dec 4, 2011 5:44pm
I'm really starting to like rg3. Him or Barkley would me awesome
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Dec 4, 2011 5:46pm
Rg3. This dude is legit as is barkleyCrimson streak;1001234 wrote:I'm really starting to like rg3. Him or Barkley would m awesome
Z
zach24oz
Posts: 598
Dec 4, 2011 5:47pm
So say we are picking 7 or 8 and Blackmon is gone...who do you take RGIII, Barkley, or Floyd or OL/LB?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 4, 2011 6:31pm
Barkley will be LONG gone.zach24oz;1001242 wrote:So say we are picking 7 or 8 and Blackmon is gone...who do you take RGIII, Barkley, or Floyd or OL/LB?
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Dec 4, 2011 6:42pm
No way I take RGIII he would be just as bad in this offense.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Dec 4, 2011 7:35pm
What Matt Williamson was saying on Scouts Inc. was that Suh over pursues and forgets his gap integrity. Nothing to do with double teams.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 4, 2011 8:04pm
At least the falcons lost. That's the one good thing out of this sunday.
Z
zach24oz
Posts: 598
Dec 4, 2011 8:25pm
Who is going to pick Barkley ahead of us? You really think he is a top 5 pick?
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Dec 4, 2011 8:35pm
+1like_that;1001713 wrote:At least the falcons lost. That's the one good thing out of this sunday.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 5, 2011 5:07am
Yeah...both Blackmon & Barkley will be gone. They'll have to trade up to get them. If the draft were today, the Browns would be selecting 9th.zach24oz;1001770 wrote:Who is going to pick Barkley ahead of us? You really think he is a top 5 pick?
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Dec 5, 2011 7:24am
Commander of Awesome;1001595 wrote:What Matt Williamson was saying on Scouts Inc. was that Suh over pursues and forgets his gap integrity. Nothing to do with double teams.
Kinda like Shaun Rogers. Interesting